“健身运动管理者”资格界定与笔试、实考、口试改革方案

Chang-Sun Kim, Hong-Sun Song, H. Kwak, Yun-A Shin, Jinwook Chung, Eun-Ha Koh, Dong-Ho Park
{"title":"“健身运动管理者”资格界定与笔试、实考、口试改革方案","authors":"Chang-Sun Kim, Hong-Sun Song, H. Kwak, Yun-A Shin, Jinwook Chung, Eun-Ha Koh, Dong-Ho Park","doi":"10.24985/kjss.2023.34.1.177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the problems posed by the new “Health Exercise Managers” qualification system implemented in 2015 and suggest a reformation plan for the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test.METHODS Eleven experts working in the academia and the exercise prescription field were selected as research participants using purposive sampling method (professors=5, director of sport science division in national research and development institute=1, head of national/private organization that issue Health Exercise Managers certificates=2, and health exercise managers working at university hospitals =3). The results were collected, examined and classified following numerous discussions among the authors.RESULTS First, the qualification definition should be based on “course completion” in the short term and “department certification” in the long term. Second, the written test can be reformed by identifying the core courses related to health exercise management and merging similar or overlapped courses. Also, the grades should be calculated for each question based on the knowledge gained in related courses. Third, the practical–oral test questions should be publicly available in advance to help candidates better prepare and learn practical skills, rather than set the standards for elimination.CONCLUSIONS An overall reformation of the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test will solve the problems posed on the quality of the “health exercise managers” qualification system.","PeriodicalId":17892,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Qualification Definition and Written, Practical–Oral Test Reformation Plan for Qualitative improvement of “Health Exercise Managers”\",\"authors\":\"Chang-Sun Kim, Hong-Sun Song, H. Kwak, Yun-A Shin, Jinwook Chung, Eun-Ha Koh, Dong-Ho Park\",\"doi\":\"10.24985/kjss.2023.34.1.177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the problems posed by the new “Health Exercise Managers” qualification system implemented in 2015 and suggest a reformation plan for the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test.METHODS Eleven experts working in the academia and the exercise prescription field were selected as research participants using purposive sampling method (professors=5, director of sport science division in national research and development institute=1, head of national/private organization that issue Health Exercise Managers certificates=2, and health exercise managers working at university hospitals =3). The results were collected, examined and classified following numerous discussions among the authors.RESULTS First, the qualification definition should be based on “course completion” in the short term and “department certification” in the long term. Second, the written test can be reformed by identifying the core courses related to health exercise management and merging similar or overlapped courses. Also, the grades should be calculated for each question based on the knowledge gained in related courses. Third, the practical–oral test questions should be publicly available in advance to help candidates better prepare and learn practical skills, rather than set the standards for elimination.CONCLUSIONS An overall reformation of the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test will solve the problems posed on the quality of the “health exercise managers” qualification system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Science\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2023.34.1.177\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2023.34.1.177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨2015年实施的“健身运动管理者”新资格制度存在的问题,提出资格认定、笔试和实操口试的改革方案。方法采用目的抽样法,选取学术界和运动处方领域的专家11人作为研究对象,其中教授5人,国家研究开发机构运动科学部主任1人,颁发健康运动管理者证书的国家/民间机构负责人2人,大学医院健康运动管理者3人。在作者之间进行了多次讨论后,对结果进行了收集、检查和分类。结果一是短期应以“修完课程”为主,长期应以“院系认证”为主。第二,可以对笔试进行改革,确定健康运动管理相关的核心课程,合并相似或重叠的课程。并且,每道题的成绩都是根据相关课程的知识来计算的。第三,口语练习试题应该提前公开,帮助考生更好地准备和学习实用技能,而不是制定淘汰标准。结论全面改革资格认定、笔试和实考口试,将解决“健身运动管理者”资格体系质量存在的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Qualification Definition and Written, Practical–Oral Test Reformation Plan for Qualitative improvement of “Health Exercise Managers”
PURPOSE This study aims to investigate the problems posed by the new “Health Exercise Managers” qualification system implemented in 2015 and suggest a reformation plan for the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test.METHODS Eleven experts working in the academia and the exercise prescription field were selected as research participants using purposive sampling method (professors=5, director of sport science division in national research and development institute=1, head of national/private organization that issue Health Exercise Managers certificates=2, and health exercise managers working at university hospitals =3). The results were collected, examined and classified following numerous discussions among the authors.RESULTS First, the qualification definition should be based on “course completion” in the short term and “department certification” in the long term. Second, the written test can be reformed by identifying the core courses related to health exercise management and merging similar or overlapped courses. Also, the grades should be calculated for each question based on the knowledge gained in related courses. Third, the practical–oral test questions should be publicly available in advance to help candidates better prepare and learn practical skills, rather than set the standards for elimination.CONCLUSIONS An overall reformation of the qualification definition, written test, and practical–oral test will solve the problems posed on the quality of the “health exercise managers” qualification system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effects of 12 Weeks of Continuous Exercise and Accumulation of Short-Duration Exercise on Body Composition, Physical Fitness, and Lifestyle Disease indices in Overweight Men in their 30s Validation of Two-Minute Step Test and Development of VO2max Prediction Equation in Older Korean Adults Research Trends in Physical Education in Small Schools Comparative Analysis of Maximal Aerobic Capacity and Sprint-Related Physical Fitness in Keirin Cyclists Ugly or Pretty: The Effects of Aesthetics and Exercise Involvement on Consumers’ Evaluations of Healthy Functional Foods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1