关于中伏尔加河、卡马和跨乌拉尔的新石器时代的争议问题(op: Nikitin V.V.)在石器和金属时期之间。伏尔加河文化历史共同体的中伏尔加河变异。Yoshkar-Ola, 2017年。ISBN 978-5-906949-18-9)

A. Vybornov, V. Stavitsky
{"title":"关于中伏尔加河、卡马和跨乌拉尔的新石器时代的争议问题(op: Nikitin V.V.)在石器和金属时期之间。伏尔加河文化历史共同体的中伏尔加河变异。Yoshkar-Ola, 2017年。ISBN 978-5-906949-18-9)","authors":"A. Vybornov, V. Stavitsky","doi":"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the controversial issues of studying the Eneolithic of the forest Volga Region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals. The main results of the study of the early metal epoch of the Middle Volga Region, articulated in the monograph by V.V. Nikitin, are considered. The conclusions of the author of the mono-graph are based on a considerable source base. The materials were analyzed both by individual housing struc-tures and by complexes. A more scrupulous analysis is devoted to the pottery items, as a priority in distinguishing the Eneolithic cultures. Stone industries are more prone to the territorial specifics associated with raw material resources. The sections of the book allow researchers of the adjacent territories to envision the cultural specificity of the Middle Volga antiquities against the background of the Eneolithic cultures of the Volga-Kama region. The monograph proposes to distinguish a special Maidan Culture within the Volosovo historical and cultural commu-nity. The paper touches upon the aspect of the relationship between the cultural area and community. Peculiari-ties of the origins of the Early Eneolithic cultures in the Upper Volga region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals are ob-served. Local and foreign components are taken into account. General and specific chronological boundaries of the appearance and development in different territories are identified, and their reasons are explained. Attention is drawn to the fact that the complexes preceding the Volosovо or Ayat structures belong to the Late Neolithic or Early Eneolithic. The processes of intercultural interaction between the Trans-Urals and Cis-Urals cultures are recorded both in the transition period from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic and in the later period. The significant influence of the bearers of the forest-steppe zone cultures on the northern neighbors is ascertained. A more mo-saic cultural diversity is recorded in the southern territories when compared with the cultures of the forest belt. The question of whether the Eneolithic inhabitants of this region practiced agriculture or stock rearing remains controversial. The least developed are the aspects related to both the social structure and the further fate of the tribes of the early metal epoch. Reconstructions of components of the spiritual culture of the Eneolithic population are highly hypothetical.","PeriodicalId":36692,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversial issues of the Eneolithic of the Middle Volga, Kama and Trans-Urals (op.: Nikitin V.V. Between the Stone and Metal Periods. Middle Volga Variation of the Volosovo Cultural and Historical Community. Yoshkar-Ola, 2017. 765 p. ISBN 978-5-906949-18-9)\",\"authors\":\"A. Vybornov, V. Stavitsky\",\"doi\":\"10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to analyze the controversial issues of studying the Eneolithic of the forest Volga Region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals. The main results of the study of the early metal epoch of the Middle Volga Region, articulated in the monograph by V.V. Nikitin, are considered. The conclusions of the author of the mono-graph are based on a considerable source base. The materials were analyzed both by individual housing struc-tures and by complexes. A more scrupulous analysis is devoted to the pottery items, as a priority in distinguishing the Eneolithic cultures. Stone industries are more prone to the territorial specifics associated with raw material resources. The sections of the book allow researchers of the adjacent territories to envision the cultural specificity of the Middle Volga antiquities against the background of the Eneolithic cultures of the Volga-Kama region. The monograph proposes to distinguish a special Maidan Culture within the Volosovo historical and cultural commu-nity. The paper touches upon the aspect of the relationship between the cultural area and community. Peculiari-ties of the origins of the Early Eneolithic cultures in the Upper Volga region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals are ob-served. Local and foreign components are taken into account. General and specific chronological boundaries of the appearance and development in different territories are identified, and their reasons are explained. Attention is drawn to the fact that the complexes preceding the Volosovо or Ayat structures belong to the Late Neolithic or Early Eneolithic. The processes of intercultural interaction between the Trans-Urals and Cis-Urals cultures are recorded both in the transition period