量化遗传算法和群算法在认知无线网络网络优化中的相对优点

J. Sonnenberg, D. Chester, J. E. Schroeder, K. Olds
{"title":"量化遗传算法和群算法在认知无线网络网络优化中的相对优点","authors":"J. Sonnenberg, D. Chester, J. E. Schroeder, K. Olds","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2012.6415590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive engines have been under study and development for a number of years as a technique for addressing the needs of cognitive radios [1,2,3]. More recently there has been effort to expand the role of the cognitive engine to address the needs of a network of cognitive radios [4,5]. Haykin [6] has demonstrated that there is a significant difference between a network of cognitive radios and a cognitive radio network. This paper addresses three questions: 1. What are the significant functional and parametric differences between cognitive algorithms that deal with optimizing the operations of a cognitive radio and cognitive algorithms that optimize the operations of a cognitive radio network? 2. What are the trade-offs in applying the various algorithms to each task? 3. Which algorithms are optimal for the networking tasks? This paper identifies a set of parameters that characterize candidate algorithms and explores the benefits and drawbacks of each for cognitive network tasks. We propose a tiered architecture of cognitive engine algorithms that work in tandem to optimize the use of cognitive networked radios for the optimal success of the networked mission.","PeriodicalId":18720,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference","volume":"39 6","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the relative merits of genetic and swarm algorithms for network optimization in cognitive radio networks\",\"authors\":\"J. Sonnenberg, D. Chester, J. E. Schroeder, K. Olds\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MILCOM.2012.6415590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cognitive engines have been under study and development for a number of years as a technique for addressing the needs of cognitive radios [1,2,3]. More recently there has been effort to expand the role of the cognitive engine to address the needs of a network of cognitive radios [4,5]. Haykin [6] has demonstrated that there is a significant difference between a network of cognitive radios and a cognitive radio network. This paper addresses three questions: 1. What are the significant functional and parametric differences between cognitive algorithms that deal with optimizing the operations of a cognitive radio and cognitive algorithms that optimize the operations of a cognitive radio network? 2. What are the trade-offs in applying the various algorithms to each task? 3. Which algorithms are optimal for the networking tasks? This paper identifies a set of parameters that characterize candidate algorithms and explores the benefits and drawbacks of each for cognitive network tasks. We propose a tiered architecture of cognitive engine algorithms that work in tandem to optimize the use of cognitive networked radios for the optimal success of the networked mission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2012.6415590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2012 - 2012 IEEE Military Communications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2012.6415590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

认知引擎作为一种解决认知无线电需求的技术已经研究和发展了很多年[1,2,3]。最近,人们努力扩大认知引擎的作用,以满足认知无线电网络的需求[4,5]。Haykin[6]已经证明认知无线电网络和认知无线电网络之间存在显著差异。本文解决了三个问题:1。用于优化认知无线电操作的认知算法与用于优化认知无线电网络操作的认知算法之间有什么显著的功能和参数差异?2. 将各种算法应用于每个任务的权衡是什么?3.哪些算法对于网络任务是最优的?本文确定了一组表征候选算法的参数,并探讨了每种算法在认知网络任务中的优缺点。我们提出了一种认知引擎算法的分层架构,这些算法协同工作以优化认知网络无线电的使用,以实现网络任务的最佳成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quantifying the relative merits of genetic and swarm algorithms for network optimization in cognitive radio networks
Cognitive engines have been under study and development for a number of years as a technique for addressing the needs of cognitive radios [1,2,3]. More recently there has been effort to expand the role of the cognitive engine to address the needs of a network of cognitive radios [4,5]. Haykin [6] has demonstrated that there is a significant difference between a network of cognitive radios and a cognitive radio network. This paper addresses three questions: 1. What are the significant functional and parametric differences between cognitive algorithms that deal with optimizing the operations of a cognitive radio and cognitive algorithms that optimize the operations of a cognitive radio network? 2. What are the trade-offs in applying the various algorithms to each task? 3. Which algorithms are optimal for the networking tasks? This paper identifies a set of parameters that characterize candidate algorithms and explores the benefits and drawbacks of each for cognitive network tasks. We propose a tiered architecture of cognitive engine algorithms that work in tandem to optimize the use of cognitive networked radios for the optimal success of the networked mission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Open Standard for Ka-band Interoperable Satellite Antennas An approach to data correlation using JC3IEDM model The U.s. Army and Network-centric Warfare a Thematic Analysis of the Literature Technology diffusion and military users: Perceptions that predict adoption Cooperative Multi-tree Sleep Scheduling for Surveillance in Wireless Sensor Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1