{"title":"切开子宫肌瘤切除术中血量估计的重量法准确性","authors":"C. Osakwe, I. Mbachu, Oluchi Osakwe, O. Ikpeze","doi":"10.4103/ijmh.IJMH_18_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Estimation of blood loss during surgery is a critical component that may affect patients’ management. Objective: The study evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of blood loss estimation in women with an open myomectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of measuring blood loss during open myomectomy for patients with symptomatic fibroid at a Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. The diagnosis of uterine fibroids was based on clinical examination and ultrasound scan. A proforma was used to record information from those who gave written consent. The gravimetric method and visual estimation were compared with the actual blood loss (ABL) as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was done using Stata version 16. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean blood loss estimation of the different methods. The significant level was set at P-value <0.05. Results: A total of 78 women who had open myomectomy participated in the study. The mean ABL was 787.11 ± 63.17 mL. The mean blood loss by the gravimetric method was 755.95 ± 492.72 mL, while the mean estimation error by the gravimetric method was 31.16 ± 263.23 mL. The mean difference between the estimated ABL and the loss estimated by the gravimetric method was 31.18 mL. This was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.30). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the ABL and blood loss by visual method (mean difference = 161.64, P-value = 0.02). Conclusion: The gravimetric estimation of blood loss during surgery correlated with actual estimated blood loss. It should be considered in the routine estimation of blood loss during surgery.","PeriodicalId":14106,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medicine and Health Development","volume":"9 5","pages":"245 - 250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of gravimetric method of blood loss estimation during open myomectomy\",\"authors\":\"C. Osakwe, I. Mbachu, Oluchi Osakwe, O. Ikpeze\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijmh.IJMH_18_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Estimation of blood loss during surgery is a critical component that may affect patients’ management. Objective: The study evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of blood loss estimation in women with an open myomectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of measuring blood loss during open myomectomy for patients with symptomatic fibroid at a Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. The diagnosis of uterine fibroids was based on clinical examination and ultrasound scan. A proforma was used to record information from those who gave written consent. The gravimetric method and visual estimation were compared with the actual blood loss (ABL) as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was done using Stata version 16. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean blood loss estimation of the different methods. The significant level was set at P-value <0.05. Results: A total of 78 women who had open myomectomy participated in the study. The mean ABL was 787.11 ± 63.17 mL. The mean blood loss by the gravimetric method was 755.95 ± 492.72 mL, while the mean estimation error by the gravimetric method was 31.16 ± 263.23 mL. The mean difference between the estimated ABL and the loss estimated by the gravimetric method was 31.18 mL. This was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.30). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the ABL and blood loss by visual method (mean difference = 161.64, P-value = 0.02). Conclusion: The gravimetric estimation of blood loss during surgery correlated with actual estimated blood loss. It should be considered in the routine estimation of blood loss during surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medicine and Health Development\",\"volume\":\"9 5\",\"pages\":\"245 - 250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medicine and Health Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmh.IJMH_18_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medicine and Health Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijmh.IJMH_18_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:手术中出血量的估计是影响患者治疗的关键因素。目的:评价剖宫腔子宫肌瘤切除术后重量法测定出血量的准确性。材料和方法:这是一项横断面分析研究,评估了尼日利亚一家教学医院对有症状的肌瘤患者进行切开子宫肌瘤切除术时重量法测量出血量的准确性。子宫肌瘤的诊断主要基于临床检查和超声扫描。表格被用来记录那些给予书面同意的人的信息。将重量法和目测法与实际失血量(ABL)作为金标准进行比较。统计分析使用Stata version 16完成。采用学生t检验比较不同方法估计的平均失血量。p值<0.05为显著水平。结果:共有78名接受开放性子宫肌瘤切除术的妇女参加了这项研究。平均ABL为787.11±63.17 mL。重量法的平均失血量为755.95±492.72 mL,重量法的平均估计误差为31.16±263.23 mL。估计的ABL与重量法估计的损失之间的平均差值为31.18 mL。这没有统计学意义(p值= 0.30)。而目测ABL与出血量比较,差异有统计学意义(平均差异= 161.64,p值= 0.02)。结论:术中失血量的重量估计值与实际失血量估计值具有相关性。术中出血量的常规估计应考虑到这一点。
Accuracy of gravimetric method of blood loss estimation during open myomectomy
Background: Estimation of blood loss during surgery is a critical component that may affect patients’ management. Objective: The study evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of blood loss estimation in women with an open myomectomy. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study that evaluated the accuracy of the gravimetric method of measuring blood loss during open myomectomy for patients with symptomatic fibroid at a Teaching Hospital in Nigeria. The diagnosis of uterine fibroids was based on clinical examination and ultrasound scan. A proforma was used to record information from those who gave written consent. The gravimetric method and visual estimation were compared with the actual blood loss (ABL) as the gold standard. Statistical analysis was done using Stata version 16. Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean blood loss estimation of the different methods. The significant level was set at P-value <0.05. Results: A total of 78 women who had open myomectomy participated in the study. The mean ABL was 787.11 ± 63.17 mL. The mean blood loss by the gravimetric method was 755.95 ± 492.72 mL, while the mean estimation error by the gravimetric method was 31.16 ± 263.23 mL. The mean difference between the estimated ABL and the loss estimated by the gravimetric method was 31.18 mL. This was not statistically significant (P-value = 0.30). However, there was a statistically significant difference between the ABL and blood loss by visual method (mean difference = 161.64, P-value = 0.02). Conclusion: The gravimetric estimation of blood loss during surgery correlated with actual estimated blood loss. It should be considered in the routine estimation of blood loss during surgery.