正常和肿瘤结直肠组织中的透明质酸:电喷雾电离质谱和荧光分析

A. Marolla, J. Waisberg, G. T. Saba, D. Germini, M. Pinhal
{"title":"正常和肿瘤结直肠组织中的透明质酸:电喷雾电离质谱和荧光分析","authors":"A. Marolla, J. Waisberg, G. T. Saba, D. Germini, M. Pinhal","doi":"10.4103/2395-3977.184319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the expression of hyaluronic acid (HA) and its type in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-neoplastic mucosa tissues. Methods : The study included 64 adult CRC patients, who met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two tissue samples (neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa) from each patient′s large intestine were collected and were subjected to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and fluorimetric assays. Results: The analysis of colorectal neoplastic tissue and non-neoplastic mucosa by ESI-MS allowed the identification of HA and its oligosaccharide fragments. Low molecular weight (LMW), nonbiotinylated isoform of HA, and its fragments were identified in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa. The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue (0.561 mg HA/g tissue) than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa (0.579 mg HA/g tissue), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.87). This result was probably influenced by the nonbiotinylated LMW-HA. For the specific group of patients that did not present lymph node metastasis, the average HA levels were higher in tumor tissue (0.674 mg HA/g tissue) than in non-neoplastic tissue (0.529 mg HA/g tissue), which managed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.04). For the group of patients with lymph node involvement, no difference between tumor and nontumor tissue was observed. The HA expression among the tumor tissues within the variables of each clinicopathological parameters assessed failed to elicit any significant difference (location, P = 0.62; size, P = 0.13; lymph node invasion, P = 0.57; degree of cellular differentiation, P = 0.46; venous infiltration, P = 0.73; lymphatic infiltration, P = 0.36; neural infiltration, P = 0.28; tumor node metastasis classification, P = 0.15; and presence of synchronous metastases, P = 0.35; initial versus advanced stage, P = 0.37). Conclusions: The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa, although this difference was not statistically significant. This finding probably influenced the lower expression of HA in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa. Compared to normal tissues, HA levels are significantly increased in the tumor tissues unless they exhibit lymph node metastasis. Otherwise, the expression of HA in tumor tissue did not correlated with the other clinicopathological parameters.","PeriodicalId":9428,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Translational Medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"79 - 84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hyaluronic Acid in Normal and Neoplastic Colorectal Tissue: Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric and Fluor Metric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"A. Marolla, J. Waisberg, G. T. Saba, D. Germini, M. Pinhal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2395-3977.184319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the expression of hyaluronic acid (HA) and its type in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-neoplastic mucosa tissues. Methods : The study included 64 adult CRC patients, who met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two tissue samples (neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa) from each patient′s large intestine were collected and were subjected to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and fluorimetric assays. Results: The analysis of colorectal neoplastic tissue and non-neoplastic mucosa by ESI-MS allowed the identification of HA and its oligosaccharide fragments. Low molecular weight (LMW), nonbiotinylated isoform of HA, and its fragments were identified in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa. The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue (0.561 mg HA/g tissue) than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa (0.579 mg HA/g tissue), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.87). This result was probably influenced by the nonbiotinylated LMW-HA. For the specific group of patients that did not present lymph node metastasis, the average HA levels were higher in tumor tissue (0.674 mg HA/g tissue) than in non-neoplastic tissue (0.529 mg HA/g tissue), which managed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.04). For the group of patients with lymph node involvement, no difference between tumor and nontumor tissue was observed. The HA expression among the tumor tissues within the variables of each clinicopathological parameters assessed failed to elicit any significant difference (location, P = 0.62; size, P = 0.13; lymph node invasion, P = 0.57; degree of cellular differentiation, P = 0.46; venous infiltration, P = 0.73; lymphatic infiltration, P = 0.36; neural infiltration, P = 0.28; tumor node metastasis classification, P = 0.15; and presence of synchronous