协助自杀:问题的核心

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL University of Toronto Medical Journal Pub Date : 2010-10-31 DOI:10.5015/UTMJ.V88I1.1299

D. Pincus

{"title":"协助自杀:问题的核心","authors":"D. Pincus","doi":"10.5015/UTMJ.V88I1.1299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Debate about the moral status of assisted suicide may inform debate about the actâ€™s legal status. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is raise questions about the moral status of assisted suicide by comparing the views of Richard Doerflinger with those of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress.","PeriodicalId":41298,"journal":{"name":"University of Toronto Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2010-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assisted Suicide: To the Heart of the Matter\",\"authors\":\"D. Pincus\",\"doi\":\"10.5015/UTMJ.V88I1.1299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Debate about the moral status of assisted suicide may inform debate about the actâ€™s legal status. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is raise questions about the moral status of assisted suicide by comparing the views of Richard Doerflinger with those of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Toronto Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Toronto Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5015/UTMJ.V88I1.1299\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Toronto Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5015/UTMJ.V88I1.1299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于协助自杀的道德地位的争论可能会启发关于该行为法律地位的争论。因此，本文的目的是通过比较Richard Doerflinger与Tom Beauchamp和James Childress的观点，提出关于协助自杀的道德地位问题。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Assisted Suicide: To the Heart of the Matter

Debate about the moral status of assisted suicide may inform debate about the actâ€™s legal status. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is raise questions about the moral status of assisted suicide by comparing the views of Richard Doerflinger with those of Tom Beauchamp and James Childress.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

University of Toronto Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量