苹果采后病原菌拮抗优势附生菌群的研究

Aqleema Banoo, Efath Shahnaz, B. Saba, Ay, R. S. Rasool, Taibah Bashir, R. Latif
{"title":"苹果采后病原菌拮抗优势附生菌群的研究","authors":"Aqleema Banoo, Efath Shahnaz, B. Saba, Ay, R. S. Rasool, Taibah Bashir, R. Latif","doi":"10.35248/2157-7471.20.11.512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apple (Malus domestica Borkh) is an important horticultural crop that is affected by the number of diseases round the year. The fruit is particularly susceptible to a number of pathogens both pre- and post-harvest. Management of these diseases is based mostly on the application of synthetic fungicides with obvious disadvantages of environmental pollution, health hazards, pathogen resistance, etc. In the present study, eleven epiphytes were isolated using potato dextrose agar, nutrient agar and yeast maltose agar media. Amongst them, five fungal isolates viz., Aspergillus sp. (I1), Penicillium sp. (I2), Fusarium sp. (I3), Rhizopus sp. (I4) and Alternaria sp. (I5) and six bacterial isolates viz., Pseudomonas sp. (I6), Pseudomonas sp. (I7), Bacillus sp. (I8), Bacillus sp. (I9), Staphylococcus sp. (I10) and Micrococcus sp. (I11) were predominantly noticed under all the three methods (leaf impression, serial dilution and fruit washing) and were hence, used for further studies. The highest average colony count of 3.62 colonies/cm2 was recorded in fruit washing method followed by leaf impression (3.17) and lowest in serial dilution method (2.12). The in vitro screening of various bacterial and fungal epiphytes revealed that isolates of Pseudomonas sp. (I6) and Bacillus (I8 and I9) were the only bacterial strains capable of inhibiting the growth of all the test pathogens using dual culture method. Assays on wounded apples revealed that Pseudomonas sp. I6 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Penicillium sp. and Fusarium sp., Bacillus sp. I9 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Alternaria sp., whereas, Bacillus sp. I8 at 107 cfu/ml was most effective antagonist against Diplodia sp. The present study revealed that the antagonists were more or less efficient towards each pathogen and can be utilized for the management of post-harvest diseases of apple.","PeriodicalId":16845,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studies on Predominant Epiphytic Micro-flora as Antagonists to Postharvest Pathogens of Apple\",\"authors\":\"Aqleema Banoo, Efath Shahnaz, B. Saba, Ay, R. S. Rasool, Taibah Bashir, R. Latif\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2157-7471.20.11.512\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Apple (Malus domestica Borkh) is an important horticultural crop that is affected by the number of diseases round the year. The fruit is particularly susceptible to a number of pathogens both pre- and post-harvest. Management of these diseases is based mostly on the application of synthetic fungicides with obvious disadvantages of environmental pollution, health hazards, pathogen resistance, etc. In the present study, eleven epiphytes were isolated using potato dextrose agar, nutrient agar and yeast maltose agar media. Amongst them, five fungal isolates viz., Aspergillus sp. (I1), Penicillium sp. (I2), Fusarium sp. (I3), Rhizopus sp. (I4) and Alternaria sp. (I5) and six bacterial isolates viz., Pseudomonas sp. (I6), Pseudomonas sp. (I7), Bacillus sp. (I8), Bacillus sp. (I9), Staphylococcus sp. (I10) and Micrococcus sp. (I11) were predominantly noticed under all the three methods (leaf impression, serial dilution and fruit washing) and were hence, used for further studies. The highest average colony count of 3.62 colonies/cm2 was recorded in fruit washing method followed by leaf impression (3.17) and lowest in serial dilution method (2.12). The in vitro screening of various bacterial and fungal epiphytes revealed that isolates of Pseudomonas sp. (I6) and Bacillus (I8 and I9) were the only bacterial strains capable of inhibiting the growth of all the test pathogens using dual culture method. Assays on wounded apples revealed that Pseudomonas sp. I6 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Penicillium sp. and Fusarium sp., Bacillus sp. I9 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Alternaria sp., whereas, Bacillus sp. I8 at 107 cfu/ml was most effective antagonist against Diplodia sp. The present study revealed that the antagonists were more or less efficient towards each pathogen and can be utilized for the management of post-harvest diseases of apple.