哮喘主题的家庭学习

Joyce A Baker, Spencer Weir, M. Gleason, Naomi Miyazawa, S. Szefler
{"title":"哮喘主题的家庭学习","authors":"Joyce A Baker, Spencer Weir, M. Gleason, Naomi Miyazawa, S. Szefler","doi":"10.31525/ct1-nct03894982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Utilizing group education promotes problem solving, stimulates conversation, and provides shame free environments to decrease stigmas. Providing comprehensive education by an experienced certified asthma educator (AE-C) is an important step in supporting patients diagnosed with asthma. Methods: Patients 2 to 17 years of age who were prescribed ≥2 systemic steroid courses, had ≥ 2 emergency department visits, and/or ≥1 hospitalization for asthma exacerbation the preceding 12 months were identified having poorly controlled asthma. These patients and their legal guardian/caregiver were recruited from pulmonary clinic or inpatient services to participate in classroom asthma education provided by a AE-C to address real life problem-solving and promote self-awareness regarding medication use. Post card consent was obtained for the patient and legal guardian to attend 1-2 classes over a four-month period; complete a pre/post asthma knowledge assessment; and receive text/phone call reminders prior to each class. The classroom education materials included audio and visual learning tools written at a fifth-grade reading level in both English and Spanish. Results: Our goal was to recruit 50-75 patients over a 9-month period. Only eight patients were recruited for the study, four of them with their caregivers participated in the classroom education. Patients and caregivers who attended the class coincided with a clinic visit. Two of the four families completed the pre and post asthma knowledge survey. Revisit/readmissions were reviewed as a part of our outcome measures. None of the patients who participated in the classroom education had a revisit/readmission for asthma within 90 days and 100% of them attended their pulmonary clinic visit. One of the four patients who did not attend the classroom education had a revisit within 90 days and none of them have a scheduled specialist visit since enrolling. Conclusions: Due to the low enrollment and completion of the program we were not able to effectively evaluate the program. Caregivers felt the classroom education was well worth their time. Many families are not willing to participate in any educational sessions outside of scheduled clinic visits. Obtaining pre or post survey results was found to be successful only when provided in person rather than via phone call, email, or text. We believe convenience played a significant role in patient and caregivers’ engagement and participation.","PeriodicalId":9602,"journal":{"name":"Case Medical Research","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Learning on Asthma Topics\",\"authors\":\"Joyce A Baker, Spencer Weir, M. Gleason, Naomi Miyazawa, S. Szefler\",\"doi\":\"10.31525/ct1-nct03894982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Utilizing group education promotes problem solving, stimulates conversation, and provides shame free environments to decrease stigmas. Providing comprehensive education by an experienced certified asthma educator (AE-C) is an important step in supporting patients diagnosed with asthma. Methods: Patients 2 to 17 years of age who were prescribed ≥2 systemic steroid courses, had ≥ 2 emergency department visits, and/or ≥1 hospitalization for asthma exacerbation the preceding 12 months were identified having poorly controlled asthma. These patients and their legal guardian/caregiver were recruited from pulmonary clinic or inpatient services to participate in classroom asthma education provided by a AE-C to address real life problem-solving and promote self-awareness regarding medication use. Post card consent was obtained for the patient and legal guardian to attend 1-2 classes over a four-month period; complete a pre/post asthma knowledge assessment; and receive text/phone call reminders prior to each class. The classroom education materials included audio and visual learning tools written at a fifth-grade reading level in both English and Spanish. Results: Our goal was to recruit 50-75 patients over a 9-month period. Only eight patients were recruited for the study, four of them with their caregivers participated in the classroom education. Patients and caregivers who attended the class coincided with a clinic visit. Two of the four families completed the pre and post asthma knowledge survey. Revisit/readmissions were reviewed as a part of our outcome measures. None of the patients who participated in the classroom education had a revisit/readmission for asthma within 90 days and 100% of them attended their pulmonary clinic visit. One of