from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic and in the later period. The significant influence of the bearers of the forest-steppe zone cultures on the northern neighbors is ascertained. A more mo-saic cultural diversity is recorded in the southern territories when compared with the cultures of the forest belt. The question of whether the Eneolithic inhabitants of this region practiced agriculture or stock rearing remains controversial. The least developed are the aspects related to both the social structure and the further fate of the tribes of the early metal epoch. Reconstructions of components of the spiritual culture of the Eneolithic population are highly hypothetical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是分析森林伏尔加河地区、普里卡米耶地区和乌拉尔外地区新石器时代研究中存在的争议问题。对伏尔加河中部地区早期金属时代研究的主要结果,在V.V. Nikitin的专著中进行了阐述。该专著作者的结论是以相当多的资料为基础的。对材料进行了单独的房屋结构和复合结构的分析。作为区分新石器时代文化的优先事项,对陶器物品进行了更细致的分析。石材行业更容易受到与原材料资源相关的地域特殊性的影响。本书的章节允许相邻地区的研究人员在伏尔加-卡马地区新石器时代文化的背景下设想伏尔加中部古物的文化特殊性。该专著建议在Volosovo历史和文化社区中区分一种特殊的独立广场文化。本文从文化区与社区关系的角度进行了探讨。观察了伏尔加河上游地区、普里卡米耶地区和乌拉尔外地区早期新石器时代文化起源的特殊性。考虑到本地和外国成分。确定了不同地区出现和发展的一般和具体的时间界限,并解释了其原因。值得注意的是,volosovvir或Ayat结构之前的复合体属于新石器时代晚期或新石器时代早期。跨乌拉尔文化和顺乌拉尔文化之间的文化互动过程记录在新石器时代到新石器时代的过渡时期和后期。确定了森林草原带文化的承育者对北部邻区文化的显著影响。与森林地带的文化相比,南部地区的文化多样性更为丰富。这个地区的新石器时代居民是否从事农业或饲养牲畜的问题仍然存在争议。最不发达的是与早期金属时代部落的社会结构和未来命运有关的方面。对新石器时代人口精神文化组成部分的重建是高度假设的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Controversial issues of the Eneolithic of the Middle Volga, Kama and Trans-Urals (op.: Nikitin V.V. Between the Stone and Metal Periods. Middle Volga Variation of the Volosovo Cultural and Historical Community. Yoshkar-Ola, 2017. 765 p. ISBN 978-5-906949-18-9)
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the controversial issues of studying the Eneolithic of the forest Volga Region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals. The main results of the study of the early metal epoch of the Middle Volga Region, articulated in the monograph by V.V. Nikitin, are considered. The conclusions of the author of the mono-graph are based on a considerable source base. The materials were analyzed both by individual housing struc-tures and by complexes. A more scrupulous analysis is devoted to the pottery items, as a priority in distinguishing the Eneolithic cultures. Stone industries are more prone to the territorial specifics associated with raw material resources. The sections of the book allow researchers of the adjacent territories to envision the cultural specificity of the Middle Volga antiquities against the background of the Eneolithic cultures of the Volga-Kama region. The monograph proposes to distinguish a special Maidan Culture within the Volosovo historical and cultural commu-nity. The paper touches upon the aspect of the relationship between the cultural area and community. Peculiari-ties of the origins of the Early Eneolithic cultures in the Upper Volga region, Prikamye, and Trans-Urals are ob-served. Local and foreign components are taken into account. General and specific chronological boundaries of the appearance and development in different territories are identified, and their reasons are explained. Attention is drawn to the fact that the complexes preceding the Volosovо or Ayat structures belong to the Late Neolithic or Early Eneolithic. The processes of intercultural interaction between the Trans-Urals and Cis-Urals cultures are recorded both in the transition period from the Neolithic to the Eneolithic and in the later period. The significant influence of the bearers of the forest-steppe zone cultures on the northern neighbors is ascertained. A more mo-saic cultural diversity is recorded in the southern territories when compared with the cultures of the forest belt. The question of whether the Eneolithic inhabitants of this region practiced agriculture or stock rearing remains controversial. The least developed are the aspects related to both the social structure and the further fate of the tribes of the early metal epoch. Reconstructions of components of the spiritual culture of the Eneolithic population are highly hypothetical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii
Vestnik Archeologii, Antropologii i Etnografii Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Russia Germans in the Turkestan Governorate-General: resettlement and economic activity (the last third of the 19th — beginning of the 20th century) On the lunula stone pendants and their taiga counterparts When the connectivity is lost: infrastructural uncertainty and reaction to it amongst the tundra nomads of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug On the status and selectivity of the infant burials of the Yamnaya Archaeological Culture of the Southern Urals (based on the excavation materials of the burial mound No. 1 of the Boldyrevo-4 group) Modernisation of the historical memory and national identity in the Republic of Kazakhstan: a means of the formation and translation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1