8预后及危害

Philip C. Hannaford
{"title":"8预后及危害","authors":"Philip C. Hannaford","doi":"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80010-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Obstetricians and gynaecologists often have to assess whether an exposure is causing a harmful effect. The first part of this assessment involves considering how the results were obtained: can the type of study determine a cause-and-effect relationship; were <em>all</em> subjects at similar risk of being exposed to the putative harmful exposure and of developing the outcome of interest; was information about the exposure ascertained in the same way from <em>all</em> subjects; could knowledge of an individual's exposure status have influenced how the outcome was ascertained? Next, the results themselves need to be considered: what was the size and precision of the risk estimate; could there be other explanations, such as bias and confounding, for the results; were there other pointers, like a dose gradient, consistency with other studies or biological plausibility, which suggest a causal relationship? Finally, the clinical implications of the results need to be evaluated: are the findings applicable to today's clinical practice; who do they apply to; what are the numbers needed to harm? By addressing each of these points, clinicians can determine whether an apparently harmful effect is important and so decide whether they need to change their medical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":77031,"journal":{"name":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","volume":"10 4","pages":"Pages 647-660"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80010-1","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"8 Prognosis and harm\",\"authors\":\"Philip C. Hannaford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80010-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Obstetricians and gynaecologists often have to assess whether an exposure is causing a harmful effect. The first part of this assessment involves considering how the results were obtained: can the type of study determine a cause-and-effect relationship; were <em>all</em> subjects at similar risk of being exposed to the putative harmful exposure and of developing the outcome of interest; was information about the exposure ascertained in the same way from <em>all</em> subjects; could knowledge of an individual's exposure status have influenced how the outcome was ascertained? Next, the results themselves need to be considered: what was the size and precision of the risk estimate; could there be other explanations, such as bias and confounding, for the results; were there other pointers, like a dose gradient, consistency with other studies or biological plausibility, which suggest a causal relationship? Finally, the clinical implications of the results need to be evaluated: are the findings applicable to today's clinical practice; who do they apply to; what are the numbers needed to harm? By addressing each of these points, clinicians can determine whether an apparently harmful effect is important and so decide whether they need to change their medical practice.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 647-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0950-3552(96)80010-1\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bailliere's clinical obstetrics and gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950355296800101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

产科医生和妇科医生经常需要评估暴露是否会造成有害影响。评估的第一部分涉及考虑如何获得结果:研究类型是否可以确定因果关系;是否所有的受试者都有相似的风险暴露于假定的有害暴露和产生感兴趣的结果;所有研究对象的暴露信息是否以相同的方式确定?对个体暴露状态的了解是否会影响结果的确定?接下来,需要考虑结果本身:风险估计的大小和精度是什么;是否有其他的解释,如偏差和混淆,对结果;是否有其他指标,如剂量梯度、与其他研究的一致性或生物学上的合理性,表明两者之间存在因果关系?最后,需要评估结果的临床意义:这些发现是否适用于今天的临床实践;他们向谁申请?伤害需要多少数字?通过解决这些问题,临床医生可以确定一个明显有害的影响是否重要,从而决定他们是否需要改变他们的医疗实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
8 Prognosis and harm

Obstetricians and gynaecologists often have to assess whether an exposure is causing a harmful effect. The first part of this assessment involves considering how the results were obtained: can the type of study determine a cause-and-effect relationship; were all subjects at similar risk of being exposed to the putative harmful exposure and of developing the outcome of interest; was information about the exposure ascertained in the same way from all subjects; could knowledge of an individual's exposure status have influenced how the outcome was ascertained? Next, the results themselves need to be considered: what was the size and precision of the risk estimate; could there be other explanations, such as bias and confounding, for the results; were there other pointers, like a dose gradient, consistency with other studies or biological plausibility, which suggest a causal relationship? Finally, the clinical implications of the results need to be evaluated: are the findings applicable to today's clinical practice; who do they apply to; what are the numbers needed to harm? By addressing each of these points, clinicians can determine whether an apparently harmful effect is important and so decide whether they need to change their medical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prolapse. Vaginal hysterectomy. Contributors to this issue Preface 3 Adverse effects of luteinizing hormone on fertility: fact or fantasy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1