编者名单:乡土建筑和建筑与景观的视角

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum Pub Date : 2019-09-01 DOI:10.1353/bdl.2019.0013
ANDREA R ROBERTS, Avigail Sachs, Brent R. Fortenberry, B. Goldstein, Cristina Stancioiu, Cynthia G. Falk, J. M. Lord, L. Rainville, Paula Lupkin, R. Cowherd, Weiju Zhao, Zachary J. Violette
{"title":"编者名单:乡土建筑和建筑与景观的视角","authors":"ANDREA R ROBERTS, Avigail Sachs, Brent R. Fortenberry, B. Goldstein, Cristina Stancioiu, Cynthia G. Falk, J. M. Lord, L. Rainville, Paula Lupkin, R. Cowherd, Weiju Zhao, Zachary J. Violette","doi":"10.1353/bdl.2019.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Angel David Nieves and Leslie M. Alexander's We Shall Independent Be (2008), which contemplated the relationship between American ideals such as freedom and black space creation, advanced the validity of vernacular African American placemaking and architecture as a by-product of protest, cultural expression, and intentional design. Despite this, few scholars have focused on related rural African American building and preservation practices as expressions of a continuous freedom struggle and diasporic search for home. Through observation of African American grassroots preservationists, this essay argues for increased attention to rural grassroots homestead preservation. From 1865 to 1920, former slaves founded more than 557 \"freedom colonies\" across Texas. Ethnographic and archival research conducted within Newton County freedom colonies demonstrates that descendants, regardless of residency status, have sustained place attachments and nurtured stewardship of homesteads through heritage conservation, rehabilitation, and family property retention. Rehabilitation activities in two settlements, Shankleville and Pleasant Hill, show the relationship between intangible heritage and descendants' landscape stewardship practices. The concept, called here the homeplace aesthetic, illuminates descendants' preservation methods, resilience strategies, and stylistic preferences as unrecognized dimensions of significance and integrity. The concept of a homeplace aesthetic also explains descendants' concurrent negotiation—through subversion and assimilation—of the racialized landscape and regulatory environment, with important implications for preservation documentation and legal regulations.","PeriodicalId":41826,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"List of Editors: Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture and Buildings & Landscapes\",\"authors\":\"ANDREA R ROBERTS, Avigail Sachs, Brent R. Fortenberry, B. Goldstein, Cristina Stancioiu, Cynthia G. Falk, J. M. Lord, L. Rainville, Paula Lupkin, R. Cowherd, Weiju Zhao, Zachary J. Violette\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/bdl.2019.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Angel David Nieves and Leslie M. Alexander's We Shall Independent Be (2008), which contemplated the relationship between American ideals such as freedom and black space creation, advanced the validity of vernacular African American placemaking and architecture as a by-product of protest, cultural expression, and intentional design. Despite this, few scholars have focused on related rural African American building and preservation practices as expressions of a continuous freedom struggle and diasporic search for home. Through observation of African American grassroots preservationists, this essay argues for increased attention to rural grassroots homestead preservation. From 1865 to 1920, former slaves founded more than 557 \\\"freedom colonies\\\" across Texas. Ethnographic and archival research conducted within Newton County freedom colonies demonstrates that descendants, regardless of residency status, have sustained place attachments and nurtured stewardship of homesteads through heritage conservation, rehabilitation, and family property retention. Rehabilitation activities in two settlements, Shankleville and Pleasant Hill, show the relationship between intangible heritage and descendants' landscape stewardship practices. The concept, called here the homeplace aesthetic, illuminates descendants' preservation methods, resilience strategies, and stylistic preferences as unrecognized dimensions of significance and integrity. The concept of a homeplace aesthetic also explains descendants' concurrent negotiation—through subversion and assimilation—of the racialized landscape and regulatory environment, with important implications for preservation documentation and legal regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/bdl.2019.0013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/bdl.2019.0013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:安吉尔·大卫·尼夫斯和莱斯利·m·亚历山大的《我们应该独立》(2008)思考了自由等美国理想与黑人空间创造之间的关系,提出了非洲裔美国人的地方制造和建筑作为抗议、文化表达和有意设计的副产品的有效性。