the four patients who did not attend the classroom education had a revisit within 90 days and none of them have a scheduled specialist visit since enrolling. Conclusions: Due to the low enrollment and completion of the program we were not able to effectively evaluate the program. Caregivers felt the classroom education was well worth their time. Many families are not willing to participate in any educational sessions outside of scheduled clinic visits. Obtaining pre or post survey results was found to be successful only when provided in person rather than via phone call, email, or text. We believe convenience played a significant role in patient and caregivers’ engagement and participation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Case Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Case Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31525/ct1-nct03894982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31525/ct1-nct03894982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:利用团体教育促进问题解决,刺激对话,并提供无羞耻感的环境来减少耻辱感。由经验丰富的认证哮喘教育者(AE-C)提供全面的教育是支持被诊断患有哮喘的患者的重要一步。方法:2 ~ 17岁的患者,如果在过去12个月内接受了≥2个全身性类固醇治疗,急诊次数≥2次,和/或因哮喘加重住院次数≥1次,则确定为哮喘控制不良。这些患者及其法定监护人/照顾者从肺部门诊或住院服务部门招募,参加由AE-C提供的课堂哮喘教育,以解决现实生活中的问题,并提高对药物使用的自我意识。获得患者及其法定监护人在4个月期间参加1-2节课程的明信片同意;完成哮喘前后知识评估;并在每次上课前收到短信/电话提醒。课堂教学材料包括用英语和西班牙语编写的五年级阅读水平的视听学习工具。结果:我们的目标是在9个月的时间内招募50-75名患者。研究只招募了8名患者,其中4名患者和他们的护理人员一起参加了课堂教育。参加课程的患者和护理人员与诊所访问时间一致。4个家庭中有2个家庭完成了哮喘前后知识调查。重新审视/再入院作为我们结果测量的一部分。参加课堂教育的患者在90天内没有因哮喘再访或再入院,100%的患者参加了肺部门诊就诊。未参加课堂教育的4例患者中有1例在90天内进行了复查,自入组以来均未安排专科就诊。结论:由于该项目的低入组率和完成率,我们无法对该项目进行有效评估。看护人觉得课堂教育很值得他们花时间。许多家庭不愿意参加任何教育课程以外的预定诊所访问。调查前或调查后的调查结果只有亲自提供,而不是通过电话、电子邮件或短信获得。我们相信,便利性在患者和护理人员的参与和参与中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Family Learning on Asthma Topics
Background: Utilizing group education promotes problem solving, stimulates conversation, and provides shame free environments to decrease stigmas. Providing comprehensive education by an experienced certified asthma educator (AE-C) is an important step in supporting patients diagnosed with asthma. Methods: Patients 2 to 17 years of age who were prescribed ≥2 systemic steroid courses, had ≥ 2 emergency department visits, and/or ≥1 hospitalization for asthma exacerbation the preceding 12 months were identified having poorly controlled asthma. These patients and their legal guardian/caregiver were recruited from pulmonary clinic or inpatient services to participate in classroom asthma education provided by a AE-C to address real life problem-solving and promote self-awareness regarding medication use. Post card consent was obtained for the patient and legal guardian to attend 1-2 classes over a four-month period; complete a pre/post asthma knowledge assessment; and receive text/phone call reminders prior to each class. The classroom education materials included audio and visual learning tools written at a fifth-grade reading level in both English and Spanish. Results: Our goal was to recruit 50-75 patients over a 9-month period. Only eight patients were recruited for the study, four of them with their caregivers participated in the classroom education. Patients and caregivers who attended the class coincided with a clinic visit. Two of the four families completed the pre and post asthma knowledge survey. Revisit/readmissions were reviewed as a part of our outcome measures. None of the patients who participated in the classroom education had a revisit/readmission for asthma within 90 days and 100% of them attended their pulmonary clinic visit. One of the four patients who did not attend the classroom education had a revisit within 90 days and none of them have a scheduled specialist visit since enrolling. Conclusions: Due to the low enrollment and completion of the program we were not able to effectively evaluate the program. Caregivers felt the classroom education was well worth their time. Many families are not willing to participate in any educational sessions outside of scheduled clinic visits. Obtaining pre or post survey results was found to be successful only when provided in person rather than via phone call, email, or text. We believe convenience played a significant role in patient and caregivers’ engagement and participation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Family Learning on Asthma Topics Increasing Naloxone Access for Persons Who Use Opioids Fast-Track Eligibility and Hospital Discharge for Outpatient Lumbar Discectomy Hysteroscopic vs. Cervical Injection for Sentinel Node Detection of Endometrial Cancer: a Multicenter Prospective Randomized Study rATG Versus rATG Combined With Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIG) Induction Immunosuppression in HLA Incompatible Transplantation (INHIBIT)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1