D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano
{"title":"多西紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(TC)辅助化疗方案在两个巴西癌症中心的发热性中性粒细胞减少风险","authors":"D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano","doi":"10.4172/2329-6771.1000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce \n local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and \n Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a \n considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate \n hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients. \nMethods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from \n Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the \n analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery. \nResults: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good \n performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4 \n cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available \n in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis \n in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN \n episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In \n contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher, \n namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant \n lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049). \nConclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous \n reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as \n used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN \n and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.","PeriodicalId":16252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Oncology","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Febrile Neutropenia Risk with Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) Chemotherapy Regimen in Two Brazilians Cancer Centers\",\"authors\":\"D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-6771.1000195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce \\n local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and \\n Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a \\n considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate \\n hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients. \\nMethods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from \\n Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the \\n analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery. \\nResults: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good \\n performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4 \\n cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available \\n in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis \\n in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN \\n episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In \\n contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher, \\n namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant \\n lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049). \\nConclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous \\n reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as \\n used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN \\n and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Oncology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6771.1000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6771.1000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Febrile Neutropenia Risk with Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) Chemotherapy Regimen in Two Brazilians Cancer Centers
Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce
local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and
Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a
considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate
hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients.
Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from
Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the
analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery.
Results: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good
performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4
cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available
in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis
in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN
episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In
contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher,
namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant
lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049).
Conclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous
reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as
used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN
and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.