出版趋势与会计出版机构网络:《会计评论》1926-2014年数据

IF 0.8 Q4 BUSINESS Accounting History Review Pub Date : 2017-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049
Christian Lohmann, Marc Eulerich
{"title":"出版趋势与会计出版机构网络:《会计评论》1926-2014年数据","authors":"Christian Lohmann, Marc Eulerich","doi":"10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Our study charts the development of the accounting community by tracing publication trends and changes in methodology, including a major shift towards positive and neoclassical economics, multi-authorship and the prevalence of particular institutions, as reflected in The Accounting Review (TAR) between 1926 and 2014. Using network analysis, we identify distinct networks in this community and show that while the network of the institutions to which TAR authors were affiliated in the analysed period became diverse, the network of the institutions from which TAR authors received their doctorate remained dominated by a relatively small group of élite US universities.","PeriodicalId":43233,"journal":{"name":"Accounting History Review","volume":"57 1","pages":"1 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Publication trends and the network of publishing institutions in accounting: data on The Accounting Review, 1926–2014\",\"authors\":\"Christian Lohmann, Marc Eulerich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Our study charts the development of the accounting community by tracing publication trends and changes in methodology, including a major shift towards positive and neoclassical economics, multi-authorship and the prevalence of particular institutions, as reflected in The Accounting Review (TAR) between 1926 and 2014. Using network analysis, we identify distinct networks in this community and show that while the network of the institutions to which TAR authors were affiliated in the analysed period became diverse, the network of the institutions from which TAR authors received their doctorate remained dominated by a relatively small group of élite US universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting History Review\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting History Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21552851.2016.1192049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

我们的研究通过追踪出版趋势和方法变化来描绘会计界的发展,包括向积极经济学和新古典经济学的重大转变,多作者和特定机构的流行,如1926年至2014年会计评论(TAR)所反映的那样。通过网络分析,我们确定了这个群体中不同的网络,并表明,尽管在分析期间,西藏自治区作者所属的机构网络变得多样化,但西藏自治区作者获得博士学位的机构网络仍然由相对较少的美国大学主导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Publication trends and the network of publishing institutions in accounting: data on The Accounting Review, 1926–2014
ABSTRACT Our study charts the development of the accounting community by tracing publication trends and changes in methodology, including a major shift towards positive and neoclassical economics, multi-authorship and the prevalence of particular institutions, as reflected in The Accounting Review (TAR) between 1926 and 2014. Using network analysis, we identify distinct networks in this community and show that while the network of the institutions to which TAR authors were affiliated in the analysed period became diverse, the network of the institutions from which TAR authors received their doctorate remained dominated by a relatively small group of élite US universities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Accounting for sustainability in water supply: the case of the ‘Bottini Aqueduct’ in medieval times ‘American Bookkeeping’ in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries which was not American ‘Accounting for the Music’. Institutional logics in the Regio Teatro Carolino of Palermo at the beginning of the nineteenth century Reflections from the Editor’s Desk Measuring profit and performance, a cautionary tale: Birmingham Small Arms c.1911–c.1936
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1