外部治理机制对多哥小额信贷机构绩效的影响

Akouvi Gadedjisso-Tossou, T. Kouevi, Jean-Pierre Gueyié
{"title":"外部治理机制对多哥小额信贷机构绩效的影响","authors":"Akouvi Gadedjisso-Tossou, T. Kouevi, Jean-Pierre Gueyié","doi":"10.1108/cg-03-2022-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to assess the effects of external governance mechanisms on the performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Togo.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nUsing annual time series data from a sample of 30 MFIs during the period 2011–2015, the authors apply panel data econometrics in their estimations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results indicate that the notation by a rating agency positively and significantly affects the financial return of MFIs. The quality and the regularity of the audits negatively and significantly influence the financial performance (measured by return on assets and operating self-sufficiency) but favorably and significantly influence social performance (increased number of active borrowers (NAB) and reduced size of loans). Furthermore, supervision increases the amount of individual loans but decreases the NAB, which means deterioration in social performance. Overall, this paper shows that external governance mechanisms significantly affect the performance of Togolese MFIs, but with varying effects depending on the mechanism considered.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe sample size of 30 MFIs is small, and the geographic coverage of the study is restricted to MFIs operating in the city of Lomé, Togo. The authors did not have access to the information regarding the portfolio at risk at 30 days, even though it is a measure of financial performance. Likewise, we did not have access to the appendices to the financial statements for the calculation of prudential ratios. This method, which consists of asking the institutions using a questionnaire if they comply with prudential standards, may be biased because this study cannot verify the authenticity of the responses given that the standards are quantitative.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study findings advocate that improving the financial and social performance of MFIs requires improving the quality of external governance mechanisms. MFIs should then pay close attention to well-functioning external governance mechanisms.\n\n\nSocial implications\nAs MFIs are key social actors in a society, all mechanisms that contribute to their efficiency benefit society.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study contributes to the corporate governance literature by showing that external governance mechanisms influence performance. These external mechanisms are complementary disciplinary measures to internal governance mechanisms and other tools.\n","PeriodicalId":47880,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of external governance mechanisms on the performance of microfinance institutions in Togo\",\"authors\":\"Akouvi Gadedjisso-Tossou, T. Kouevi, Jean-Pierre Gueyié\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/cg-03-2022-0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to assess the effects of external governance mechanisms on the performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Togo.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nUsing annual time series data from a sample of 30 MFIs during the period 2011–2015, the authors apply panel data econometrics in their estimations.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results indicate that the notation by a rating agency positively and significantly affects the financial return of MFIs. The quality and the regularity of the audits negatively and significantly influence the financial performance (measured by return on assets and operating self-sufficiency) but favorably and significantly influence social performance (increased number of active borrowers (NAB) and reduced size of loans). Furthermore, supervision increases the amount of individual loans but decreases the NAB, which means deterioration in social performance. Overall, this paper shows that external governance mechanisms significantly affect the performance of Togolese MFIs, but with varying effects depending on the mechanism considered.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe sample size of 30 MFIs is small, and the geographic coverage of the study is restricted to MFIs operating in the city of Lomé, Togo. The authors did not have access to the information regarding the portfolio at risk at 30 days, even though it is a measure of financial performance. Likewise, we did not have access to the appendices to the financial statements for the calculation of prudential ratios. This method, which consists of asking the institutions using a questionnaire if they comply with prudential standards, may be biased because this study cannot verify the authenticity of the responses given that the standards are quantitative.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study findings advocate that improving the financial and social performance of MFIs requires improving the quality of external governance mechanisms. MFIs should then pay close attention to well-functioning external governance mechanisms.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nAs MFIs are key social actors in a society, all mechanisms that contribute to their efficiency benefit society.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study contributes to the corporate governance literature by showing that external governance mechanisms influence performance. These external mechanisms are complementary disciplinary measures to internal governance mechanisms and other tools.