解释了临床预警预测风险的增加

Michaela Hardt, A. Rajkomar, Gerardo Flores, Andrew M. Dai, M. Howell, Greg S. Corrado, Claire Cui, Moritz Hardt
{"title":"解释了临床预警预测风险的增加","authors":"Michaela Hardt, A. Rajkomar, Gerardo Flores, Andrew M. Dai, M. Howell, Greg S. Corrado, Claire Cui, Moritz Hardt","doi":"10.1145/3368555.3384460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Much work aims to explain a model's prediction on a static input. We consider explanations in a temporal setting where a stateful dynamical model produces a sequence of risk estimates given an input at each time step. When the estimated risk increases, the goal of the explanation is to attribute the increase to a few relevant inputs from the past. While our formal setup and techniques are general, we carry out an in-depth case study in a clinical setting. The goal here is to alert a clinician when a patient's risk of deterioration rises. The clinician then has to decide whether to intervene and adjust the treatment. Given a potentially long sequence of new events since she last saw the patient, a concise explanation helps her to quickly triage the alert. We develop methods to lift static attribution techniques to the dynamical setting, where we identify and address challenges specific to dynamics. We then experimentally assess the utility of different explanations of clinical alerts through expert evaluation.","PeriodicalId":87342,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining an increase in predicted risk for clinical alerts\",\"authors\":\"Michaela Hardt, A. Rajkomar, Gerardo Flores, Andrew M. Dai, M. Howell, Greg S. Corrado, Claire Cui, Moritz Hardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3368555.3384460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Much work aims to explain a model's prediction on a static input. We consider explanations in a temporal setting where a stateful dynamical model produces a sequence of risk estimates given an input at each time step. When the estimated risk increases, the goal of the explanation is to attribute the increase to a few relevant inputs from the past. While our formal setup and techniques are general, we carry out an in-depth case study in a clinical setting. The goal here is to alert a clinician when a patient's risk of deterioration rises. The clinician then has to decide whether to intervene and adjust the treatment. Given a potentially long sequence of new events since she last saw the patient, a concise explanation helps her to quickly triage the alert. We develop methods to lift static attribution techniques to the dynamical setting, where we identify and address challenges specific to dynamics. We then experimentally assess the utility of different explanations of clinical alerts through expert evaluation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3368555.3384460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Health, Inference, and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3368555.3384460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

许多工作旨在解释模型对静态输入的预测。我们考虑在时间设置中的解释,其中有状态动态模型在每个时间步产生给定输入的风险估计序列。当估计的风险增加时,解释的目标是将增加归因于过去的一些相关输入。虽然我们的正式设置和技术是一般的,但我们在临床环境中进行深入的案例研究。这样做的目的是在病人病情恶化的风险上升时提醒临床医生。然后,临床医生必须决定是否进行干预和调整治疗。鉴于她上次见到病人后可能发生了一系列新事件,一个简明的解释有助于她快速对警报进行分类。我们开发了将静态归因技术提升到动态环境的方法,在动态环境中我们识别和解决特定的挑战。然后,我们通过专家评估实验评估临床警报的不同解释的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining an increase in predicted risk for clinical alerts
Much work aims to explain a model's prediction on a static input. We consider explanations in a temporal setting where a stateful dynamical model produces a sequence of risk estimates given an input at each time step. When the estimated risk increases, the goal of the explanation is to attribute the increase to a few relevant inputs from the past. While our formal setup and techniques are general, we carry out an in-depth case study in a clinical setting. The goal here is to alert a clinician when a patient's risk of deterioration rises. The clinician then has to decide whether to intervene and adjust the treatment. Given a potentially long sequence of new events since she last saw the patient, a concise explanation helps her to quickly triage the alert. We develop methods to lift static attribution techniques to the dynamical setting, where we identify and address challenges specific to dynamics. We then experimentally assess the utility of different explanations of clinical alerts through expert evaluation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Explaining a machine learning decision to physicians via counterfactuals Rare Life Event Detection via Mobile Sensing Using Multi-Task Learning PTGB: Pre-Train Graph Neural Networks for Brain Network Analysis Large-Scale Study of Temporal Shift in Health Insurance Claims Token Imbalance Adaptation for Radiology Report Generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1