供需不确定性下的采购调度:经典调度、被动调度和主动调度的比较案例研究

Joohyun Shin, Jay H. Lee
{"title":"供需不确定性下的采购调度:经典调度、被动调度和主动调度的比较案例研究","authors":"Joohyun Shin, Jay H. Lee","doi":"10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supply chain of a manufacturing system contains procurement activity, and unloading raw materials from delivery vessels to storage tanks should be scheduled optimally, subject to the operational constraints. In general, an MILP model is used for a systematic procurement scheduling. However if there exists significant uncertainty in supply and demand, the solution obtained from the deterministic model may be suboptimal or even infeasible. Therefore in this study, two alternative approaches are formulated to consider these uncertainties: reactive rescheduling in the rolling horizon manner, and Markov decision process (MDP) formulation based scheduling that incorporates future uncertainty into the scheduling directly. In order to solve the MDP problem, algorithmic approximation strategies (such as approximate dynamic programming) are studied and applied for reducing computational challenges. Finally, their performances are compared with those of the original MILP model for a simple case study.","PeriodicalId":6641,"journal":{"name":"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)","volume":"15 1","pages":"636-641"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Procurement scheduling under supply and demand uncertainty: Case study for comparing classical, reactive, and proactive scheduling\",\"authors\":\"Joohyun Shin, Jay H. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supply chain of a manufacturing system contains procurement activity, and unloading raw materials from delivery vessels to storage tanks should be scheduled optimally, subject to the operational constraints. In general, an MILP model is used for a systematic procurement scheduling. However if there exists significant uncertainty in supply and demand, the solution obtained from the deterministic model may be suboptimal or even infeasible. Therefore in this study, two alternative approaches are formulated to consider these uncertainties: reactive rescheduling in the rolling horizon manner, and Markov decision process (MDP) formulation based scheduling that incorporates future uncertainty into the scheduling directly. In order to solve the MDP problem, algorithmic approximation strategies (such as approximate dynamic programming) are studied and applied for reducing computational challenges. Finally, their performances are compared with those of the original MILP model for a simple case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6641,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"636-641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制造系统的供应链包含采购活动,在受操作约束的情况下,将原材料从运输船只卸载到储罐应进行最佳调度。一般来说,系统的采购计划通常采用MILP模型。然而,如果供需存在较大的不确定性,则由确定性模型得到的解可能是次优的,甚至是不可行的。因此,本研究制定了两种替代方法来考虑这些不确定性:滚动地平线方式的反应性重调度和基于马尔可夫决策过程(MDP)的调度,将未来的不确定性直接纳入调度中。为了解决MDP问题,研究并应用算法逼近策略(如近似动态规划)来减少计算挑战。最后,通过一个简单的案例研究,将它们与原始MILP模型的性能进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Procurement scheduling under supply and demand uncertainty: Case study for comparing classical, reactive, and proactive scheduling
Supply chain of a manufacturing system contains procurement activity, and unloading raw materials from delivery vessels to storage tanks should be scheduled optimally, subject to the operational constraints. In general, an MILP model is used for a systematic procurement scheduling. However if there exists significant uncertainty in supply and demand, the solution obtained from the deterministic model may be suboptimal or even infeasible. Therefore in this study, two alternative approaches are formulated to consider these uncertainties: reactive rescheduling in the rolling horizon manner, and Markov decision process (MDP) formulation based scheduling that incorporates future uncertainty into the scheduling directly. In order to solve the MDP problem, algorithmic approximation strategies (such as approximate dynamic programming) are studied and applied for reducing computational challenges. Finally, their performances are compared with those of the original MILP model for a simple case study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Backstepping and backstepping sliding mode controller for droplet position in electrowetting on Dielectric system Procurement scheduling under supply and demand uncertainty: Case study for comparing classical, reactive, and proactive scheduling Design of an assistance robot for patients suffering from Paraplegia A reel-time control for precise walking of bipped robot Fabrication of 3D printed circuit device by using direct write technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1