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7471.20.11.512\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Pathology & Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2157-7471.20.11.512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

苹果(Malus domestica Borkh)是一种重要的园艺作物,一年四季都受病害的影响。水果在收获前和收获后都特别容易受到许多病原体的影响。这些病害的治理多以应用合成杀菌剂为主,但其环境污染、危害健康、病原体耐药等缺点明显。本研究采用马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂、营养琼脂和酵母麦芽糖琼脂培养基分离了11株附生植物。其中,曲霉(I1)、青霉(I2)、镰刀菌(I3)、根霉(I4)、互菌(I5)等5株真菌和假单胞菌(I6)、假单胞菌(I7)、芽孢杆菌(I8)、芽孢杆菌(I9)、葡萄球菌(I10)、微球菌(I11)等6株细菌在叶片压印、连续稀释、洗果等3种方法下均表现突出,值得进一步研究。平均菌落数最高的是洗果法,为3.62个/cm2,其次是叶片压印法(3.17个),最低的是连续稀释法(2.12个)。多种细菌和真菌附生菌的体外筛选表明,采用双重培养法,只有假单胞菌(Pseudomonas sp., I6)和芽孢杆菌(Bacillus, I8和I9)能抑制所有试验病原菌的生长。在伤苹果上的试验表明,107 cfu/ml的假单胞菌sp. I6对青霉菌和镰刀菌有效,107 cfu/ml的芽孢杆菌sp. I9对交替菌有效,107 cfu/ml的芽孢杆菌sp. I8对双plodia sp.最有效。本研究表明,这些拮抗剂对每一种病原菌都有或多或少的拮抗效果,可用于苹果采后病害的防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studies on Predominant Epiphytic Micro-flora as Antagonists to Postharvest Pathogens of Apple
Apple (Malus domestica Borkh) is an important horticultural crop that is affected by the number of diseases round the year. The fruit is particularly susceptible to a number of pathogens both pre- and post-harvest. Management of these diseases is based mostly on the application of synthetic fungicides with obvious disadvantages of environmental pollution, health hazards, pathogen resistance, etc. In the present study, eleven epiphytes were isolated using potato dextrose agar, nutrient agar and yeast maltose agar media. Amongst them, five fungal isolates viz., Aspergillus sp. (I1), Penicillium sp. (I2), Fusarium sp. (I3), Rhizopus sp. (I4) and Alternaria sp. (I5) and six bacterial isolates viz., Pseudomonas sp. (I6), Pseudomonas sp. (I7), Bacillus sp. (I8), Bacillus sp. (I9), Staphylococcus sp. (I10) and Micrococcus sp. (I11) were predominantly noticed under all the three methods (leaf impression, serial dilution and fruit washing) and were hence, used for further studies. The highest average colony count of 3.62 colonies/cm2 was recorded in fruit washing method followed by leaf impression (3.17) and lowest in serial dilution method (2.12). The in vitro screening of various bacterial and fungal epiphytes revealed that isolates of Pseudomonas sp. (I6) and Bacillus (I8 and I9) were the only bacterial strains capable of inhibiting the growth of all the test pathogens using dual culture method. Assays on wounded apples revealed that Pseudomonas sp. I6 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Penicillium sp. and Fusarium sp., Bacillus sp. I9 at 107 cfu/ml was effective antagonist against Alternaria sp., whereas, Bacillus sp. I8 at 107 cfu/ml was most effective antagonist against Diplodia sp. The present study revealed that the antagonists were more or less efficient towards each pathogen and can be utilized for the management of post-harvest diseases of apple.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antibacterial Effect of Pongamia pinnata Leaf Extract against Some Human Pathogenic Bacteria Evaluation of Fungicides for the Management of Tef Leaf Rust (Uromyces eragrostidis) in Tef at East and North Shoa, Ethiopia Identification of Stripe Rust (Puccinia striiformis F. sp. Tritici) Resistance in the Ethiopian Wheat Landraces Genomic discoveries advance the battle against black rot in crucifers Overview on Agriculture and Plant Diseases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1