尽管如此,很少有学者关注相关的非洲裔美国农村建筑和保护实践,将其作为持续的自由斗争和流散寻找家园的表达。通过对非裔美国基层保护主义者的观察,本文认为应该增加对农村基层宅基地保护的关注。从1865年到1920年,前奴隶在德克萨斯州建立了超过557个“自由殖民地”。在牛顿县自由殖民地进行的人种学和档案研究表明,无论居住身份如何,后代都通过遗产保护、修复和家庭财产保留保持了对家园的依恋和管理。Shankleville和Pleasant Hill两个定居点的修复活动显示了非物质遗产与后代景观管理实践之间的关系。这个概念在这里被称为家园美学,它阐明了后代的保存方法、恢复策略和风格偏好,这些都是未被认识到的重要性和完整性的维度。家园美学的概念也解释了后代通过颠覆和同化对种族化景观和监管环境的同步协商,这对保存文件和法律法规具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
List of Editors: Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture and Buildings & Landscapes
Abstract:Angel David Nieves and Leslie M. Alexander's We Shall Independent Be (2008), which contemplated the relationship between American ideals such as freedom and black space creation, advanced the validity of vernacular African American placemaking and architecture as a by-product of protest, cultural expression, and intentional design. Despite this, few scholars have focused on related rural African American building and preservation practices as expressions of a continuous freedom struggle and diasporic search for home. Through observation of African American grassroots preservationists, this essay argues for increased attention to rural grassroots homestead preservation. From 1865 to 1920, former slaves founded more than 557 "freedom colonies" across Texas. Ethnographic and archival research conducted within Newton County freedom colonies demonstrates that descendants, regardless of residency status, have sustained place attachments and nurtured stewardship of homesteads through heritage conservation, rehabilitation, and family property retention. Rehabilitation activities in two settlements, Shankleville and Pleasant Hill, show the relationship between intangible heritage and descendants' landscape stewardship practices. The concept, called here the homeplace aesthetic, illuminates descendants' preservation methods, resilience strategies, and stylistic preferences as unrecognized dimensions of significance and integrity. The concept of a homeplace aesthetic also explains descendants' concurrent negotiation—through subversion and assimilation—of the racialized landscape and regulatory environment, with important implications for preservation documentation and legal regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Buildings & Landscapes is the leading source for scholarly work on vernacular architecture of North America and beyond. The journal continues VAF’s tradition of scholarly publication going back to the first Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture in 1982. Published through the University of Minnesota Press since 2007, the journal moved from one to two issues per year in 2009. Buildings & Landscapes examines the places that people build and experience every day: houses and cities, farmsteads and alleys, churches and courthouses, subdivisions and shopping malls. The journal’s contributorsundefinedhistorians and architectural historians, preservationists and architects, geographers, anthropologists and folklorists, and others whose work involves documenting, analyzing, and interpreting vernacular formsundefinedapproach the built environment as a windows into human life and culture, basing their scholarship on both fieldwork and archival research. The editors encourage submission of articles that explore the ways the built environment shapes everyday life within and beyond North America.
期刊最新文献
A Detroit Story: Urban Decline and the Rise of Property Informality by Claire W. Herbert (review) Building Antebellum New Orleans: Free People of Color and Their Influence by Tara A. Dudley (review) “The Strange Artistic Genius of This People”: The Ephemeral Art and Impermanent Architecture of Italian Immigrant Catholic Feste Hiring Out: Enslaved Black Building Artisans in North Carolina Dreaming the Present: Time, Aesthetics, and the Black Cooperative Movement by Irvin J. Hunt, and: Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement by Monica M. White (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1