化疗方案调整对接受辅助或新辅助治疗方式的乳腺癌患者生存结局的影响

Gunasekaran Gobi Hariyanayagam, Sabri Wan Mohd Akmal Bin Wan, Gunasekaran Shargunan Selvanthan, Gunasekaran Sera Selvanthansundram, Selvarajoo Kavisha
{"title":"化疗方案调整对接受辅助或新辅助治疗方式的乳腺癌患者生存结局的影响","authors":"Gunasekaran Gobi Hariyanayagam, Sabri Wan Mohd Akmal Bin Wan, Gunasekaran Shargunan Selvanthan, Gunasekaran Sera Selvanthansundram, Selvarajoo Kavisha","doi":"10.23937/2378-3419/1410171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chemotherapy schedule has been reported to increase the risk of suboptimal outcomes among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with variying outcome between treatment modality. This study investigates the Overall Survival (OS) and Hazard of Death (HR) of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy schedule modification stratified against adjuvant (ACT) and neoadjuvant (NACT) treatment modalities. The data required for this study was extracted from hospital based registry. Those patients included in the study were adult female patients receiving chemotherapy between 2013 and 2017 and completed all six chemotherapy cycles. Patients who completed all cycle with a cumulative length of delay < 7 days was categorized as 'no schedule modification' and patients who completed all cycle with the cumulative length of delay ≥ 7 days were categorized as 'with schedule modification'. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survival curves for each covariate and the log rank test was used to evaluate the differences in survival times for each category. Among 124 patients included in the study,93 patients were censoredand 31 events was observed, providing an OS of 75.0% with a mean survival of 54.09 months (95% CI 49.36-58.83). There was significantly higher survival (p < 0.001) in ACT treatment (83.9%) and higher mortality in NACT treatment modalities (51.6%). Among ACT treatment modality, those with no schedule modification had a significant proportion of patients surviving(p = 0.04) compared to patients with schedule modification . The OS was significantly different between age (p = 0.013), stage (p = 0.022) and chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and no significant difference in the distribution in NACT modality. Our finding suggests that patients with advanced-stage might have better survival implications when the chemotherapy schedule is optimized. Thus, the risk versus benefit of schedule modification must be carefully managed to ensure optimal chemotherapeutic outcomes while balancing the concurrent toxicity.","PeriodicalId":13873,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Chemotherapy Schedule Modification on Survival Outcome among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Treatment Modalities\",\"authors\":\"Gunasekaran Gobi Hariyanayagam, Sabri Wan Mohd Akmal Bin Wan, Gunasekaran Shargunan Selvanthan, Gunasekaran Sera Selvanthansundram, Selvarajoo Kavisha\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2378-3419/1410171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chemotherapy schedule has been reported to increase the risk of suboptimal outcomes among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with variying outcome between treatment modality. This study investigates the Overall Survival (OS) and Hazard of Death (HR) of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy schedule modification stratified against adjuvant (ACT) and neoadjuvant (NACT) treatment modalities. The data required for this study was extracted from hospital based registry. Those patients included in the study were adult female patients receiving chemotherapy between 2013 and 2017 and completed all six chemotherapy cycles. Patients who completed all cycle with a cumulative length of delay < 7 days was categorized as 'no schedule modification' and patients who completed all cycle with the cumulative length of delay ≥ 7 days were categorized as 'with schedule modification'. