女性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗延误[j]

A. Dosaj, Q. Class, Jessica L George
{"title":"女性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗延误[j]","authors":"A. Dosaj, Q. Class, Jessica L George","doi":"10.1097/01.AOG.0000929952.19687.4f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Sex disparities in a perioperative emergency warrant investigation to improve equitable patient care. We investigated whether differences exist in care of appendicitis across patient sex. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with appendicitis between 2011 and 2020 at an inner-city academic hospital. We collected demographic data and time records of key milestones in clinic care. We used chi-square, paired t test, ANOVA, and Cox proportional hazard analyses to examine differences between sex and other factors. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients were included, 182 (47.3%) females and 203 (52.7%) males. Patients were similar across sex, age, race, reason for visit, and number of emergency room visits. The time to admission for females was longer as compared to males (t(304)=–2.82, P<.05). Cox proportional hazard analysis predicting time to admission based on sex while controlling for age and race showed that females have a longer time to admission (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.58–0.92]), youngest patients (<15 years) were admitted faster than older-aged patients (HR 2.13 [95% CI 1.45–3.13]), and as compared with Black patients, White patients were admitted faster (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.06–2.29]). CONCLUSION: Reproductive-aged females had significantly longer times to admission than male peers with the same indication, and White patients were admitted more expeditiously than Black patients. There was a trend of slower surgical consult and admission for females with gynecological disorders. This study suggests that sex biases exist within our system. This highlights that an active effort must be taken to rule out differentials that are not sex based.","PeriodicalId":19405,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]\",\"authors\":\"A. Dosaj, Q. Class, Jessica L George\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.AOG.0000929952.19687.4f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION: Sex disparities in a perioperative emergency warrant investigation to improve equitable patient care. We investigated whether differences exist in care of appendicitis across patient sex. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with appendicitis between 2011 and 2020 at an inner-city academic hospital. We collected demographic data and time records of key milestones in clinic care. We used chi-square, paired t test, ANOVA, and Cox proportional hazard analyses to examine differences between sex and other factors. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients were included, 182 (47.3%) females and 203 (52.7%) males. Patients were similar across sex, age, race, reason for visit, and number of emergency room visits. The time to admission for females was longer as compared to males (t(304)=–2.82, P<.05). Cox proportional hazard analysis predicting time to admission based on sex while controlling for age and race showed that females have a longer time to admission (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.58–0.92]), youngest patients (<15 years) were admitted faster than older-aged patients (HR 2.13 [95% CI 1.45–3.13]), and as compared with Black patients, White patients were admitted faster (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.06–2.29]). CONCLUSION: Reproductive-aged females had significantly longer times to admission than male peers with the same indication, and White patients were admitted more expeditiously than Black patients. There was a trend of slower surgical consult and admission for females with gynecological disorders. This study suggests that sex biases exist within our system. This highlights that an active effort must be taken to rule out differentials that are not sex based.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000929952.19687.4f\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000929952.19687.4f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:围手术期急诊的性别差异需要调查,以改善公平的患者护理。我们调查了不同性别患者在阑尾炎护理方面是否存在差异。方法:我们对2011年至2020年在市中心一家学术医院的阑尾炎患者进行了回顾性队列研究。我们收集了临床护理中关键里程碑的人口统计数据和时间记录。我们使用卡方、配对t检验、方差分析和Cox比例风险分析来检验性别和其他因素之间的差异。结果:共纳入385例患者,其中女性182例(47.3%),男性203例(52.7%)。患者在性别、年龄、种族、就诊原因和急诊室就诊次数方面相似。女性住院时间较男性长(t(304)= -2.82, P< 0.05)。Cox比例风险分析基于性别预测入院时间,同时控制年龄和种族,结果显示女性入院时间更长(HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.58-0.92]),年龄最小(<15岁)的患者入院时间比年龄较大的患者快(HR 2.13 [95% CI 1.45-3.13]),与黑人患者相比,白人患者入院时间更快(HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.06-2.29])。结论:同指征的育龄女性患者入院时间明显长于同龄男性患者,白人患者入院时间明显快于黑人患者。女性妇科疾病的外科会诊和住院有缓慢的趋势。这项研究表明,性别偏见存在于我们的系统中。这突出表明,必须积极努力排除非基于性别的差别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
INTRODUCTION: Sex disparities in a perioperative emergency warrant investigation to improve equitable patient care. We investigated whether differences exist in care of appendicitis across patient sex. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with appendicitis between 2011 and 2020 at an inner-city academic hospital. We collected demographic data and time records of key milestones in clinic care. We used chi-square, paired t test, ANOVA, and Cox proportional hazard analyses to examine differences between sex and other factors. RESULTS: A total of 385 patients were included, 182 (47.3%) females and 203 (52.7%) males. Patients were similar across sex, age, race, reason for visit, and number of emergency room visits. The time to admission for females was longer as compared to males (t(304)=–2.82, P<.05). Cox proportional hazard analysis predicting time to admission based on sex while controlling for age and race showed that females have a longer time to admission (HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.58–0.92]), youngest patients (<15 years) were admitted faster than older-aged patients (HR 2.13 [95% CI 1.45–3.13]), and as compared with Black patients, White patients were admitted faster (HR 1.56 [95% CI 1.06–2.29]). CONCLUSION: Reproductive-aged females had significantly longer times to admission than male peers with the same indication, and White patients were admitted more expeditiously than Black patients. There was a trend of slower surgical consult and admission for females with gynecological disorders. This study suggests that sex biases exist within our system. This highlights that an active effort must be taken to rule out differentials that are not sex based.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Author Agreement. A Prospective Study to Assess for Histologic Changes on Vulvar Biopsies in Postmenopausal Women With Lichen Sclerosus Treated With Fractionated CO2 Laser Therapy [ID: 1339895] Prescribing Patterns for Postpartum Contraception Among Breastfeeding Patients Insured Under Medicaid [ID: 1375071] Evaluation of Perioperative Factors Contributing to Organ Space Surgical Site Infection After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy [ID: 1374862] Delays in Diagnosis and Treatment of Appendicitis in Females [ID: 1375790]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1