在多个项目中实施以能力为基础的教育:利用ADDIE组织和监控项目优先级的研讨会

Alexandre Lafleur, Marie-Julie Babin, Claudie Michaud-Couture, Miriam Lacasse, Yves Giguère, Adrien Cantat, Christyne Allen, Nathalie Gingras
{"title":"在多个项目中实施以能力为基础的教育:利用ADDIE组织和监控项目优先级的研讨会","authors":"Alexandre Lafleur,&nbsp;Marie-Julie Babin,&nbsp;Claudie Michaud-Couture,&nbsp;Miriam Lacasse,&nbsp;Yves Giguère,&nbsp;Adrien Cantat,&nbsp;Christyne Allen,&nbsp;Nathalie Gingras","doi":"10.1002/cbe2.1257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Context</h3>\n \n <p>All Canadian postgraduate medical programs are implementing the major components of competency-based education. To do so, our institution had to provide individualized training and monitoring for all our programs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Innovation</h3>\n \n <p>We organized half-day workshops with four work sessions: core competencies, competency portfolio, curriculum mapping, and competence committee. Program teams decided their priority tasks after each work session. We classified tasks into ADDIE pedagogical design stages (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). We conducted interviews at 12 months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Programs (<i>n</i> = 29) prioritized mainly tasks of Design (37% of tasks), Development (24%) and Analysis (21%). At 12-month follow-up (<i>n</i> = 17), 20% of the tasks were initiated, 22% reached a higher stage, 33% reaching Implementation/Evaluation. Programs needed material and financial resources for Analysis/Development tasks, and faculty training for Implementation/Evaluation tasks.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Work sessions provided a structure to commit to priority tasks. Their classification into ADDIE stages systematized the monitoring and the search for solutions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101234,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1257","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing competency-based education in multiple programs: A workshop to structure and monitor programs' priorities using ADDIE\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Lafleur,&nbsp;Marie-Julie Babin,&nbsp;Claudie Michaud-Couture,&nbsp;Miriam Lacasse,&nbsp;Yves Giguère,&nbsp;Adrien Cantat,&nbsp;Christyne Allen,&nbsp;Nathalie Gingras\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cbe2.1257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Context</h3>\\n \\n <p>All Canadian postgraduate medical programs are implementing the major components of competency-based education. To do so, our institution had to provide individualized training and monitoring for all our programs.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Innovation</h3>\\n \\n <p>We organized half-day workshops with four work sessions: core competencies, competency portfolio, curriculum mapping, and competence committee. Program teams decided their priority tasks after each work session. We classified tasks into ADDIE pedagogical design stages (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). We conducted interviews at 12 months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Programs (<i>n</i> = 29) prioritized mainly tasks of Design (37% of tasks), Development (24%) and Analysis (21%). At 12-month follow-up (<i>n</i> = 17), 20% of the tasks were initiated, 22% reached a higher stage, 33% reaching Implementation/Evaluation. Programs needed material and financial resources for Analysis/Development tasks, and faculty training for Implementation/Evaluation tasks.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Work sessions provided a structure to commit to priority tasks. Their classification into ADDIE stages systematized the monitoring and the search for solutions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/cbe2.1257\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Competency-Based Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Competency-Based Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbe2.1257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

所有加拿大研究生医学课程都在实施能力教育的主要组成部分。为了做到这一点,我们的机构必须为我们所有的项目提供个性化的培训和监控。我们组织了为期半天的研讨会,分为四个部分:核心能力、能力组合、课程映射和能力委员会。项目团队在每个工作会议之后决定他们的优先任务。我们将任务划分为ADDIE教学设计阶段(分析、设计、开发、实施、评估)。我们在12个月时进行了采访。结果29个项目的优先级主要为设计(37%)、开发(24%)和分析(21%)。在12个月的随访中(n = 17), 20%的任务被启动,22%达到更高阶段,33%达到实施/评估。项目需要用于分析/开发任务的材料和财政资源,以及用于实施/评估任务的教员培训。工作会议提供了一种致力于优先任务的结构。它们分为ADDIE阶段,使监测和寻找解决方案系统化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementing competency-based education in multiple programs: A workshop to structure and monitor programs' priorities using ADDIE

Context

All Canadian postgraduate medical programs are implementing the major components of competency-based education. To do so, our institution had to provide individualized training and monitoring for all our programs.

Innovation

We organized half-day workshops with four work sessions: core competencies, competency portfolio, curriculum mapping, and competence committee. Program teams decided their priority tasks after each work session. We classified tasks into ADDIE pedagogical design stages (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). We conducted interviews at 12 months.

Results

Programs (n = 29) prioritized mainly tasks of Design (37% of tasks), Development (24%) and Analysis (21%). At 12-month follow-up (n = 17), 20% of the tasks were initiated, 22% reached a higher stage, 33% reaching Implementation/Evaluation. Programs needed material and financial resources for Analysis/Development tasks, and faculty training for Implementation/Evaluation tasks.

Conclusion

Work sessions provided a structure to commit to priority tasks. Their classification into ADDIE stages systematized the monitoring and the search for solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Exploring secondary teachers' perspectives on implementing competency-based education The impact of student recognition of excellence to student outcome in a competency-based educational model Issue Information JCBE editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1