撒哈拉以南非洲计划生育干预措施的作用:范围审查

Teklemariam Yarinbab, S. Getachew, S. Kassa, Walelign Atomsa, M. Setegn
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲计划生育干预措施的作用:范围审查","authors":"Teklemariam Yarinbab, S. Getachew, S. Kassa, Walelign Atomsa, M. Setegn","doi":"10.35248/2167-0420.19.8.471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This scoping review was aimed to map the available evidence on family planning intervention in Sub Saharan Africa. Even though there were systematic reviews conducted in this setting on family planning interventions, the need for this scoping review stems from the need to provide an updates on family planning intervention across Sub Saharan Africa. It is essential to establish an adequate evidence base to support the design of policies aimed at improving family planning interventions. Furthermore, condensing evidence across different settings allows a meaningful comparison of experiences and facilitates knowledge transfer across countries. Therefore, this scoping review tried to summarize what works in family planning interventions in Sub Saharan Africa. Methods: The overall focus was to review the overall body of evidence on a given topic, with focus on width rather than depth. We conducted our scoping review according to the ‘York Methodology’ described by Arksey & O’Malley. This allowed us to appraise and condense evidence across study types into one single interpretation. Result: Five studies were reviewed in this study. All of the studies were specific to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Among the five quantitative studies, the majority used cross-sectional study design while the remaining used quasiexperimental study design. From studies reviewed, demand creation through (mass media, community mobilizations), messages from religious leaders, advocacy, social franchising, establishment of family planning task force, mobile outreach, and static service delivery were mentioned as means of family planning interventions. Conclusion: Mass media coverage, demand generation, and advocacy and community mobilization were commonly used in family planning interventions across different Sub-Saharan African Countries. Accordingly, family planning interventions which used different these strategies were characterized by better use of modern contraception in these setups.","PeriodicalId":93471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health care and management","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Works in Family Planning Interventions in Sub-saharan Africa: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Teklemariam Yarinbab, S. Getachew, S. Kassa, Walelign Atomsa, M. Setegn\",\"doi\":\"10.35248/2167-0420.19.8.471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This scoping review was aimed to map the available evidence on family planning intervention in Sub Saharan Africa. Even though there were systematic reviews conducted in this setting on family planning interventions, the need for this scoping review stems from the need to provide an updates on family planning intervention across Sub Saharan Africa. It is essential to establish an adequate evidence base to support the design of policies aimed at improving family planning interventions. Furthermore, condensing evidence across different settings allows a meaningful comparison of experiences and facilitates knowledge transfer across countries. Therefore, this scoping review tried to summarize what works in family planning interventions in Sub Saharan Africa. Methods: The overall focus was to review the overall body of evidence on a given topic, with focus on width rather than depth. We conducted our scoping review according to the ‘York Methodology’ described by Arksey & O’Malley. This allowed us to appraise and condense evidence across study types into one single interpretation. Result: Five studies were reviewed in this study. All of the studies were specific to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Among the five quantitative studies, the majority used cross-sectional study design while the remaining used quasiexperimental study design. From studies reviewed, demand creation through (mass media, community mobilizations), messages from religious leaders, advocacy, social franchising, establishment of family planning task force, mobile outreach, and static service delivery were mentioned as means of family planning interventions. Conclusion: Mass media coverage, demand generation, and advocacy and community mobilization were commonly used in family planning interventions across different Sub-Saharan African Countries. Accordingly, family planning interventions which used different these strategies were characterized by better use of modern contraception in these setups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health care and management\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health care and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.19.8.471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health care and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2167-0420.19.8.471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

引言:这项范围审查的目的是绘制撒哈拉以南非洲计划生育干预的现有证据。尽管在这种情况下对计划生育干预措施进行了系统审查,但需要进行范围审查,因为需要提供撒哈拉以南非洲地区计划生育干预措施的最新情况。必须建立一个充分的证据基础,以支持设计旨在改进计划生育干预措施的政策。此外,在不同背景下压缩证据可以对经验进行有意义的比较,并促进各国之间的知识转移。因此,本范围审查试图总结在撒哈拉以南非洲计划生育干预措施中起作用的方法。方法:总体重点是对给定主题的整体证据进行审查,重点是宽度而不是深度。我们根据Arksey & O ' malley所描述的“约克方法论”进行了范围审查。这使我们能够评估并将不同研究类型的证据浓缩为一个单一的解释。结果:本研究回顾了5项研究。所有这些研究都是针对撒哈拉以南非洲国家的。五项定量研究中,大部分采用横断面研究设计,其余采用准实验研究设计。从所审查的研究来看,通过(大众传播媒介、社区动员)创造需求、宗教领袖的信息、宣传、社会特许经营、建立计划生育工作队、流动外联和静态服务提供被认为是计划生育干预手段。结论:大众媒体报道、需求产生、宣传和社区动员是撒哈拉以南非洲不同国家计划生育干预措施的常用手段。因此,采用不同策略的计划生育干预措施的特点是在这些机构中更好地使用现代避孕方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What Works in Family Planning Interventions in Sub-saharan Africa: A Scoping Review
Introduction: This scoping review was aimed to map the available evidence on family planning intervention in Sub Saharan Africa. Even though there were systematic reviews conducted in this setting on family planning interventions, the need for this scoping review stems from the need to provide an updates on family planning intervention across Sub Saharan Africa. It is essential to establish an adequate evidence base to support the design of policies aimed at improving family planning interventions. Furthermore, condensing evidence across different settings allows a meaningful comparison of experiences and facilitates knowledge transfer across countries. Therefore, this scoping review tried to summarize what works in family planning interventions in Sub Saharan Africa. Methods: The overall focus was to review the overall body of evidence on a given topic, with focus on width rather than depth. We conducted our scoping review according to the ‘York Methodology’ described by Arksey & O’Malley. This allowed us to appraise and condense evidence across study types into one single interpretation. Result: Five studies were reviewed in this study. All of the studies were specific to countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. Among the five quantitative studies, the majority used cross-sectional study design while the remaining used quasiexperimental study design. From studies reviewed, demand creation through (mass media, community mobilizations), messages from religious leaders, advocacy, social franchising, establishment of family planning task force, mobile outreach, and static service delivery were mentioned as means of family planning interventions. Conclusion: Mass media coverage, demand generation, and advocacy and community mobilization were commonly used in family planning interventions across different Sub-Saharan African Countries. Accordingly, family planning interventions which used different these strategies were characterized by better use of modern contraception in these setups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exclusive breastfeeding practice and its associated factors among mothers with infants aged less than six months in Nono, Western Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study The Intricate Interactions between Maternal Smoking and Drinking During Pregnancy and Birthweight Z-Scores of Preterm Births. Utilization of Long Acting and Permanent Contraceptive Methods and Associated Factors among Married Women of Reproductive Age Group in Goba Town, Southeast Ethiopia Trend Analysis of Malaria Prevalence in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, Western Ethiopia, 2020: A Retrospective Study Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Infection Prevention among Health Care Workers in Public Health Facilities in West Guji Zone, Oromia,Ethiopia, 2018
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1