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survival curves for each covariate and the log rank test was used to evaluate the differences in survival times for each category. Among 124 patients included in the study,93 patients were censoredand 31 events was observed, providing an OS of 75.0% with a mean survival of 54.09 months (95% CI 49.36-58.83). There was significantly higher survival (p < 0.001) in ACT treatment (83.9%) and higher mortality in NACT treatment modalities (51.6%). Among ACT treatment modality, those with no schedule modification had a significant proportion of patients surviving(p = 0.04) compared to patients with schedule modification . The OS was significantly different between age (p = 0.013), stage (p = 0.022) and chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and no significant difference in the distribution in NACT modality. Our finding suggests that patients with advanced-stage might have better survival implications when the chemotherapy schedule is optimized. Thus, the risk versus benefit of schedule modification must be carefully managed to ensure optimal chemotherapeutic outcomes while balancing the concurrent toxicity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of cancer and clinical research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cancer and clinical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3419/1410171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

据报道,化疗计划会增加接受化疗的癌症患者发生次优结果的风险,不同治疗方式的结果不同。本研究探讨了化疗方案调整对辅助(ACT)和新辅助(NACT)治疗方式分层的乳腺癌患者的总生存期(OS)和死亡风险(HR)。本研究所需的数据是从医院登记中提取的。纳入研究的患者是2013年至2017年间接受化疗的成年女性患者,并完成了所有六个化疗周期。完成所有周期且累计延迟长度< 7天的患者归类为“无时间表修改”,完成所有周期且累计延迟长度≥7天的患者归类为“有时间表修改”。Kaplan-Meier估计用于估计每个协变量的生存曲线,log rank检验用于评估每个类别的生存时间差异。在纳入研究的124例患者中,93例患者接受了检查,观察到31个事件,总生存率为75.0%,平均生存期为54.09个月(95% CI 49.36-58.83)。ACT治疗组的生存率(83.9%)显著高于NACT治疗组(51.6%),NACT治疗组的死亡率显著高于ACT治疗组(p < 0.001)。在ACT治疗方式中,未修改治疗方案的患者存活比例显著高于修改治疗方案的患者(p = 0.04)。OS在年龄(p = 0.013)、分期(p = 0.022)和化疗(p = 0.002)之间差异有统计学意义,NACT方式的分布无统计学意义。我们的发现表明,当化疗方案优化时,晚期患者可能有更好的生存意义。因此,必须仔细管理计划修改的风险与收益,以确保最佳的化疗结果,同时平衡并发毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Impact of Chemotherapy Schedule Modification on Survival Outcome among Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Treatment Modalities
Chemotherapy schedule has been reported to increase the risk of suboptimal outcomes among cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with variying outcome between treatment modality. This study investigates the Overall Survival (OS) and Hazard of Death (HR) of breast cancer patients with chemotherapy schedule modification stratified against adjuvant (ACT) and neoadjuvant (NACT) treatment modalities. The data required for this study was extracted from hospital based registry. Those patients included in the study were adult female patients receiving chemotherapy between 2013 and 2017 and completed all six chemotherapy cycles. Patients who completed all cycle with a cumulative length of delay < 7 days was categorized as 'no schedule modification' and patients who completed all cycle with the cumulative length of delay ≥ 7 days were categorized as 'with schedule modification'. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to estimate survival curves for each covariate and the log rank test was used to evaluate the differences in survival times for each category. Among 124 patients included in the study,93 patients were censoredand 31 events was observed, providing an OS of 75.0% with a mean survival of 54.09 months (95% CI 49.36-58.83). There was significantly higher survival (p < 0.001) in ACT treatment (83.9%) and higher mortality in NACT treatment modalities (51.6%). Among ACT treatment modality, those with no schedule modification had a significant proportion of patients surviving(p = 0.04) compared to patients with schedule modification . The OS was significantly different between age (p = 0.013), stage (p = 0.022) and chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and no significant difference in the distribution in NACT modality. Our finding suggests that patients with advanced-stage might have better survival implications when the chemotherapy schedule is optimized. Thus, the risk versus benefit of schedule modification must be carefully managed to ensure optimal chemotherapeutic outcomes while balancing the concurrent toxicity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Epidemiological Study of Penile Cancer in Northeast Brazil Punicic Acid Inhibits Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis in Human MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy vs. Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Dosimetric Study Alterations of Serum Lipids Profiles in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers Intercalary Endoprosthetic Reconstruction for Long Bone Defects of the Lower Extremity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1