Y. Xiong, Guoming Li, B. Ramirez, R. Burns, R. Gates
{"title":"评估蛋鸡设施的EPA排放模型草案","authors":"Y. Xiong, Guoming Li, B. Ramirez, R. Burns, R. Gates","doi":"10.13031/ja.15237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights Draft EPA emission models for laying hen facilities were systematically evaluated. The models performed poorly on predicting the air pollutants when input variables were out of the NAEMS data range. A key finding was the unanticipated sensitivity of the draft model outputs to bird inventory and climate zones. Further revision and improvement may be necessary for draft models before they can be adopted by the egg industry. Abstract. In August 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released draft models to estimate daily NH3, H2S, PM10, PM2.5, and TSP emissions from egg-layer houses (high-rise and manure-belt) and manure storage using inputs of daily mean ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and hen inventory. These models were developed from refined datasets generated by the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study fieldwork completed in 2009. Notably, they do not include data for cage-free housing. Currently, 66% of U.S. laying hens are housed in cages; thus, these models, if adopted, will have a substantial impact on the U.S. egg industry. This study evaluated the EPA draft models’ robustness and assessed model outputs for egg production systems under differing climate scenarios. The EPA draft models distort emission factors for bird inventories to be lower or higher than those used to develop the models. With inventory held constant, the marginal influence of ambient temperature and RH on daily emissions varied substantially, with some values falling below the measurement detection threshold while others exceeding literature findings. For twelve representative U.S. locations representing differing climates, substantial differences in emission factors were found for bird inventories outside the range in the database. Annual emissions estimated from inventories used to develop the EPA models also varied by location. We conclude that the current draft EPA emission models cannot be used to the degree of precision that is suitable to apply to a wide range of layer facilities, particularly cage-free systems. Revisions are suggested to accommodate a greater range of climates, laying hen facility types, and inventories for practical emission estimations. Keywords: Air quality, Ammonia, Egg production, Emission model, Hydrogen sulfide, Particulate matter, Poultry.","PeriodicalId":29714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASABE","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Draft EPA Emissions Models for Laying Hen Facilities\",\"authors\":\"Y. Xiong, Guoming Li, B. Ramirez, R. Burns, R. Gates\",\"doi\":\"10.13031/ja.15237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights Draft EPA emission models for laying hen facilities were systematically evaluated. The models performed poorly on predicting the air pollutants when input variables were out of the NAEMS data range. A key finding was the unanticipated sensitivity of the draft model outputs to bird inventory and climate zones. Further revision and improvement may be necessary for draft models before they can be adopted by the egg industry. Abstract. In August 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released draft models to estimate daily NH3, H2S, PM10, PM2.5, and TSP emissions from egg-layer houses (high-rise and manure-belt) and manure storage using inputs of daily mean ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and hen inventory. These models were developed from refined datasets generated by the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study fieldwork completed in 2009. Notably, they do not include data for cage-free housing. Currently, 66% of U.S. laying hens are housed in cages; thus, these models, if adopted, will have a substantial impact on the U.S. egg industry. This study evaluated the EPA draft models’ robustness and assessed model outputs for egg production systems under differing climate scenarios. The EPA draft models distort emission factors for bird inventories to be lower or higher than those used to develop the models. With inventory held constant, the marginal influence of ambient temperature and RH on daily emissions varied substantially, with some values falling below the measurement detection threshold while others exceeding literature findings. For twelve representative U.S. locations representing differing climates, substantial differences in emission factors were found for bird inventories outside the range in the database. Annual emissions estimated from inventories used to develop the EPA models also varied by location. We conclude that the current draft EPA emission models cannot be used to the degree of precision that is suitable to apply to a wide range of layer facilities, particularly cage-free systems. Revisions are suggested to accommodate a greater range of climates, laying hen facility types, and inventories for practical emission estimations. Keywords: Air quality, Ammonia, Egg production, Emission model, Hydrogen sulfide, Particulate matter, Poultry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating Draft EPA Emissions Models for Laying Hen Facilities
Highlights Draft EPA emission models for laying hen facilities were systematically evaluated. The models performed poorly on predicting the air pollutants when input variables were out of the NAEMS data range. A key finding was the unanticipated sensitivity of the draft model outputs to bird inventory and climate zones. Further revision and improvement may be necessary for draft models before they can be adopted by the egg industry. Abstract. In August 2021, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released draft models to estimate daily NH3, H2S, PM10, PM2.5, and TSP emissions from egg-layer houses (high-rise and manure-belt) and manure storage using inputs of daily mean ambient temperature, relative humidity (RH), and hen inventory. These models were developed from refined datasets generated by the National Air Emissions Monitoring Study fieldwork completed in 2009. Notably, they do not include data for cage-free housing. Currently, 66% of U.S. laying hens are housed in cages; thus, these models, if adopted, will have a substantial impact on the U.S. egg industry. This study evaluated the EPA draft models’ robustness and assessed model outputs for egg production systems under differing climate scenarios. The EPA draft models distort emission factors for bird inventories to be lower or higher than those used to develop the models. With inventory held constant, the marginal influence of ambient temperature and RH on daily emissions varied substantially, with some values falling below the measurement detection threshold while others exceeding literature findings. For twelve representative U.S. locations representing differing climates, substantial differences in emission factors were found for bird inventories outside the range in the database. Annual emissions estimated from inventories used to develop the EPA models also varied by location. We conclude that the current draft EPA emission models cannot be used to the degree of precision that is suitable to apply to a wide range of layer facilities, particularly cage-free systems. Revisions are suggested to accommodate a greater range of climates, laying hen facility types, and inventories for practical emission estimations. Keywords: Air quality, Ammonia, Egg production, Emission model, Hydrogen sulfide, Particulate matter, Poultry.