伦敦夜间古怪的地理

IF 1.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SOUNDINGS Pub Date : 2018-11-01 DOI:10.3898/SOUN.70.06.2018
B. Campkin, L. Marshall
{"title":"伦敦夜间古怪的地理","authors":"B. Campkin, L. Marshall","doi":"10.3898/SOUN.70.06.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are contradictory pulls in neoliberal cities. On the one hand there has been an acceptance of \nmainstream Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) identities, as celebrated for example \nthrough commercially sponsored and officially endorsed Pride rallies. On the other, real estate-led \nglobal city competitiveness is affecting our capacity to secure the heritage of queer publics, and for \nthem to keep a foothold in the spaces they have historically occupied. Internationally, researchers are \ncharting the effects of gentrification on neighbourhoods associated with LGBTQ+ communities. In the \nUK, since LGBTQ+ rights have been won in large part through European Union-led legislation, the \ntrajectory of an increasing liberalisation of attitudes and legal protections is not guaranteed. Recent \ndata shows losses of a wide range of cultural and social spaces, but the provision of LGBTQ+ nightvenues \nhas suffered an even more dramatic fall than has been seen for pubs in the UK overall; and \nLGBTQ+ night-venues have suffered disproportionately in London’s wider losses of nightclubs and \ngrassroots music venues, as they have been rapidly succumbing to commercial residential and \ninfrastructure-led developments. If pubs, generally, are important to the social life of neighbourhoods, \nLGBTQ+ venues function as vital infrastructure for these groups, providing spaces of care and \ncommunity against wider contexts of oppression and violence. In London, as in other cities \ninternationally, increasing attention is being paid to LGBTQ+ heritage alongside that of other minority \ngroups. But are these efforts in vain, given that t","PeriodicalId":45378,"journal":{"name":"SOUNDINGS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"London's nocturnal queer geographies\",\"authors\":\"B. Campkin, L. Marshall\",\"doi\":\"10.3898/SOUN.70.06.2018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are contradictory pulls in neoliberal cities. On the one hand there has been an acceptance of \\nmainstream Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) identities, as celebrated for example \\nthrough commercially sponsored and officially endorsed Pride rallies. On the other, real estate-led \\nglobal city competitiveness is affecting our capacity to secure the heritage of queer publics, and for \\nthem to keep a foothold in the spaces they have historically occupied. Internationally, researchers are \\ncharting the effects of gentrification on neighbourhoods associated with LGBTQ+ communities. In the \\nUK, since LGBTQ+ rights have been won in large part through European Union-led legislation, the \\ntrajectory of an increasing liberalisation of attitudes and legal protections is not guaranteed. Recent \\ndata shows losses of a wide range of cultural and social spaces, but the provision of LGBTQ+ nightvenues \\nhas suffered an even more dramatic fall than has been seen for pubs in the UK overall; and \\nLGBTQ+ night-venues have suffered disproportionately in London’s wider losses of nightclubs and \\ngrassroots music venues, as they have been rapidly succumbing to commercial residential and \\ninfrastructure-led developments. If pubs, generally, are important to the social life of neighbourhoods, \\nLGBTQ+ venues function as vital infrastructure for these groups, providing spaces of care and \\ncommunity against wider contexts of oppression and violence. In London, as in other cities \\ninternationally, increasing attention is being paid to LGBTQ+ heritage alongside that of other minority \\ngroups. But are these efforts in vain, given that t\",\"PeriodicalId\":45378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOUNDINGS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOUNDINGS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.70.06.2018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOUNDINGS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3898/SOUN.70.06.2018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

新自由主义城市中存在着相互矛盾的力量。一方面,人们已经接受了主流的女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和酷儿(LGBTQ+)身份,比如通过商业赞助和官方支持的骄傲集会来庆祝。另一方面,房地产主导的全球城市竞争力正在影响我们保护酷儿公众遗产的能力,以及他们在历史上占据的空间中站稳脚跟的能力。在国际上,研究人员正在绘制高档化对LGBTQ+社区相关社区的影响。在英国,由于LGBTQ+权利在很大程度上是通过欧盟主导的立法赢得的,因此态度和法律保护日益自由化的轨迹并没有得到保证。最近的数据显示,大量文化和社交空间的流失,但LGBTQ+夜生活场所的供应比英国整体酒吧遭受的降幅更大;LGBTQ+夜生活场所在伦敦夜店和草根音乐场所的广泛流失中遭受了不成比例的损失,因为它们迅速被商业住宅和基础设施主导的开发项目所取代。如果说酒吧通常对社区的社交生活很重要,那么LGBTQ+场所则是这些群体的重要基础设施,为他们提供照顾和社区的空间,以对抗更广泛的压迫和暴力。与国际上其他城市一样,伦敦越来越多地关注LGBTQ+和其他少数群体的遗产。但这些努力是徒劳的吗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
London's nocturnal queer geographies
There are contradictory pulls in neoliberal cities. On the one hand there has been an acceptance of mainstream Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) identities, as celebrated for example through commercially sponsored and officially endorsed Pride rallies. On the other, real estate-led global city competitiveness is affecting our capacity to secure the heritage of queer publics, and for them to keep a foothold in the spaces they have historically occupied. Internationally, researchers are charting the effects of gentrification on neighbourhoods associated with LGBTQ+ communities. In the UK, since LGBTQ+ rights have been won in large part through European Union-led legislation, the trajectory of an increasing liberalisation of attitudes and legal protections is not guaranteed. Recent data shows losses of a wide range of cultural and social spaces, but the provision of LGBTQ+ nightvenues has suffered an even more dramatic fall than has been seen for pubs in the UK overall; and LGBTQ+ night-venues have suffered disproportionately in London’s wider losses of nightclubs and grassroots music venues, as they have been rapidly succumbing to commercial residential and infrastructure-led developments. If pubs, generally, are important to the social life of neighbourhoods, LGBTQ+ venues function as vital infrastructure for these groups, providing spaces of care and community against wider contexts of oppression and violence. In London, as in other cities internationally, increasing attention is being paid to LGBTQ+ heritage alongside that of other minority groups. But are these efforts in vain, given that t
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SOUNDINGS
SOUNDINGS HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Eurocommunism: when the past and present of the European left meet Emergency thinking Law and order: what can we expect from an incoming Labour government? Urban communist politics of the everyday in Graz, Austria Eurocommunism: The rise and fall of a hopeful project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1