上皮关闭和上皮上角膜胶原交联治疗儿童圆锥角膜的疗效

M. Eraslan, E. Toker, Eren Çerman, Deniz Ozarslan
{"title":"上皮关闭和上皮上角膜胶原交联治疗儿童圆锥角膜的疗效","authors":"M. Eraslan, E. Toker, Eren Çerman, Deniz Ozarslan","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet A epithelium-off (epi-off) and epithelium-on (epi-on) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in progressive pediatric keratoconus. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 27 patients aged 18 years or younger (12–18 years) diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with epi-off (n=18 eyes) or epi-on (n=18 eyes) CXL were included in this study. All patients were followed up for 24 months postoperatively. Results: At 24-month follow-up, the mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from 0.24±0.17 to 0.17±0.11 logMAR in the epi-off group (P=0.032). In the epi-on group, CDVA improved from 0.33±0.23 to 0.26±0.20 logMAR (P=0.012), but the improvement was not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). In the epi-off group, all mean K values improved: K1 (&Dgr;=−0.63 D, P=0.024), K2 (&Dgr;=−0.73 D, P=0.008), and Kmax (&Dgr;=−1.4 D, P=0.035), whereas in the epi-on group, Kmax and K2 did not change significantly and K1 (&Dgr;=0.68 D, P=0.029) significantly worsened. Postoperative mild corneal haze occurred in 5 eyes (28%) in the epi-off group. No postoperative complications were observed in the epi-on group. In 94.4% of the epi-off group, keratoconus regressed (44.4%) or stabilized (50.0%), whereas in the epi-on group, only 66.6% regressed (33.3%) or stabilized (33.3%), and the difference was significant (P=0.038). Conclusions: The efficacy of the epi-on procedure in terms of its ability to halt keratoconus progression appears to be 0.70 of the efficacy of epi-off CXL.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"74 2 1","pages":"155–161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Epithelium-Off and Epithelium-On Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus\",\"authors\":\"M. Eraslan, E. Toker, Eren Çerman, Deniz Ozarslan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet A epithelium-off (epi-off) and epithelium-on (epi-on) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in progressive pediatric keratoconus. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 27 patients aged 18 years or younger (12–18 years) diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with epi-off (n=18 eyes) or epi-on (n=18 eyes) CXL were included in this study. All patients were followed up for 24 months postoperatively. Results: At 24-month follow-up, the mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from 0.24±0.17 to 0.17±0.11 logMAR in the epi-off group (P=0.032). In the epi-on group, CDVA improved from 0.33±0.23 to 0.26±0.20 logMAR (P=0.012), but the improvement was not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). In the epi-off group, all mean K values improved: K1 (&Dgr;=−0.63 D, P=0.024), K2 (&Dgr;=−0.73 D, P=0.008), and Kmax (&Dgr;=−1.4 D, P=0.035), whereas in the epi-on group, Kmax and K2 did not change significantly and K1 (&Dgr;=0.68 D, P=0.029) significantly worsened. Postoperative mild corneal haze occurred in 5 eyes (28%) in the epi-off group. No postoperative complications were observed in the epi-on group. In 94.4% of the epi-off group, keratoconus regressed (44.4%) or stabilized (50.0%), whereas in the epi-on group, only 66.6% regressed (33.3%) or stabilized (33.3%), and the difference was significant (P=0.038). Conclusions: The efficacy of the epi-on procedure in terms of its ability to halt keratoconus progression appears to be 0.70 of the efficacy of epi-off CXL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"74 2 1\",\"pages\":\"155–161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目的:评价核黄素/紫外线A上皮关闭(epi-off)和上皮连接(epi-on)角膜胶原交联(CXL)治疗进展性儿童圆锥角膜的疗效。方法:选取年龄在18岁及以下(12-18岁)的进行性圆锥角膜病变患者27例,36只眼,分别使用epi-off (n=18眼)或epi-on (n=18眼)CXL。术后随访24个月。结果:随访24个月,epi-off组平均矫正距离视力(CDVA)由0.24±0.17 logMAR改善至0.17±0.11 logMAR (P=0.032)。epi-on组CDVA由0.33±0.23 logMAR改善至0.26±0.20 logMAR (P=0.012),组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。epi-off组平均K值均有改善,K1 (&Dgr = - 0.63 D, P=0.024)、K2 (&Dgr = - 0.73 D, P=0.008)、Kmax (&Dgr = - 1.4 D, P=0.035),而epi-on组Kmax和K2变化不显著,K1 (&Dgr =0.68 D, P=0.029)显著恶化。epi-off组术后出现轻度角膜混浊5眼(28%)。epi-on组无术后并发症。epi-off组94.4%的患者圆锥角膜消退(44.4%)或稳定(50.0%),而epi-on组66.6%的患者角膜消退(33.3%)或稳定(33.3%),差异有统计学意义(P=0.038)。结论:在阻止圆锥角膜进展的能力方面,epi-on手术的疗效似乎是epi-off CXL疗效的0.70。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Epithelium-Off and Epithelium-On Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of riboflavin/ultraviolet A epithelium-off (epi-off) and epithelium-on (epi-on) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) in progressive pediatric keratoconus. Methods: Thirty-six eyes of 27 patients aged 18 years or younger (12–18 years) diagnosed with progressive keratoconus and treated with epi-off (n=18 eyes) or epi-on (n=18 eyes) CXL were included in this study. All patients were followed up for 24 months postoperatively. Results: At 24-month follow-up, the mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved from 0.24±0.17 to 0.17±0.11 logMAR in the epi-off group (P=0.032). In the epi-on group, CDVA improved from 0.33±0.23 to 0.26±0.20 logMAR (P=0.012), but the improvement was not significantly different between groups (P>0.05). In the epi-off group, all mean K values improved: K1 (&Dgr;=−0.63 D, P=0.024), K2 (&Dgr;=−0.73 D, P=0.008), and Kmax (&Dgr;=−1.4 D, P=0.035), whereas in the epi-on group, Kmax and K2 did not change significantly and K1 (&Dgr;=0.68 D, P=0.029) significantly worsened. Postoperative mild corneal haze occurred in 5 eyes (28%) in the epi-off group. No postoperative complications were observed in the epi-on group. In 94.4% of the epi-off group, keratoconus regressed (44.4%) or stabilized (50.0%), whereas in the epi-on group, only 66.6% regressed (33.3%) or stabilized (33.3%), and the difference was significant (P=0.038). Conclusions: The efficacy of the epi-on procedure in terms of its ability to halt keratoconus progression appears to be 0.70 of the efficacy of epi-off CXL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Acremonium Species Positive Keratitis Managed in a Tertiary Eye Care Center Efficacy of the Image-Guided Alignment System for a Four-Haptic Hydrophobic Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens Evaluation of Ocular Surface Characteristics in Dry Eye Disease With and Without Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Comparative Study Change in Risk Score and Behaviors of Soft Contact Lens Wearers After Targeted Patient Education Corneal Response to Scleral Contact Lens Wear in Keratoconus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1