三门本科理科课程中的社区:学生感知分析

Robert V. Vavala, Deana Namuth-Covert, Courtney Haines, Donald J. Lee, James W. King, Carol Speth
{"title":"三门本科理科课程中的社区:学生感知分析","authors":"Robert V. Vavala,&nbsp;Deana Namuth-Covert,&nbsp;Courtney Haines,&nbsp;Donald J. Lee,&nbsp;James W. King,&nbsp;Carol Speth","doi":"10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (<i>n</i> = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (<i>n</i> = 74, M = 55.24), <i>t</i> (255) = 3.55, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, <i>t</i> (255) = 2.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, <i>t</i> (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, <i>t</i> (186) = 2.95, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":100810,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","volume":"39 1","pages":"157-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception\",\"authors\":\"Robert V. Vavala,&nbsp;Deana Namuth-Covert,&nbsp;Courtney Haines,&nbsp;Donald J. Lee,&nbsp;James W. King,&nbsp;Carol Speth\",\"doi\":\"10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (<i>n</i> = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (<i>n</i> = 74, M = 55.24), <i>t</i> (255) = 3.55, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, <i>t</i> (255) = 2.81, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, <i>t</i> (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, <i>t</i> (186) = 2.95, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"157-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.4195/jnrlse.2009.0039u","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

那些感觉自己是课堂社区的一部分的学生比那些感觉不到类似社区水平的学生获得更多的乐趣,在学业上更成功。本研究旨在确定在线课程的学生是否与面对面课程的学生感知到相同水平的社区,以及外部因素是否影响社区感知。课堂社区调查(CCS)对三个入门级科学课程的学生进行,每个课程都有面对面的部分和在线部分。CCS由20个问题组成,测量整体社区和两个子量表,连通性和学习。五种可能的回答被给予1到5分,总分为100分。通过人口统计问题来确定课外因素是否会影响社区得分。面对面组学生(n = 183, M = 58.10)的社区得分显著高于在线组学生(n = 74, M = 55.24), t (255) = 3.55, p <0.05. 面对面部分学生的连通性得分显著高于在线部分学生的得分,t (255) = 2.81, p <0.05. 不同课程交付方式的学习子量表得分差异无统计学意义,t (255) = -1.80, ns。在8个人口统计问题中,只有关于课程是否必修的问题对社区分数有显著影响,t (186) = 2.95, p <0.05. 这项研究的结果表明,面对面的学生明显比在线学生感知到更高水平的社区。不同教学方式的学生对学习的感知和课程成绩没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Community in Three Undergraduate University Science Courses: An Analysis of Student Perception

Students who feel like part of a classroom community gain more enjoyment and are more academically successful than students who do not feel similar levels of community. This study intended to determine if students in online courses perceive the same level of community as students in face-to-face classes and if outside factors impacted community perceptions. The Classroom Community Survey (CCS) was administered to students in three introductory-level science classes, each with a face-to-face section and an online section. The CCS consists of 20 questions, measuring overall community and two subscales, connectedness and learning. Five possible responses were given scores of 1 through 5 for a total of 100 possible points. Demographic questions were asked to establish if out-of-class factors affected community scores. Students in face-to-face sections (n = 183, M = 58.10) had significantly higher community scores than online students (n = 74, M = 55.24), t (255) = 3.55, p < 0.05. Connectedness scores for students in face-to-face sections were significantly higher than scores for their online counterparts, t (255) = 2.81, p < 0.05. Scores for the learning subscale were not significantly different based on course delivery method, t (255) = –1.80, ns. Of the eight demographic questions, only the question regarding if the course was required had a significant impact on community scores, t (186) = 2.95, p < 0.05. Results of this study showed that face-to-face students perceived significantly higher levels of community than did online students. Perception of learning and course grades were not significantly different for students across delivery methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corn Rootworm: Small Insect, Big Impact Assessing Student Learning with Surveys and a Pre-Test/Post-Test in an Online Course Student Presentations of Case Studies to Illustrate Core Concepts in Soil Biogeochemistry Using Student Competition Field Trips to Increase Teaching and Learning Effectiveness JNRLSE Editorial Board Minutes for 2011
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1