{"title":"封锁期间的绘画:观察住宅景观的“不可量化,但可以推测的”维度","authors":"Nicole Porter","doi":"10.1080/18626033.2022.2156103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goethe used the term ‘delicate empiricism’ to describe a disciplined process of prolonged empathetic observation, grounded in direct experience, using imagination, inspiration and intuition to encounter phenomena.1 Observational drawing, as an epistemological tool, can facilitate this kind of encounter. As design and drawing practitioner Laurie Olin asserts, drawing enables us to carefully observe ‘unquantifiable, but speculatively knowable, things: the nature of various places, the quality of light at different times, the manner of other people (or ourselves) . . . We learn through seeing, thinking about what we see, studying, and recording it in various ways by drawing.’2 In recent years there has been ‘a modest resurgence of interest within academia in the methodological affordance of observational sketching’,3 mostly in social sciences, anthropological fieldwork, geography and design schools. While drawing is regarded as a means of generating and recording knowledge of place—its past, present and potential future state—artist Gemma Anderson laments that ‘the kind of meditative space needed’ to concentrate purely on observational drawing as a professional scholarly practice ‘is increasingly constrained’.4 This project set out to reclaim observational drawing as a method to capture the ‘unquantifiable’ but ‘knowable’ dimensions of everyday residential landscapes during lockdown.","PeriodicalId":43606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","volume":"66 1","pages":"60 - 75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drawing during lockdown: Observing the ‘unquantifiable, but speculatively knowable’ dimensions of residential landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Porter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18626033.2022.2156103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goethe used the term ‘delicate empiricism’ to describe a disciplined process of prolonged empathetic observation, grounded in direct experience, using imagination, inspiration and intuition to encounter phenomena.1 Observational drawing, as an epistemological tool, can facilitate this kind of encounter. As design and drawing practitioner Laurie Olin asserts, drawing enables us to carefully observe ‘unquantifiable, but speculatively knowable, things: the nature of various places, the quality of light at different times, the manner of other people (or ourselves) . . . We learn through seeing, thinking about what we see, studying, and recording it in various ways by drawing.’2 In recent years there has been ‘a modest resurgence of interest within academia in the methodological affordance of observational sketching’,3 mostly in social sciences, anthropological fieldwork, geography and design schools. While drawing is regarded as a means of generating and recording knowledge of place—its past, present and potential future state—artist Gemma Anderson laments that ‘the kind of meditative space needed’ to concentrate purely on observational drawing as a professional scholarly practice ‘is increasingly constrained’.4 This project set out to reclaim observational drawing as a method to capture the ‘unquantifiable’ but ‘knowable’ dimensions of everyday residential landscapes during lockdown.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"60 - 75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Landscape Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2022.2156103\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Landscape Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2022.2156103","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Drawing during lockdown: Observing the ‘unquantifiable, but speculatively knowable’ dimensions of residential landscapes
Goethe used the term ‘delicate empiricism’ to describe a disciplined process of prolonged empathetic observation, grounded in direct experience, using imagination, inspiration and intuition to encounter phenomena.1 Observational drawing, as an epistemological tool, can facilitate this kind of encounter. As design and drawing practitioner Laurie Olin asserts, drawing enables us to carefully observe ‘unquantifiable, but speculatively knowable, things: the nature of various places, the quality of light at different times, the manner of other people (or ourselves) . . . We learn through seeing, thinking about what we see, studying, and recording it in various ways by drawing.’2 In recent years there has been ‘a modest resurgence of interest within academia in the methodological affordance of observational sketching’,3 mostly in social sciences, anthropological fieldwork, geography and design schools. While drawing is regarded as a means of generating and recording knowledge of place—its past, present and potential future state—artist Gemma Anderson laments that ‘the kind of meditative space needed’ to concentrate purely on observational drawing as a professional scholarly practice ‘is increasingly constrained’.4 This project set out to reclaim observational drawing as a method to capture the ‘unquantifiable’ but ‘knowable’ dimensions of everyday residential landscapes during lockdown.
期刊介绍:
JoLA is the academic Journal of the European Council of Landscape Architecture Schools (ECLAS), established in 2006. It is published three times a year. JoLA aims to support, stimulate, and extend scholarly debate in Landscape Architecture and related fields. It also gives space to the reflective practitioner and to design research. The journal welcomes articles addressing any aspect of Landscape Architecture, to cultivate the diverse identity of the discipline. JoLA is internationally oriented and seeks to both draw in and contribute to global perspectives through its four key sections: the ‘Articles’ section features both academic scholarship and research related to professional practice; the ‘Under the Sky’ section fosters research based on critical analysis and interpretation of built projects; the ‘Thinking Eye’ section presents research based on thoughtful experimentation in visual methodologies and media; the ‘Review’ section presents critical reflection on recent literature, conferences and/or exhibitions relevant to Landscape Architecture.