2型糖尿病患者转诊到初级和专科护理的原因分析。途径研究

Francisco Javier Escalada , Patxi Ezkurra , Juan Carlos Ferrer , Carlos Ortega , Cecilia Roldán , Beatriu Font , en nombre de los investigadores del Estudio Pathways
{"title":"2型糖尿病患者转诊到初级和专科护理的原因分析。途径研究","authors":"Francisco Javier Escalada ,&nbsp;Patxi Ezkurra ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ferrer ,&nbsp;Carlos Ortega ,&nbsp;Cecilia Roldán ,&nbsp;Beatriu Font ,&nbsp;en nombre de los investigadores del Estudio Pathways","doi":"10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the reasons for referral of type<!--> <!-->2 diabetes (T2DM) patients from primary care (PC) to specialized care (SC) in Spain. To assess the level of compliance with referral criteria established in national recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, cross-sectional, multi-centre national study, in PC and SC. Each physician provided, using a structured case report form, data on usual practice for T2DM patient referral and data about referral of 6<!--> <!-->patients. Recommendations of the Spanish Society for Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the National Health System (NHS) were used as reference documents to assess compliance. Data from clinical practice of 143 professionals of SC/641 general practitioners (GPs) and from referrals of 805<!--> <!-->patients to PC/3,624 to SC are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Almost one-third (31.8%) of GPs and 46.2% of SC professionals reported the existence of a coordination protocol with the other healthcare level. The most frequent communication tool for referrals to SC was a Consultation Report (89.2%), and the Medical History for referrals to PC. The referral criterion to SC most frequently declared was Metabolic Instability (80.5%) and to PC was Goal Achievement (96.5%). The most frequent cause for referral to SC among the patients studied was Reassessment (48.4%) and to PC Goal Achievement (91.6%). Almost half (46.8%) of GPs applied all NHS criteria in usual practice, and 3.9% all SEEN referral criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The number of reported coordination protocols is low, and the compliance with national guidelines is poor.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100152,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Diabetología","volume":"29 3","pages":"Pages 60-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.03.001","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Análisis sobre los motivos de derivación de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 entre atención primaria y atención especializada. Estudio Pathways\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Javier Escalada ,&nbsp;Patxi Ezkurra ,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Ferrer ,&nbsp;Carlos Ortega ,&nbsp;Cecilia Roldán ,&nbsp;Beatriu Font ,&nbsp;en nombre de los investigadores del Estudio Pathways\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the reasons for referral of type<!--> <!-->2 diabetes (T2DM) patients from primary care (PC) to specialized care (SC) in Spain. To assess the level of compliance with referral criteria established in national recommendations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Observational, cross-sectional, multi-centre national study, in PC and SC. Each physician provided, using a structured case report form, data on usual practice for T2DM patient referral and data about referral of 6<!--> <!-->patients. Recommendations of the Spanish Society for Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the National Health System (NHS) were used as reference documents to assess compliance. Data from clinical practice of 143 professionals of SC/641 general practitioners (GPs) and from referrals of 805<!--> <!-->patients to PC/3,624 to SC are presented.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Almost one-third (31.8%) of GPs and 46.2% of SC professionals reported the existence of a coordination protocol with the other healthcare level. The most frequent communication tool for referrals to SC was a Consultation Report (89.2%), and the Medical History for referrals to PC. The referral criterion to SC most frequently declared was Metabolic Instability (80.5%) and to PC was Goal Achievement (96.5%). The most frequent cause for referral to SC among the patients studied was Reassessment (48.4%) and to PC Goal Achievement (91.6%). Almost half (46.8%) of GPs applied all NHS criteria in usual practice, and 3.9% all SEEN referral criteria.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The number of reported coordination protocols is low, and the compliance with national guidelines is poor.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avances en Diabetología\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 60-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.avdiab.2013.03.001\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avances en Diabetología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323013000215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Diabetología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134323013000215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的评估西班牙2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者从初级保健(PC)转诊到专科护理(SC)的原因。评估对国家建议中规定的转诊标准的遵守程度。方法观察性、横断面、多中心的全国性研究,在PC和SC中进行。每位医生使用结构化的病例报告表格提供T2DM患者转诊的常规做法数据和6例患者的转诊数据。西班牙内分泌与营养学会(SEEN)和国家卫生系统(NHS)的建议被用作评估依从性的参考文件。本文介绍了143名SC专业人员/641名全科医生(gp)的临床实践数据,以及805名转介到PC/ 3624名转介到SC的患者的数据。结果近三分之一(31.8%)的全科医生和46.2%的SC专业人员报告存在与其他医疗保健水平的协调协议。转诊到SC的最常用的沟通工具是咨询报告(89.2%),转诊到PC的最常用的沟通工具是病史。SC的转诊标准为代谢不稳定(80.5%),PC的转诊标准为目标实现(96.5%)。在研究的患者中,转诊到SC的最常见原因是重新评估(48.4%)和实现PC目标(91.6%)。几乎一半(46.8%)的全科医生在日常实践中采用了所有NHS标准,3.9%的全科医生采用了所有see转诊标准。结论报告的协调方案数量少,对国家指南的符合性差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Análisis sobre los motivos de derivación de pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 entre atención primaria y atención especializada. Estudio Pathways

Objectives

To assess the reasons for referral of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients from primary care (PC) to specialized care (SC) in Spain. To assess the level of compliance with referral criteria established in national recommendations.

Methods

Observational, cross-sectional, multi-centre national study, in PC and SC. Each physician provided, using a structured case report form, data on usual practice for T2DM patient referral and data about referral of 6 patients. Recommendations of the Spanish Society for Endocrinology and Nutrition (SEEN) and the National Health System (NHS) were used as reference documents to assess compliance. Data from clinical practice of 143 professionals of SC/641 general practitioners (GPs) and from referrals of 805 patients to PC/3,624 to SC are presented.

Results

Almost one-third (31.8%) of GPs and 46.2% of SC professionals reported the existence of a coordination protocol with the other healthcare level. The most frequent communication tool for referrals to SC was a Consultation Report (89.2%), and the Medical History for referrals to PC. The referral criterion to SC most frequently declared was Metabolic Instability (80.5%) and to PC was Goal Achievement (96.5%). The most frequent cause for referral to SC among the patients studied was Reassessment (48.4%) and to PC Goal Achievement (91.6%). Almost half (46.8%) of GPs applied all NHS criteria in usual practice, and 3.9% all SEEN referral criteria.

Conclusions

The number of reported coordination protocols is low, and the compliance with national guidelines is poor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluación de la satisfacción del paciente diabético con la utilización del glucómetro portátil BGSTAR© mediante el cuestionario SATIGLU Escalas de cálculo del riesgo cardiovascular para pacientes con diabetes. ¿Qué son y de qué nos sirven? Reunión anual del grupo de trabajo «islotes pancreáticos» de la Sociedad Española de Diabetes Documento de consenso sobre el tratamiento con infusión subcutánea continua de insulina en el medio hospitalario Claves para avanzar hacia un rol más activo por parte del paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en España
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1