metastases, P = 0.35; initial versus advanced stage, P = 0.37). Conclusions: The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa, although this difference was not statistically significant. This finding probably influenced the lower expression of HA in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa. Compared to normal tissues, HA levels are significantly increased in the tumor tissues unless they exhibit lymph node metastasis. Otherwise, the expression of HA in tumor tissue did not correlated with the other clinicopathological parameters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Translational Medicine\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"79 - 84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Translational Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-3977.184319\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2395-3977.184319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:分析透明质酸(HA)在人类结直肠癌(CRC)和非肿瘤性粘膜组织中的表达及其分型。方法:本研究纳入64例符合纳入和排除标准的成年结直肠癌患者。从每个患者的大肠中收集两份组织样本(肿瘤和非肿瘤粘膜),并进行电喷雾电离质谱(ESI-MS)和荧光测定。结果:用ESI-MS对结直肠肿瘤组织和非肿瘤粘膜进行分析,鉴定出HA及其寡糖片段。低分子量(LMW),非生物素化的透明质酸异构体及其片段在肿瘤和非肿瘤粘膜中都被鉴定出来。HA在肿瘤组织中的表达(0.561 mg HA/g组织)略低于结直肠非肿瘤粘膜中的表达(0.579 mg HA/g组织),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.87)。这一结果可能受到非生物素化LMW-HA的影响。对于未出现淋巴结转移的特定组患者,肿瘤组织HA平均水平(0.674 mg HA/g)高于非肿瘤组织HA平均水平(0.529 mg HA/g),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.04)。对于淋巴结受累的患者组,肿瘤组织和非肿瘤组织之间没有差异。在评估的各临床病理参数变量内,HA在肿瘤组织中的表达没有引起任何显著差异(位置,P = 0.62;大小,P = 0.13;淋巴结浸润,P = 0.57;细胞分化程度,P = 0.46;静脉浸润,P = 0.73;淋巴浸润,P = 0.36;神经浸润,P = 0.28;肿瘤淋巴结转移分型,P = 0.15;同步转移的存在,P = 0.35;初期与晚期,P = 0.37)。结论:HA在肿瘤组织中的表达略低于结直肠非肿瘤性粘膜,但差异无统计学意义。这一发现可能影响了HA在肿瘤组织中的表达低于结直肠非肿瘤性粘膜。与正常组织相比,除非肿瘤组织出现淋巴结转移,否则血凝素水平显著升高。除此之外,HA在肿瘤组织中的表达与其他临床病理参数没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hyaluronic Acid in Normal and Neoplastic Colorectal Tissue: Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometric and Fluor Metric Analysis
Aim: The aim of the study was to analyze the expression of hyaluronic acid (HA) and its type in human colorectal cancer (CRC) and non-neoplastic mucosa tissues. Methods : The study included 64 adult CRC patients, who met all the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two tissue samples (neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa) from each patient′s large intestine were collected and were subjected to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and fluorimetric assays. Results: The analysis of colorectal neoplastic tissue and non-neoplastic mucosa by ESI-MS allowed the identification of HA and its oligosaccharide fragments. Low molecular weight (LMW), nonbiotinylated isoform of HA, and its fragments were identified in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosa. The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue (0.561 mg HA/g tissue) than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa (0.579 mg HA/g tissue), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.87). This result was probably influenced by the nonbiotinylated LMW-HA. For the specific group of patients that did not present lymph node metastasis, the average HA levels were higher in tumor tissue (0.674 mg HA/g tissue) than in non-neoplastic tissue (0.529 mg HA/g tissue), which managed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.04). For the group of patients with lymph node involvement, no difference between tumor and nontumor tissue was observed. The HA expression among the tumor tissues within the variables of each clinicopathological parameters assessed failed to elicit any significant difference (location, P = 0.62; size, P = 0.13; lymph node invasion, P = 0.57; degree of cellular differentiation, P = 0.46; venous infiltration, P = 0.73; lymphatic infiltration, P = 0.36; neural infiltration, P = 0.28; tumor node metastasis classification, P = 0.15; and presence of synchronous metastases, P = 0.35; initial versus advanced stage, P = 0.37). Conclusions: The expression of HA was found to be slightly lower in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa, although this difference was not statistically significant. This finding probably influenced the lower expression of HA in tumor tissue than in colorectal non-neoplastic mucosa. Compared to normal tissues, HA levels are significantly increased in the tumor tissues unless they exhibit lymph node metastasis. Otherwise, the expression of HA in tumor tissue did not correlated with the other clinicopathological parameters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyclooxygenase-2 contributes to mutant epidermal growth factor receptor lung tumorigenesis by promoting an immunosuppressive environment Comparison of histopathological grading and staging of breast cancer with p53-positive and transforming growth factor-beta receptor 2-negative immunohistochemical marker expression cases Characteristics and outcome of patients with pheochromocytoma Chemical compositions and antiproliferative effect of essential oil of asafoetida on MCF7 human breast cancer cell line and female wistar rats Protein disulfide isomerase A3: A potential regulatory factor of colon epithelial cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1