3 IU静脉注射催产素加7 IU催产素输注与10 IU肌注催产素在分娩第三期预防产后出血的随机对照试验

Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.15296/ijwhr.2021.32
Aruna M Biradar, Rajasri G Yaliwal, S. Kori, Sangamesh S Mathapati, Shobha S Shiragur, S. Mudanur
{"title":"3 IU静脉注射催产素加7 IU催产素输注与10 IU肌注催产素在分娩第三期预防产后出血的随机对照试验","authors":"Aruna M Biradar, Rajasri G Yaliwal, S. Kori, Sangamesh S Mathapati, Shobha S Shiragur, S. Mudanur","doi":"10.15296/ijwhr.2021.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Intravenous (IV) oxytocin during vaginal delivery has been rarely used since an intramuscular (IM) route or IV infusion have been preferred in this regard. The trial aimed to compare the low-dose IV bolus 3 IU of oxytocin, along with 7 IU oxytocin infusion with 10 IU oxytocin infusion in cesarean section. Materials and Methods: A parallel control randomized study was conducted on a total of 320 consenting term pregnant women based on the inclusion criteria. The participants were randomized into either 3 IU IV bolus and 7 IU infusion of oxytocin or 10 IU of IM oxytocin following vaginal delivery. The difference in pre- and post-delivery hemoglobin (Hb) levels, tone of the uterus, hemodynamic changes, adverse effects of the drug, and the need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusions were assessed based on the aim of the study. Results: Based on the results, more women with severe blood loss were found in the IM oxytocin group in comparison to the IV bolus with infusion group following vaginal delivery. In addition, more women had a drop in the Hb of 3 gm/dL in the IM oxytocin group compared to the IV bolus-infusion group (11% vs. 4%, odds ratio=0.768, P=0.469) although there was no statistical significance in this respect. The tone of the uterus was firmer in the IV bolus with infusion group at 3 and 5 minutes. Eventually, the difference in hemodynamic changes, side effects, and the need for additional uterotonics or blood transfusions was not significant. Conclusions: In general, an IV bolus of 3 IU with a 7 IU infusion of oxytocin is as safe as and more effective than the IM injection of 10 IU of oxytocin at the time of vaginal delivery for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomised Control Trial of 3 IU Intravenous Oxytocin Bolus With 7 IU Oxytocin Infusion Versus 10 IU Intramuscular Oxytocin in the Third Stage of Labour in the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Aruna M Biradar, Rajasri G Yaliwal, S. Kori, Sangamesh S Mathapati, Shobha S Shiragur, S. Mudanur\",\"doi\":\"10.15296/ijwhr.2021.32\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Intravenous (IV) oxytocin during vaginal delivery has been rarely used since an intramuscular (IM) route or IV infusion have been preferred in this regard. The trial aimed to compare the low-dose IV bolus 3 IU of oxytocin, along with 7 IU oxytocin infusion with 10 IU oxytocin infusion in cesarean section. Materials and Methods: A parallel control randomized study was conducted on a total of 320 consenting term pregnant women based on the inclusion criteria. The participants were randomized into either 3 IU IV bolus and 7 IU infusion of oxytocin or 10 IU of IM oxytocin following vaginal delivery. The difference in pre- and post-delivery hemoglobin (Hb) levels, tone of the uterus, hemodynamic changes, adverse effects of the drug, and the need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusions were assessed based on the aim of the study. Results: Based on the results, more women with severe blood loss were found in the IM oxytocin group in comparison to the IV bolus with infusion group following vaginal delivery. In addition, more women had a drop in the Hb of 3 gm/dL in the IM oxytocin group compared to the IV bolus-infusion group (11% vs. 4%, odds ratio=0.768, P=0.469) although there was no statistical significance in this respect. The tone of the uterus was firmer in the IV bolus with infusion group at 3 and 5 minutes. Eventually, the difference in hemodynamic changes, side effects, and the need for additional uterotonics or blood transfusions was not significant. Conclusions: In general, an IV bolus of 3 IU with a 7 IU infusion of oxytocin is as safe as and more effective than the IM injection of 10 IU of oxytocin at the time of vaginal delivery for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.32\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:阴道分娩时静脉注射(IV)催产素很少使用,因为肌肉注射(IM)途径或静脉输注在这方面是首选的。该试验旨在比较剖宫产术中低剂量静脉注射3iu催产素,同时输注7iu催产素和输注10iu催产素的效果。材料与方法:根据纳入标准,对320名同意的足月孕妇进行平行对照随机研究。参与者被随机分为阴道分娩后静脉注射催产素3 IU和输注催产素7 IU或静脉注射催产素10 IU。根据研究目的评估产前和产后血红蛋白(Hb)水平的差异、子宫张力、血流动力学变化、药物的不良反应以及是否需要额外的子宫强张和输血。结果:根据结果,与阴道分娩后静脉注射催产素组相比,IM催产素组出现严重失血的妇女更多。此外,与静脉注射催产素组相比,注射催产素组的女性Hb下降了3 gm/dL (11% vs. 4%,优势比=0.768,P=0.469),尽管在这方面没有统计学意义。静脉滴注组子宫张力在3、5分钟时较明显。最终,在血流动力学改变、副作用和需要额外的子宫强张或输血方面的差异并不显著。结论:一般情况下,阴道分娩时静脉注射3iu并输注7iu催产素与静脉注射10iu催产素预防产后出血一样安全且更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Randomised Control Trial of 3 IU Intravenous Oxytocin Bolus With 7 IU Oxytocin Infusion Versus 10 IU Intramuscular Oxytocin in the Third Stage of Labour in the Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage
Objectives: Intravenous (IV) oxytocin during vaginal delivery has been rarely used since an intramuscular (IM) route or IV infusion have been preferred in this regard. The trial aimed to compare the low-dose IV bolus 3 IU of oxytocin, along with 7 IU oxytocin infusion with 10 IU oxytocin infusion in cesarean section. Materials and Methods: A parallel control randomized study was conducted on a total of 320 consenting term pregnant women based on the inclusion criteria. The participants were randomized into either 3 IU IV bolus and 7 IU infusion of oxytocin or 10 IU of IM oxytocin following vaginal delivery. The difference in pre- and post-delivery hemoglobin (Hb) levels, tone of the uterus, hemodynamic changes, adverse effects of the drug, and the need for additional uterotonics and blood transfusions were assessed based on the aim of the study. Results: Based on the results, more women with severe blood loss were found in the IM oxytocin group in comparison to the IV bolus with infusion group following vaginal delivery. In addition, more women had a drop in the Hb of 3 gm/dL in the IM oxytocin group compared to the IV bolus-infusion group (11% vs. 4%, odds ratio=0.768, P=0.469) although there was no statistical significance in this respect. The tone of the uterus was firmer in the IV bolus with infusion group at 3 and 5 minutes. Eventually, the difference in hemodynamic changes, side effects, and the need for additional uterotonics or blood transfusions was not significant. Conclusions: In general, an IV bolus of 3 IU with a 7 IU infusion of oxytocin is as safe as and more effective than the IM injection of 10 IU of oxytocin at the time of vaginal delivery for the prevention of postpartum hemorrhage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1