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2022-0136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business in Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2022-0136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在评估外部治理机制对多哥小额信贷机构(mfi)绩效的影响。设计/方法/方法使用2011-2015年期间30家小额信贷机构样本的年度时间序列数据,作者在他们的估计中应用面板数据计量经济学。结果表明,评级机构对小额信贷机构的财务回报有显著的正向影响。审计的质量和规律性对财务绩效(以资产回报率和经营自给自足来衡量)产生负面和显著影响,但对社会绩效产生有利和显著影响(增加活跃借款人(NAB)数量和减少贷款规模)。此外,监管增加了个人贷款的数量,但降低了NAB,这意味着社会绩效的恶化。总体而言,本文表明外部治理机制显著影响多哥小额信贷机构的绩效,但根据所考虑的机制,其效果有所不同。研究的局限性/意义30家小额信贷机构的样本量很小,研究的地理覆盖范围仅限于在多哥lomoise市经营的小额信贷机构。作者在30天内无法获得有关风险投资组合的信息,尽管这是衡量财务业绩的指标。同样,我们也没有办法获得财务报表的附录来计算审慎比率。这种方法包括使用问卷询问机构是否遵守审慎标准,可能会有偏差,因为考虑到标准是定量的,本研究无法验证回答的真实性。实践启示研究结果表明,提高小额信贷机构的财务和社会绩效需要提高外部治理机制的质量。小额信贷机构应密切注意运作良好的外部治理机制。由于小额信贷机构是社会中的关键社会行动者,所有有助于其效率的机制都有利于社会。原创性/价值本研究通过表明外部治理机制影响绩效,为公司治理文献做出了贡献。这些外部机制是对内部治理机制和其他工具的补充惩戒措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The influence of external governance mechanisms on the performance of microfinance institutions in Togo
Purpose This paper aims to assess the effects of external governance mechanisms on the performance of microfinance institutions (MFIs) in Togo. Design/methodology/approach Using annual time series data from a sample of 30 MFIs during the period 2011–2015, the authors apply panel data econometrics in their estimations. Findings The results indicate that the notation by a rating agency positively and significantly affects the financial return of MFIs. The quality and the regularity of the audits negatively and significantly influence the financial performance (measured by return on assets and operating self-sufficiency) but favorably and significantly influence social performance (increased number of active borrowers (NAB) and reduced size of loans). Furthermore, supervision increases the amount of individual loans but decreases the NAB, which means deterioration in social performance. Overall, this paper shows that external governance mechanisms significantly affect the performance of Togolese MFIs, but with varying effects depending on the mechanism considered. Research limitations/implications The sample size of 30 MFIs is small, and the geographic coverage of the study is restricted to MFIs operating in the city of Lomé, Togo. The authors did not have access to the information regarding the portfolio at risk at 30 days, even though it is a measure of financial performance. Likewise, we did not have access to the appendices to the financial statements for the calculation of prudential ratios. This method, which consists of asking the institutions using a questionnaire if they comply with prudential standards, may be biased because this study cannot verify the authenticity of the responses given that the standards are quantitative. Practical implications The study findings advocate that improving the financial and social performance of MFIs requires improving the quality of external governance mechanisms. MFIs should then pay close attention to well-functioning external governance mechanisms. Social implications As MFIs are key social actors in a society, all mechanisms that contribute to their efficiency benefit society. Originality/value This study contributes to the corporate governance literature by showing that external governance mechanisms influence performance. These external mechanisms are complementary disciplinary measures to internal governance mechanisms and other tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
33.90%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Providing a consistent source of in-depth information, analysis and advice considering corporate governance on an international scale, Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society focuses on knowledge development, practice and performance standards for scholars and Boards of Directors/ Governors of companies throughout the world. The journal publishes a diverse range of substantive theoretical and methodological debates as well as practical developments in the field of corporate governance worldwide. The journal particularly encourages attention to the impact of changes of business/corporate governance forms and practices on people, and the sustainability of different governance models. Articles that highlight models and structures that advance the interests, dignity and well being of all stakeholders, in a sustainable manner, are particularly welcome. The journal covers a broad spectrum of governance-related themes including: -Effective boardroom performance -Control and regulation -Executive leadership -The role and contribution of external (non-executive) directors -The growing importance of governance in the wake of ever-greater corporate scandals -Redefinitions and reassessments of corporate governance models -The role of business in society -The changing nature of the relationship and responsibilities of the firm towards various stakeholders -The incentives required to encourage more socially- and environmentally-responsible corporate action -The role and impact of local and international regulatory agencies and regimes on corporate behaviour.
期刊最新文献
Female leadership and ESG performance of firms: Nordic evidence Making the invisible visible: stakeholder capitalism and powerless stakeholders Corporate board, audit committee and earnings manipulation: does the corporate regulation matter? An emerging economy perspective The evolutionary journey of the American corporation and its governance over two centuries Sustainability reporting, board diversity, earnings management and financial statements readability: evidence from an emerging economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1