{"title":"嘉宾专栏:第三个P=?NP调查","authors":"W. Gasarch","doi":"10.1145/3319627.3319636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2001 I (innocently!) asked Lane if I could write an article for his SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column that would be a poll of what computer scientists (and others) thought about P=?NP and related issues. It was to be an objective record of subjective opinions. I asked (by telegraph in those days) over 100 theorists. Exactly 100 responded, which made taking percentages very easy. That poll appeared in the SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column in 2002 (I call it the 2002 poll even though people answered it in 2001). The Wikipedia page on P=?NP links to it. That poll's readership and popularity have exceeded my wildest dreams.","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guest Column: The Third P=?NP Poll\",\"authors\":\"W. Gasarch\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3319627.3319636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2001 I (innocently!) asked Lane if I could write an article for his SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column that would be a poll of what computer scientists (and others) thought about P=?NP and related issues. It was to be an objective record of subjective opinions. I asked (by telegraph in those days) over 100 theorists. Exactly 100 responded, which made taking percentages very easy. That poll appeared in the SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column in 2002 (I call it the 2002 poll even though people answered it in 2001). The Wikipedia page on P=?NP links to it. That poll's readership and popularity have exceeded my wildest dreams.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SIGACT News\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SIGACT News\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3319627.3319636\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3319627.3319636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In 2001 I (innocently!) asked Lane if I could write an article for his SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column that would be a poll of what computer scientists (and others) thought about P=?NP and related issues. It was to be an objective record of subjective opinions. I asked (by telegraph in those days) over 100 theorists. Exactly 100 responded, which made taking percentages very easy. That poll appeared in the SIGACT News Complexity Theory Column in 2002 (I call it the 2002 poll even though people answered it in 2001). The Wikipedia page on P=?NP links to it. That poll's readership and popularity have exceeded my wildest dreams.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
