不只是黑与白,而是不同的灰色阴影:法律分割及其对欧洲劳动力市场分割的影响

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q1 ECONOMICS International Labour Review Pub Date : 2021-09-30 DOI:10.1111/ilr.12336
Irene DINGELDEY, Jean-Yves GERLITZ
{"title":"不只是黑与白,而是不同的灰色阴影:法律分割及其对欧洲劳动力市场分割的影响","authors":"Irene DINGELDEY,&nbsp;Jean-Yves GERLITZ","doi":"10.1111/ilr.12336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article studies the impact of employment law on de facto labour market segmentation for 22 European countries from 1991 to 2014. Applying the concept of legal segmentation, the authors distinguish between the standard-setting (protective), privileging and equalizing functions of employment law and use descriptive and multivariate statistics to indicate their effects on overall employment, and male and female standard and non-standard employment. High privileging, in combination with high standard-setting, is found to favour male standard employment and female non-standard employment, while the equalizing function, aimed at improving the protection of women and other marginalized groups, actually increases male non-standard employment.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47216,"journal":{"name":"International Labour Review","volume":"161 4","pages":"593-613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12336","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not just black and white, but different shades of grey: Legal segmentation and its effect on labour market segmentation in Europe\",\"authors\":\"Irene DINGELDEY,&nbsp;Jean-Yves GERLITZ\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ilr.12336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article studies the impact of employment law on de facto labour market segmentation for 22 European countries from 1991 to 2014. Applying the concept of legal segmentation, the authors distinguish between the standard-setting (protective), privileging and equalizing functions of employment law and use descriptive and multivariate statistics to indicate their effects on overall employment, and male and female standard and non-standard employment. High privileging, in combination with high standard-setting, is found to favour male standard employment and female non-standard employment, while the equalizing function, aimed at improving the protection of women and other marginalized groups, actually increases male non-standard employment.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Labour Review\",\"volume\":\"161 4\",\"pages\":\"593-613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ilr.12336\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Labour Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12336\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Labour Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ilr.12336","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文研究了1991年至2014年22个欧洲国家就业法对事实上的劳动力市场分割的影响。运用法律分割的概念,作者区分了就业法的标准制定(保护)、特权和平等功能,并使用描述性和多变量统计来表明它们对总体就业的影响,以及男性和女性标准和非标准就业。人们发现,高度特权加上高标准,有利于男性的标准就业和女性的非标准就业,而旨在改善保护妇女和其他边缘群体的均衡功能实际上增加了男性的非标准就业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not just black and white, but different shades of grey: Legal segmentation and its effect on labour market segmentation in Europe

This article studies the impact of employment law on de facto labour market segmentation for 22 European countries from 1991 to 2014. Applying the concept of legal segmentation, the authors distinguish between the standard-setting (protective), privileging and equalizing functions of employment law and use descriptive and multivariate statistics to indicate their effects on overall employment, and male and female standard and non-standard employment. High privileging, in combination with high standard-setting, is found to favour male standard employment and female non-standard employment, while the equalizing function, aimed at improving the protection of women and other marginalized groups, actually increases male non-standard employment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The International Labour Review is the world"s leading multidisciplinary journal of labour market institutions and economics. Its aim is to advance academic research and inform policy debate and decision-making in these fields by bringing together the original thinking of lawyers, economists, sociologists, political scientists and industrial relations specialists on a broad range of labour market policy and social protection concerns. The International Labour Review also features concise reports on current developments considered to be of particular interest to those working in these fields and reviews of recent major publications. It is committed to an editorial policy that combines accessibility with rigorous, insightful analysis and the highest scholarly standards.
期刊最新文献
The persistence of informality in paid domestic work in Argentina Introduction: The formalization of paid domestic work – Current trajectories and challenges ahead Issue Information – TOC From dead letter to functional policy? Domestic workers' rights and “disformality” in Peru Domestic workers' organizations and participatory approaches to labour standards enforcement: The case of Jamaica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1