数据隐私、信任和消费者自主权的综合实证研究

IF 1.5 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Indiana Law Journal Pub Date : 2015-02-28 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2576346
J. Kesan, C. Hayes, Masooda N. Bashir
{"title":"数据隐私、信任和消费者自主权的综合实证研究","authors":"J. Kesan, C. Hayes, Masooda N. Bashir","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2576346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern society is driven by data. Data storage is practically unlimited with today’s technology, and analytical tools make it very easy to find patterns and make predictions in a way that is very useful for private businesses and governments. These uses of digital data also raise considerable privacy issues that are of great concern to consumers. In this article, we present and analyze the results of an extensive survey that we conducted to explore what people know, what people do, and what people want, when it comes to privacy online. Our survey is the first comprehensive examination of the intersection of knowledge and opinions among the survey participants concerning online privacy, law, and the data practices of both the private sector and the government. Our survey results indicate that consumers often want more options than the market gives them. Over 80% of our survey participants, for example, indicated that on some occasion they have submitted information online when they wished that they did not have to do so. One of the possible reasons why consumers still participate in these markets is that they do not have any meaningful alternatives. The private sector currently has very little incentive to provide these alternatives because consumers have been responding to unattractive business practices with complacency. Responses to our survey also indicate a low level of trust of the government as a data collector and data keeper. Our results indicate that significant changes are needed to increase consumer engagement in the online marketplace and improve trust between the government and its citizens. These improvements should begin by empowering users and giving them more control over their digital data, and we present ambitious proposals to this end. The long-term solution that we propose would involve an overhaul of current data privacy laws, and the creation of a profile clearinghouse that would serve a similar purpose as credit reporting bureaus. Through this clearinghouse, consumers could view and challenge most information that private businesses and the government hold about them. Dramatic changes are necessary in order to ensure that consumers can have empowering and engaging experiences in today’s world of digital data.","PeriodicalId":46974,"journal":{"name":"Indiana Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Data Privacy, Trust, and Consumer Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"J. Kesan, C. Hayes, Masooda N. Bashir\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2576346\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern society is driven by data. Data storage is practically unlimited with today’s technology, and analytical tools make it very easy to find patterns and make predictions in a way that is very useful for private businesses and governments. These uses of digital data also raise considerable privacy issues that are of great concern to consumers. In this article, we present and analyze the results of an extensive survey that we conducted to explore what people know, what people do, and what people want, when it comes to privacy online. Our survey is the first comprehensive examination of the intersection of knowledge and opinions among the survey participants concerning online privacy, law, and the data practices of both the private sector and the government. Our survey results indicate that consumers often want more options than the market gives them. Over 80% of our survey participants, for example, indicated that on some occasion they have submitted information online when they wished that they did not have to do so. One of the possible reasons why consumers still participate in these markets is that they do not have any meaningful alternatives. The private sector currently has very little incentive to provide these alternatives because consumers have been responding to unattractive business practices with complacency. Responses to our survey also indicate a low level of trust of the government as a data collector and data keeper. Our results indicate that significant changes are needed to increase consumer engagement in the online marketplace and improve trust between the government and its citizens. These improvements should begin by empowering users and giving them more control over their digital data, and we present ambitious proposals to this end. The long-term solution that we propose would involve an overhaul of current data privacy laws, and the creation of a profile clearinghouse that would serve a similar purpose as credit reporting bureaus. Through this clearinghouse, consumers could view and challenge most information that private businesses and the government hold about them. Dramatic changes are necessary in order to ensure that consumers can have empowering and engaging experiences in today’s world of digital data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indiana Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indiana Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2576346\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indiana Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2576346","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

