{"title":"人类学对法律重要吗?","authors":"Jeremy J. Kingsley, Kari G. Telle","doi":"10.3167/JLA.2018.020205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’\npedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each\nother than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology\nas disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational\nor research agendas.","PeriodicalId":34676,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Anthropology Matter to Law?\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy J. Kingsley, Kari G. Telle\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/JLA.2018.020205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’\\npedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each\\nother than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology\\nas disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational\\nor research agendas.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/JLA.2018.020205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
At a time of ‘interdisciplinary’ scholarly debate and ‘transdisciplinary’
pedagogy, some disciplines appear more siloed and tone deaf to each
other than ever before. This article will consider why law and anthropology
as disciplines offer almost no impact upon each other’s educational
or research agendas.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
