伊尔夫20世纪30年代的《速写本》作为社会现实主义话语形成的证据

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Chinese Semiotic Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-28 DOI:10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-59-65
K. Pozdnyakov
{"title":"伊尔夫20世纪30年代的《速写本》作为社会现实主义话语形成的证据","authors":"K. Pozdnyakov","doi":"10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-59-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article theme is topical for the reason that Ilya Ilf in Zapisnye knizhki criticizes the socialist realism the art that propagandized and did not pay attention to the artistic expression quality and originality. In recent decades we can witness return of social realistic writing in the works of such authors as A. Ivanov, Z. Prilepin, K. Silvanova and E. Malisova. It appears that in the course of studying the classic Stalinist social realism and critical reflecting it is possible to understand certain patterns of the modern literature process. The research objective was to study Ilf's critique peculiarities and its objects. The article basic research methods comprise semiotic and intertextual analyses. The article beginning considers the context of Ilf's writing in 1930-s years. The stories by Ilf and Petrov, E. Zozulja and Barricady [Barricades] novel by P. Pavlenko were considered as the empiric material. As a result of the research, two thematic dominants of the writing were distinguished: 1) critical judgment of I. Ilfs literature colleagues who started working in social realistic manner in 1930-s years; 2) ironic attacks at the forming social realistic canon. Both of the writing thematic domains are polar opposite to Ilf and Petrov's artistic expression within the specified period. The coauthors created several social realistic texts, and some parts of Odnoetazhnaya America [One-storied America] are semantically compliant with the key Soviet ideology intentions. Thus, it is possible and necessary to distinguish between Ilfs independent creative working and the coauthors late works, where E. Petrov was an evident leader.","PeriodicalId":52036,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Semiotic Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ilf’s «Zapisnye Knizhki» [Sketch Books] of 1930s as the proof of social realistic discourse formation\",\"authors\":\"K. Pozdnyakov\",\"doi\":\"10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-59-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article theme is topical for the reason that Ilya Ilf in Zapisnye knizhki criticizes the socialist realism the art that propagandized and did not pay attention to the artistic expression quality and originality. In recent decades we can witness return of social realistic writing in the works of such authors as A. Ivanov, Z. Prilepin, K. Silvanova and E. Malisova. It appears that in the course of studying the classic Stalinist social realism and critical reflecting it is possible to understand certain patterns of the modern literature process. The research objective was to study Ilf's critique peculiarities and its objects. The article basic research methods comprise semiotic and intertextual analyses. The article beginning considers the context of Ilf's writing in 1930-s years. The stories by Ilf and Petrov, E. Zozulja and Barricady [Barricades] novel by P. Pavlenko were considered as the empiric material. As a result of the research, two thematic dominants of the writing were distinguished: 1) critical judgment of I. Ilfs literature colleagues who started working in social realistic manner in 1930-s years; 2) ironic attacks at the forming social realistic canon. Both of the writing thematic domains are polar opposite to Ilf and Petrov's artistic expression within the specified period. The coauthors created several social realistic texts, and some parts of Odnoetazhnaya America [One-storied America] are semantically compliant with the key Soviet ideology intentions. Thus, it is possible and necessary to distinguish between Ilfs independent creative working and the coauthors late works, where E. Petrov was an evident leader.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Semiotic Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Semiotic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-59-65\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Semiotic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-59-65","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章主题之所以具有话题性,是因为伊里亚·伊里夫在《扎皮斯涅·克尼日奇》中批判了社会主义现实主义所宣传的艺术而不注重艺术表现的品质和独创性。近几十年来,我们可以在A.伊万诺夫、Z.普里列平、K.西尔瓦诺娃和E.马利索娃等作家的作品中看到社会现实主义写作的回归。在研究经典斯大林主义的社会现实主义和批判反思的过程中,似乎可以理解现代文学进程的某些模式。研究目的是研究伊尔夫的批评特点及其对象。本文的基本研究方法包括符号学分析和互文分析。文章首先考察了伊尔夫创作于20世纪30年代的语境。伊尔夫和彼得罗夫的故事、E.佐祖利亚和P.帕夫连科的小说《路障》被认为是经验材料。研究结果区分出两个主题主导:1)20世纪30年代开始以社会现实主义方式工作的伊尔夫文学同事的批判性判断;2)对社会现实主义经典形成的反讽攻击。这两个写作主题领域都与伊尔夫和彼得罗夫在特定时期的艺术表现截然相反。合著者创作了几个社会现实主义文本,《一元化的美国》的某些部分在语义上符合苏联的主要意识形态意图。因此,有可能而且有必要区分伊尔的独立创作和合著者的后期作品,其中E. Petrov是一个明显的领导者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ilf’s «Zapisnye Knizhki» [Sketch Books] of 1930s as the proof of social realistic discourse formation
The article theme is topical for the reason that Ilya Ilf in Zapisnye knizhki criticizes the socialist realism the art that propagandized and did not pay attention to the artistic expression quality and originality. In recent decades we can witness return of social realistic writing in the works of such authors as A. Ivanov, Z. Prilepin, K. Silvanova and E. Malisova. It appears that in the course of studying the classic Stalinist social realism and critical reflecting it is possible to understand certain patterns of the modern literature process. The research objective was to study Ilf's critique peculiarities and its objects. The article basic research methods comprise semiotic and intertextual analyses. The article beginning considers the context of Ilf's writing in 1930-s years. The stories by Ilf and Petrov, E. Zozulja and Barricady [Barricades] novel by P. Pavlenko were considered as the empiric material. As a result of the research, two thematic dominants of the writing were distinguished: 1) critical judgment of I. Ilfs literature colleagues who started working in social realistic manner in 1930-s years; 2) ironic attacks at the forming social realistic canon. Both of the writing thematic domains are polar opposite to Ilf and Petrov's artistic expression within the specified period. The coauthors created several social realistic texts, and some parts of Odnoetazhnaya America [One-storied America] are semantically compliant with the key Soviet ideology intentions. Thus, it is possible and necessary to distinguish between Ilfs independent creative working and the coauthors late works, where E. Petrov was an evident leader.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Semiotic Studies
Chinese Semiotic Studies HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The role of the normative sciences in the evolution of Peirce’s pragmatism Football statues and semiotics The relation of Peirce’s abduction to inference to the best explanation Peirce’s philosophy of language Pragmatism, logic, and manuscript R318
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1