全国私人投保人群中患有疾病的妇女使用避孕药具的情况。

Steven W Champaloux, Naomi K Tepper, Kathryn M Curtis, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman, Polly A Marchbanks, Denise J Jamieson
{"title":"全国私人投保人群中患有疾病的妇女使用避孕药具的情况。","authors":"Steven W Champaloux, Naomi K Tepper, Kathryn M Curtis, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman, Polly A Marchbanks, Denise J Jamieson","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000001134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine contraceptive use among women with selected medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a nationwide health care claims database to identify women aged 15-44 years continuously enrolled in private insurance during 2004-2011 with and without selected medical conditions. We assessed current permanent and reversible prescription contraceptive use during October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2011, with diagnosis, procedure, and pharmacy codes and calculated prevalence by age and condition. We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate odds of female sterilization or reversible prescription methods compared with neither. Among users of reversible methods, we used logistic regression to calculate odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives compared with shorter acting methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A low proportion of women with medical conditions were using sterilization or reversible prescription methods (45% and 30% of women aged 15-34 and 35-44 years, respectively), and this proportion was consistently lower among the older age group across all medical conditions. Across both age groups, sterilization and long-acting reversible contraceptives were used less frequently than shorter acting methods (injectable, pill, patch, or ring). The odds of sterilization were higher among women with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-5.3) and 35-44 years (OR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2). Among women using reversible prescription methods, the odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives were increased among those with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 2.1-2.5) and 35-44 years (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the potential for serious maternal and fetal pregnancy-associated risks, contraceptive use was not optimal among women with medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>","PeriodicalId":81739,"journal":{"name":"Journal of tissue culture methods : Tissue Culture Association manual of cell, tissue, and organ culture procedures","volume":"12 1","pages":"1151-1159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contraceptive Use Among Women With Medical Conditions in a Nationwide Privately Insured Population.\",\"authors\":\"Steven W Champaloux, Naomi K Tepper, Kathryn M Curtis, Lauren B Zapata, Maura K Whiteman, Polly A Marchbanks, Denise J Jamieson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000001134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine contraceptive use among women with selected medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a nationwide health care claims database to identify women aged 15-44 years continuously enrolled in private insurance during 2004-2011 with and without selected medical conditions. We assessed current permanent and reversible prescription contraceptive use during October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2011, with diagnosis, procedure, and pharmacy codes and calculated prevalence by age and condition. We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate odds of female sterilization or reversible prescription methods compared with neither. Among users of reversible methods, we used logistic regression to calculate odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives compared with shorter acting methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A low proportion of women with medical conditions were using sterilization or reversible prescription methods (45% and 30% of women aged 15-34 and 35-44 years, respectively), and this proportion was consistently lower among the older age group across all medical conditions. Across both age groups, sterilization and long-acting reversible contraceptives were used less frequently than shorter acting methods (injectable, pill, patch, or ring). The odds of sterilization were higher among women with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-5.3) and 35-44 years (OR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2). Among women using reversible prescription methods, the odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives were increased among those with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 2.1-2.5) and 35-44 years (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the potential for serious maternal and fetal pregnancy-associated risks, contraceptive use was not optimal among women with medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of tissue culture methods : Tissue Culture Association manual of cell, tissue, and organ culture procedures\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1151-1159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11022835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of tissue culture methods : Tissue Culture Association manual of cell, tissue, and organ culture procedures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001134\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of tissue culture methods : Tissue Culture Association manual of cell, tissue, and organ culture procedures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的研究患有特定疾病的女性使用避孕药具的情况:我们利用全国范围内的医疗保健索赔数据库,对 2004-2011 年间连续加入私人保险的 15-44 岁女性进行了识别,包括患有和未患有特定疾病的女性。我们使用诊断、手术和药房代码评估了 2010 年 10 月 1 日至 2011 年 9 月 30 日期间永久性和可逆性处方避孕药的当前使用情况,并按年龄和病情计算了流行率。我们使用多态逻辑回归法计算了女性绝育或可逆处方避孕法与两者均未使用的几率。在可逆避孕方法的使用者中,我们使用逻辑回归法计算了使用长效可逆避孕药与短效避孕药的几率:有疾病的妇女使用绝育或可逆处方避孕法的比例较低(分别占 15-34 岁和 35-44 岁妇女的 45% 和 30%),在所有疾病中,这一比例在年龄较大的群体中一直较低。在这两个年龄组中,绝育和长效可逆避孕药的使用频率均低于短效避孕方法(注射、避孕药、避孕贴或避孕环)。在 15-34 岁和 35-44 岁的妇女中,有任何病症的妇女绝育的几率要高于没有病症的妇女(几率比 [OR] 4.9,95% 置信区间 [CI],4.5-5.3)(OR 1.2,95% 置信区间 [CI],1.1-1.2)。在使用可逆处方避孕法的女性中,15-34 岁(OR 2.2,95% CI,2.1-2.5)和 35-44 岁(OR 1.1,95% CI,1.1-1.2)的女性使用长效可逆避孕药的几率高于无条件的女性:结论:尽管可能会给孕产妇和胎儿带来严重的妊娠相关风险,但患有疾病的妇女使用避孕药具的效果并不理想:证据等级:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contraceptive Use Among Women With Medical Conditions in a Nationwide Privately Insured Population.

Objective: To examine contraceptive use among women with selected medical conditions.

Methods: We used a nationwide health care claims database to identify women aged 15-44 years continuously enrolled in private insurance during 2004-2011 with and without selected medical conditions. We assessed current permanent and reversible prescription contraceptive use during October 1, 2010, to September 30, 2011, with diagnosis, procedure, and pharmacy codes and calculated prevalence by age and condition. We used polytomous logistic regression to calculate odds of female sterilization or reversible prescription methods compared with neither. Among users of reversible methods, we used logistic regression to calculate odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives compared with shorter acting methods.

Results: A low proportion of women with medical conditions were using sterilization or reversible prescription methods (45% and 30% of women aged 15-34 and 35-44 years, respectively), and this proportion was consistently lower among the older age group across all medical conditions. Across both age groups, sterilization and long-acting reversible contraceptives were used less frequently than shorter acting methods (injectable, pill, patch, or ring). The odds of sterilization were higher among women with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (odds ratio [OR] 4.9, 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-5.3) and 35-44 years (OR 1.2, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2). Among women using reversible prescription methods, the odds of using long-acting reversible contraceptives were increased among those with any compared with no condition for women aged 15-34 years (OR 2.2, 95% CI, 2.1-2.5) and 35-44 years (OR 1.1, 95% CI, 1.1-1.2).

Conclusion: Despite the potential for serious maternal and fetal pregnancy-associated risks, contraceptive use was not optimal among women with medical conditions.

Level of evidence: III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contraceptive Use Among Women With Medical Conditions in a Nationwide Privately Insured Population. Crosslinked gelatin beads: A culture method for the study of cell adhesion and invasion Cytoscription: Computer controlled micropositioning of cell adhesion proteins and cells Purification of vitronectin from animal serum and plasma Purification of human plasma fibronectin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1