走向电话技术的历史

IF 1 1区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY History and Technology Pub Date : 2019-04-03 DOI:10.1080/07341512.2019.1652959
G. Balbi, Christiane Berth
{"title":"走向电话技术的历史","authors":"G. Balbi, Christiane Berth","doi":"10.1080/07341512.2019.1652959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue aims to start a new phase in the historiography of the telephone. This medium has been approached narrowly both by scholars in media studies and technology and, when studied, mainly with a national, mono-medial, and mono-usage perspective. Significantly, histories of the telephone have been narrated as a series of national histories and so many transnational, regional or local histories were not considered. Although telephone networks were mainly controlled and regulated at the national level, transnational exchange always existed, for example through the activities of engineers’ networks, multinational firms, and international organizations. As well, while global history approaches have been applied to the history of the telegraph, for the telephone a similar debate is still missing. Geopolitically, telephone research has remained limited to Europe and North America. There is a scarcity of works dealing with Asian, African or Latin American experiences and a small number of studies on multinational companies and international experts’ networks. Secondly, the majority of telephone histories have focused on the telephone per se, without considering other media or technologies which were affected by and have affected the development of the telephone. There are of course exceptions; the work of Jon Agar on the history of the mobile telephone remains one of the best books on this subject, where the development of the mobile is located in a broader perspective in which the landline telephone, broadcasting and even rising digital media like the computer are included. Similarly, the telephone has been often seen as a tool to communicate at a distance from one point to another (a one-to-one medium) and this mono-usage perspective has obscured other, alternative histories of the telephone (this is what we call a mono-medial perspective). Indeed, the telephone has been also used as a one-to-many form of communication and, with the so called ‘circular telephone’, listeners could access information, entertainment and different genres via the telephone even before the spread of radio broadcasting. As well, histories of technologies-in-use have shown that social networks, tinkering, resistance and imagination changed both technologies and the character of social life. For example, the historian Ruth Schwartz Cowan introduced a focus on consumers’ perspectives and preferences. According to Cowan, consumers’ decision-making on technologies is embedded in a network of social relations, which she termed the ‘consumption junction’. In fact, this special issue demonstrates how numerous actors decided for or","PeriodicalId":45996,"journal":{"name":"History and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a telephonic history of technology\",\"authors\":\"G. Balbi, Christiane Berth\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07341512.2019.1652959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue aims to start a new phase in the historiography of the telephone. This medium has been approached narrowly both by scholars in media studies and technology and, when studied, mainly with a national, mono-medial, and mono-usage perspective. Significantly, histories of the telephone have been narrated as a series of national histories and so many transnational, regional or local histories were not considered. Although telephone networks were mainly controlled and regulated at the national level, transnational exchange always existed, for example through the activities of engineers’ networks, multinational firms, and international organizations. As well, while global history approaches have been applied to the history of the telegraph, for the telephone a similar debate is still missing. Geopolitically, telephone research has remained limited to Europe and North America. There is a scarcity of works dealing with Asian, African or Latin American experiences and a small number of studies on multinational companies and international experts’ networks. Secondly, the majority of telephone histories have focused on the telephone per se, without considering other media or technologies which were affected by and have affected the development of the telephone. There are of course exceptions; the work of Jon Agar on the history of the mobile telephone remains one of the best books on this subject, where the development of the mobile is located in a broader perspective in which the landline telephone, broadcasting and even rising digital media like the computer are included. Similarly, the telephone has been often seen as a tool to communicate at a distance from one point to another (a one-to-one medium) and this mono-usage perspective has obscured other, alternative histories of the telephone (this is what we call a mono-medial perspective). Indeed, the telephone has been also used as a one-to-many form of communication and, with the so called ‘circular telephone’, listeners could access information, entertainment and different