多西紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(TC)辅助化疗方案在两个巴西癌症中心的发热性中性粒细胞减少风险

D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano
{"title":"多西紫杉醇和环磷酰胺(TC)辅助化疗方案在两个巴西癌症中心的发热性中性粒细胞减少风险","authors":"D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano","doi":"10.4172/2329-6771.1000195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce \n local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and \n Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a \n considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate \n hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients. \nMethods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from \n Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the \n analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery. \nResults: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good \n performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4 \n cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available \n in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis \n in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN \n episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In \n contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher, \n namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant \n lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049). \nConclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous \n reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as \n used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN \n and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.","PeriodicalId":16252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrative Oncology","volume":"38 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Febrile Neutropenia Risk with Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) Chemotherapy Regimen in Two Brazilians Cancer Centers\",\"authors\":\"D. Gagliato, João Paulo Velloso Medrado Santos, R. Cossetti, Rodrigo Darouche Gimenez, A. C. C. D. Gouvêa, M. S. Ferrari, A. Katz, R. Marques, M. Mano\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2329-6771.1000195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce \\n local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and \\n Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a \\n considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate \\n hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients. \\nMethods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from \\n Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the \\n analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery. \\nResults: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good \\n performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4 \\n cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available \\n in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis \\n in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN \\n episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In \\n contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher, \\n namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant \\n lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049). \\nConclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous \\n reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as \\n used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN \\n and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Integrative Oncology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Integrative Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6771.1000195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrative Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6771.1000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导论:在选定的乳腺癌(BC)患者中,辅助化疗可能降低局部和全身复发风险,以及癌症死亡率。多西他赛联合环磷酰胺(TC)是公认的有效的辅助化疗方案。尽管如此,与这种方案相关的发热性中性粒细胞减少(FN)的相当高的比率。我们试图在非选择性的“真实世界”BC患者队列中研究与辅助TC相关的血液学毒性。方法:我们回顾了来自siio - libanes医院(HSL)和圣保罗国立癌症研究所(ICESP)肿瘤中心的患者的电子病历。纳入分析的患者在确定的乳房手术后接受TC方案的辅助化疗。结果:95例患者纳入我们的分析。中位年龄为55.5岁。所有患者均表现良好(ECOG 0或1),绝大多数患者无合并症。大多数患者接受4个化疗周期(80%)。我们的队列中有85例患者的粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)给药数据。在31例患者中,G-CSF被用作初级预防,在13例患者中,在先前发生发热性中性粒细胞减少症后,G-CSF被用作二级预防。总的来说,15名妇女(15.8%)有记录的FN发作。在接受G-CSF作为初级预防的妇女中,FN率为6.45%(2例)。相比之下,未接受G-CSF一级预防的患者FN率明显较高,为24.07%(13例)。接受G-CSF初级预防的患者发生FN发作的风险较低(p=0.049)。结论:这组非选择性BC患者的发热性中性粒细胞减少率高于先前报道的随机对照试验,这些试验评估了与我们队列中使用的相同剂量和方案的辅助TC方案。G-CSF的初级预防与FN风险降低相关,在接受这种化疗组合的患者的管理中应予以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Febrile Neutropenia Risk with Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) Chemotherapy Regimen in Two Brazilians Cancer Centers
Introduction: In selected patients diagnosed with Breast Cancer (BC), adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce local and systemic recurrence risk, as well as cancer death rate. The combination of Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide (TC) is a well-recognized effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Nonetheless, a considerable high rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) is associated with this regimen. We sought to investigate hematologic toxicity associated with adjuvant TC in a non-selected, “real world” cohort of BC patients. Methods: We reviewed the electronic medical records of patients who presented to the Oncology Center from Hospital Sirio-Libanes (HSL) and Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP). Patients included in the analysis received adjuvant chemotherapy with TC regimen after definitive breast surgery. Results: 95 patients with were included in our analysis. Median age was 55.5 years. All patients had a good performance status (either ECOG 0 or 1), and the great majority had no comorbidities. Most patients received 4 cycles of chemotherapy (80%). Data on granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration was available in 85 patients from our cohort. G-CSF was used as primary prophylaxis in 31 patients, and as secondary prophylaxis in 13 patients, following a prior episode of febrile neutropenia. Overall, fifteen women (15.8%) had a documented FN episode. Among women who received G-CSF as primary prophylaxis, the rate of FN was 6.45% (2 patients). In contrast, among patients who did not receive primary prophylaxis with G-CSF, FN rate was considerably higher, namely 24.07% (13 patients). Patients who received primary prophylaxis with G-CSF had a statistically significant lower risk of experiencing a FN episode (p=0.049). Conclusion: Febrile Neutropenia rate in this group of non-selected BC patients was higher than previous reported on randomized controlled trials that evaluated adjuvant TC regimen in the same dosing and schedule as used in our cohort. Primary prophylaxis with G-CSF was associated with a statistically significant lower risk of FN and should be considered in the management of patients who receive this chemotherapy combination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Time-restricted Eating to Address Cancer-related Fatigue among Cancer Survivors: A Single-arm Pilot Study. PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF MOLECULAR GENETIC MARKERS: Ki67, Bcl2, and p53 IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALLY ADVANCED CERVICAL CANCER Role of Vitronectin as a potential Serum Biomarker for Breast Cancer Prognosis Botulinum Toxin Usefulness in the Treatment of Drooling in Childhood Breast cancer risk factors, prevention and patients empowerment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1