现代社会是由数据驱动的。在今天的技术下,数据存储几乎是无限的,分析工具可以很容易地找到模式并做出预测,这对私营企业和政府非常有用。这些数字数据的使用也引起了消费者非常关注的相当大的隐私问题。在本文中,我们展示并分析了一项广泛调查的结果,我们进行了这项调查,以探索人们在在线隐私方面知道什么,做什么以及想要什么。我们的调查首次全面考察了调查参与者对网络隐私、法律以及私营部门和政府的数据实践的知识和意见的交集。我们的调查结果表明,消费者想要的选择往往比市场提供的要多。例如,超过80%的调查参与者表示,在某些情况下,当他们希望他们不必这样做时,他们已经在网上提交了信息。消费者仍然参与这些市场的一个可能原因是,他们没有任何有意义的选择。私营部门目前几乎没有动力提供这些替代方案,因为消费者一直在自满地应对缺乏吸引力的商业做法。对我们调查的回应还表明,人们对政府作为数据收集者和数据保存者的信任度很低。我们的研究结果表明,要提高消费者对在线市场的参与度,改善政府与公民之间的信任,需要做出重大改变。这些改进应该从授权用户开始,让他们对自己的数字数据有更多的控制权,为此我们提出了雄心勃勃的建议。我们提出的长期解决方案将涉及对当前数据隐私法的全面改革,并创建一个与信用报告机构类似的信息交换中心。通过这个信息交换中心,消费者可以查看和质疑私营企业和政府掌握的关于他们的大多数信息。为了确保消费者能够在当今的数字数据世界中获得授权和吸引人的体验,必须进行巨大的变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Data Privacy, Trust, and Consumer Autonomy
Modern society is driven by data. Data storage is practically unlimited with today’s technology, and analytical tools make it very easy to find patterns and make predictions in a way that is very useful for private businesses and governments. These uses of digital data also raise considerable privacy issues that are of great concern to consumers. In this article, we present and analyze the results of an extensive survey that we conducted to explore what people know, what people do, and what people want, when it comes to privacy online. Our survey is the first comprehensive examination of the intersection of knowledge and opinions among the survey participants concerning online privacy, law, and the data practices of both the private sector and the government. Our survey results indicate that consumers often want more options than the market gives them. Over 80% of our survey participants, for example, indicated that on some occasion they have submitted information online when they wished that they did not have to do so. One of the possible reasons why consumers still participate in these markets is that they do not have any meaningful alternatives. The private sector currently has very little incentive to provide these alternatives because consumers have been responding to unattractive business practices with complacency. Responses to our survey also indicate a low level of trust of the government as a data collector and data keeper. Our results indicate that significant changes are needed to increase consumer engagement in the online marketplace and improve trust between the government and its citizens. These improvements should begin by empowering users and giving them more control over their digital data, and we present ambitious proposals to this end. The long-term solution that we propose would involve an overhaul of current data privacy laws, and the creation of a profile clearinghouse that would serve a similar purpose as credit reporting bureaus. Through this clearinghouse, consumers could view and challenge most information that private businesses and the government hold about them. Dramatic changes are necessary in order to ensure that consumers can have empowering and engaging experiences in today’s world of digital data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1925, the Indiana Law Journal is a general-interest academic legal journal. The Indiana Law Journal is published quarterly by students of the Indiana University Maurer School of Law — Bloomington. The opportunity to become a member of the Journal is available to all students at the end of their first-year. Members are selected in one of two ways. First, students in the top of their class academically are automatically invited to become members. Second, a blind-graded writing competition is held to fill the remaining slots. This competition tests students" Bluebook skills and legal writing ability. Overall, approximately thirty-five offers are extended each year. Candidates who accept their offers make a two-year commitment to the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Ordinary Causation: A Study in Experimental Statutory Interpretation Leave Bad Enough Alone A Dangerous Concoction: Pharmaceutical Marketing, Cognitive Biases, and First Amendment Overprotection Hands on the Wheel: A Call for Greater Regulation of Semi-Autonomous Cars The Fragile Menagerie: Biodiversity Loss, Climate Change, and the Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1