genres via the telephone even before the spread of radio broadcasting. As well, histories of technologies-in-use have shown that social networks, tinkering, resistance and imagination changed both technologies and the character of social life. For example, the historian Ruth Schwartz Cowan introduced a focus on consumers’ perspectives and preferences. According to Cowan, consumers’ decision-making on technologies is embedded in a network of social relations, which she termed the ‘consumption junction’. In fact, this special issue demonstrates how numerous actors decided for or\",\"PeriodicalId\":45996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1652959\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07341512.2019.1652959","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本期特刊旨在开启电话史学的新阶段。媒体研究和技术方面的学者都对这种媒介进行了狭隘的研究,并且在研究时主要从国家、单一媒体和单一用途的角度进行研究。值得注意的是,电话的历史被叙述为一系列的国家历史,而许多跨国的、地区的或地方的历史没有被考虑在内。虽然电话网络主要在国家一级受到控制和管制,但跨国交换一直存在,例如通过工程师网络、跨国公司和国际组织的活动。同样,虽然全球历史的方法已经应用于电报的历史,但对于电话来说,类似的辩论仍然缺失。从地缘政治上讲,电话研究仍然局限于欧洲和北美。关于亚洲、非洲或拉丁美洲经验的著作很少,关于跨国公司和国际专家网络的研究也很少。其次,大多数电话历史都集中在电话本身,而没有考虑受电话影响并影响电话发展的其他媒体或技术。当然也有例外;Jon Agar在移动电话历史上的工作仍然是这个主题上最好的书之一,其中移动的发展位于一个更广阔的视角,其中座机电话,广播,甚至像计算机这样的新兴数字媒体都包括在内。类似地,电话经常被视为从一个点到另一个点的远距离通信工具(一对一的媒介),这种单一用途的观点掩盖了电话的其他替代历史(这就是我们所说的单一媒介观点)。事实上,电话也被用作一对多的交流方式,有了所谓的“循环电话”,听众甚至在无线电广播普及之前就可以通过电话获得信息、娱乐和不同的类型。此外,技术使用的历史表明,社交网络、修补、抵制和想象力既改变了技术,也改变了社会生活的特征。例如,历史学家Ruth Schwartz Cowan引入了对消费者观点和偏好的关注。根据考恩的说法,消费者对技术的决策植根于社会关系网络,她称之为“消费结合点”。事实上,这期特刊展示了许多演员是如何选择或选择的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a telephonic history of technology
This special issue aims to start a new phase in the historiography of the telephone. This medium has been approached narrowly both by scholars in media studies and technology and, when studied, mainly with a national, mono-medial, and mono-usage perspective. Significantly, histories of the telephone have been narrated as a series of national histories and so many transnational, regional or local histories were not considered. Although telephone networks were mainly controlled and regulated at the national level, transnational exchange always existed, for example through the activities of engineers’ networks, multinational firms, and international organizations. As well, while global history approaches have been applied to the history of the telegraph, for the telephone a similar debate is still missing. Geopolitically, telephone research has remained limited to Europe and North America. There is a scarcity of works dealing with Asian, African or Latin American experiences and a small number of studies on multinational companies and international experts’ networks. Secondly, the majority of telephone histories have focused on the telephone per se, without considering other media or technologies which were affected by and have affected the development of the telephone. There are of course exceptions; the work of Jon Agar on the history of the mobile telephone remains one of the best books on this subject, where the development of the mobile is located in a broader perspective in which the landline telephone, broadcasting and even rising digital media like the computer are included. Similarly, the telephone has been often seen as a tool to communicate at a distance from one point to another (a one-to-one medium) and this mono-usage perspective has obscured other, alternative histories of the telephone (this is what we call a mono-medial perspective). Indeed, the telephone has been also used as a one-to-many form of communication and, with the so called ‘circular telephone’, listeners could access information, entertainment and different genres via the telephone even before the spread of radio broadcasting. As well, histories of technologies-in-use have shown that social networks, tinkering, resistance and imagination changed both technologies and the character of social life. For example, the historian Ruth Schwartz Cowan introduced a focus on consumers’ perspectives and preferences. According to Cowan, consumers’ decision-making on technologies is embedded in a network of social relations, which she termed the ‘consumption junction’. In fact, this special issue demonstrates how numerous actors decided for or
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: History and Technology serves as an international forum for research on technology in history. A guiding premise is that technology—as knowledge, practice, and material resource—has been a key site for constituting the human experience. In the modern era, it becomes central to our understanding of the making and transformation of societies and cultures, on a local or transnational scale. The journal welcomes historical contributions on any aspect of technology but encourages research that addresses this wider frame through commensurate analytic and critical approaches.
期刊最新文献
Hegemony, co-production and the American Empire: essays in honor of John Krige About the Cover Striking the empire back: Dr. Strangelove and the global histories of technology Botanical surveying, nation-building and American empire: the US quest for a Philippine flora, 1903–1925 Swimming with the coelacanth: the UK and export controls of technology and knowledge in the Cold War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1