当前国家检察官在法庭上的利益代表问题

Hlib Rybalko
{"title":"当前国家检察官在法庭上的利益代表问题","authors":"Hlib Rybalko","doi":"10.26565/2075-1834-2021-32-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the grounds for representing the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor. Since 2016, as a result of the implementation of constitutional reform in the field of justice, the prosecutor's office represents the interests of the state in the courts in exceptional cases and in the manner prescribed by law. The issue of representation by the prosecutor's office has recently become increasingly important, as both the number of legal disputes and the lack of protection of state interests by the relevant competent authorities are growing. Issues of a practical nature related to the implementation of this constitutional function of the prosecutor's office are becoming more and more acute, including different interpretations of \"exceptional cases of representation\", \"public interest\", \"authorized subject of power\" \", Which are key to establishing the existence of grounds for the prosecutor to represent the interests of the state in court. The analysis of such concepts as \"exceptional cases\", \"inaction\" of the competent authority (to protect the interests of the state), \"failure to protect\", \"improper protection\". Emphasis is placed on the fact that in case of non-exercise or improper exercise by a state authority, local government or other subject of power, which is responsible for the relevant powers, protection of state interests, as well as signs of administrative or criminal offenses. nature, if there are grounds, the prosecutor must perform the actions provided by law to initiate the relevant proceedings. All this leads to the fact that the possibility of representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor increasingly acquires elements of \"exclusive representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor\".","PeriodicalId":33522,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CURRENT ISSUES OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR'S INTERESTS IN COURT\",\"authors\":\"Hlib Rybalko\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2075-1834-2021-32-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the grounds for representing the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor. Since 2016, as a result of the implementation of constitutional reform in the field of justice, the prosecutor's office represents the interests of the state in the courts in exceptional cases and in the manner prescribed by law. The issue of representation by the prosecutor's office has recently become increasingly important, as both the number of legal disputes and the lack of protection of state interests by the relevant competent authorities are growing. Issues of a practical nature related to the implementation of this constitutional function of the prosecutor's office are becoming more and more acute, including different interpretations of \\\"exceptional cases of representation\\\", \\\"public interest\\\", \\\"authorized subject of power\\\" \\\", Which are key to establishing the existence of grounds for the prosecutor to represent the interests of the state in court. The analysis of such concepts as \\\"exceptional cases\\\", \\\"inaction\\\" of the competent authority (to protect the interests of the state), \\\"failure to protect\\\", \\\"improper protection\\\". Emphasis is placed on the fact that in case of non-exercise or improper exercise by a state authority, local government or other subject of power, which is responsible for the relevant powers, protection of state interests, as well as signs of administrative or criminal offenses. nature, if there are grounds, the prosecutor must perform the actions provided by law to initiate the relevant proceedings. All this leads to the fact that the possibility of representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor increasingly acquires elements of \\\"exclusive representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":33522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1834-2021-32-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2075-1834-2021-32-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章专门讨论了检察官在法庭上代表国家利益的理由。自2016年以来,由于在司法领域实施宪法改革,检察官办公室在例外情况下以法律规定的方式在法院代表国家利益。检察官办公室的代表问题最近变得越来越重要,因为法律纠纷的数量和有关主管当局缺乏对国家利益的保护都在增加。与检察官行使这一宪法职能有关的现实问题越来越尖锐,包括对“代表的例外情况”、“公共利益”、“授权的权力主体”的不同解释,这些都是确立检察官在法庭上代表国家利益的理由是否存在的关键。分析了“例外情况”、主管机关“不作为”(保护国家利益)、“保护不力”、“保护不当”等概念。重点是国家机关、地方政府或其他负有相关权力的权力主体不行使或行使不当,维护国家利益,有行政犯罪或刑事犯罪的迹象。性质上,如果有理由,检察官必须履行法律规定的行动,提起有关诉讼。这一切导致检察官在法庭上代表国家利益的可能性越来越多地获得“检察官在法庭上独家代表国家利益”的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CURRENT ISSUES OF THE REPRESENTATION OF THE STATE PROSECUTOR'S INTERESTS IN COURT
The article is devoted to the grounds for representing the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor. Since 2016, as a result of the implementation of constitutional reform in the field of justice, the prosecutor's office represents the interests of the state in the courts in exceptional cases and in the manner prescribed by law. The issue of representation by the prosecutor's office has recently become increasingly important, as both the number of legal disputes and the lack of protection of state interests by the relevant competent authorities are growing. Issues of a practical nature related to the implementation of this constitutional function of the prosecutor's office are becoming more and more acute, including different interpretations of "exceptional cases of representation", "public interest", "authorized subject of power" ", Which are key to establishing the existence of grounds for the prosecutor to represent the interests of the state in court. The analysis of such concepts as "exceptional cases", "inaction" of the competent authority (to protect the interests of the state), "failure to protect", "improper protection". Emphasis is placed on the fact that in case of non-exercise or improper exercise by a state authority, local government or other subject of power, which is responsible for the relevant powers, protection of state interests, as well as signs of administrative or criminal offenses. nature, if there are grounds, the prosecutor must perform the actions provided by law to initiate the relevant proceedings. All this leads to the fact that the possibility of representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor increasingly acquires elements of "exclusive representation of the interests of the state in court by the prosecutor".
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the business process through reengineering Clinical trials market: state and prospects, IT segment The use of tools of business communication culture during business negotiations Ecologization of production as an innovative direction for the development of domestic business entities Multifactor econometric models of the standard of living of the population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1