Robert V. Vavala, Deana Namuth-Covert, Courtney Haines, Donald J. Lee, James W. King, Carol Speth
{"title":"三门本科理科课程中的社区:学生感知分析","authors":"Robert V. Vavala, Deana Namuth-Covert, Courtney Haines, Donald J. Lee, James W. King, Carol Speth","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (<i>n</i> = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (<i>n</i> = 74, M = 55.24), <i>t</i> (255) = 3.55, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, <i>t</i> (255) = 2.81, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, <i>t</i> (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, <i>t</i> (186) = 2.95, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception\",\"authors\":\"Robert V. Vavala, Deana Namuth-Covert, Courtney Haines, Donald J. Lee, James W. King, Carol Speth\",\"doi\":\"10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (<i>n</i> = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (<i>n</i> = 74, M = 55.24), <i>t</i> (255) = 3.55, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, <i>t</i> (255) = 2.81, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, <i>t</i> (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, <i>t</i> (186) = 2.95, <i>p</i> < 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
那些感觉自己是课堂社区的一部分的学生比那些感觉不到类似社区水平的学生获得更多的乐趣,在学业上更成功。本研究旨在确定在线课程的学生是否与面对面课程的学生感知到相同水平的社区,以及外部因素是否影响社区感知。课堂社区调查(CCS)对三个入门级科学课程的学生进行,每个课程都有面对面的部分和在线部分。CCS由20个问题组成,测量整体社区和两个子量表,连通性和学习。五种可能的回答被给予1到5分,总分为100分。通过人口统计问题来确定课外因素是否会影响社区得分。面对面组学生(n = 183, M = 58.10)的社区得分显著高于在线组学生(n = 74, M = 55.24), t (255) = 3.55, p <0.05. 面对面部分学生的连通性得分显著高于在线部分学生的得分,t (255) = 2.81, p <0.05. 不同课程交付方式的学习子量表得分差异无统计学意义,t (255) = -1.80, ns。在8个人口统计问题中,只有关于课程是否必修的问题对社区分数有显著影响,t (186) = 2.95, p <0.05. 这项研究的结果表明,面对面的学生明显比在线学生感知到更高水平的社区。不同教学方式的学生对学习的感知和课程成绩没有显著差异。
Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception
Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (n = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (n = 74, M = 55.24), t (255) = 3.55, p < 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, t (255) = 2.81, p < 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, t (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, t (186) = 2.95, p < 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.