{"title":"同伴评鉴效度是评鉴者智力和评鉴得分的函数。项目mr005.13-5001,子任务1,代表24。","authors":"R. Doll","doi":"10.1037/e439952004-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.","PeriodicalId":78941,"journal":{"name":"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PEER RATING VALIDITY AS A FUNCTION OF RATER INTELLIGENCE AND RATING SCORE RECEIVED. PROJ MR005.13-5001, SUBTASK 1, REP 24.\",\"authors\":\"R. Doll\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e439952004-001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1963-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e439952004-001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research report. Naval School of Aviation Medicine (U.S.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e439952004-001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PEER RATING VALIDITY AS A FUNCTION OF RATER INTELLIGENCE AND RATING SCORE RECEIVED. PROJ MR005.13-5001, SUBTASK 1, REP 24.
Abstract : Results from three analytic approaches to the records of 548 cadets demonstrate that when deal ing with a population having generally above average intelligence there is little reason to take into consideration rather intelligence when concerned with the validity of the ratings he gives. This is also true for the Peer Rating score received by the rater.