在测试广义沟通和语言的组间实验中对治疗分配的盲目性的基本原理

P. Yoder, M. Crandall
{"title":"在测试广义沟通和语言的组间实验中对治疗分配的盲目性的基本原理","authors":"P. Yoder, M. Crandall","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2019.1683948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Blindness to participants’ assigned treatment group is an essential protection against detection bias in between-group experimental designs testing treatment effects on generalized communication and language competence. Blindness to treatment group cannot be achieved when the other people in the communication sample (e.g. parents or peers) or the reporters of children’s communication or language behavior (e.g. parents or teachers) are also the implementers of the treatment. Internally valid between-group experiments measure generalized communication and language in ways that are constant across treatment groups by examiners who are blind to treatment assignment. When language or communication samples are used to measure generalized skills or developmental level, staff members who are blind to treatment assignment must conduct the data reduction methods (e.g. transcription, verification, and coding). Otherwise, the children’s skill level can be inadvertently over-estimated in the treatment group relative to those in the control group.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"43 1","pages":"225 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale for blindness to treatment assignment in between-group experiments testing generalized communication and language\",\"authors\":\"P. Yoder, M. Crandall\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17489539.2019.1683948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Blindness to participants’ assigned treatment group is an essential protection against detection bias in between-group experimental designs testing treatment effects on generalized communication and language competence. Blindness to treatment group cannot be achieved when the other people in the communication sample (e.g. parents or peers) or the reporters of children’s communication or language behavior (e.g. parents or teachers) are also the implementers of the treatment. Internally valid between-group experiments measure generalized communication and language in ways that are constant across treatment groups by examiners who are blind to treatment assignment. When language or communication samples are used to measure generalized skills or developmental level, staff members who are blind to treatment assignment must conduct the data reduction methods (e.g. transcription, verification, and coding). Otherwise, the children’s skill level can be inadvertently over-estimated in the treatment group relative to those in the control group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1683948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1683948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在测试治疗对广义交际和语言能力影响的组间实验设计中,对被试指定治疗组的盲性是防止检测偏倚的必要保护。当交际样本中的其他人(如父母或同伴)或儿童交际或语言行为的报告者(如父母或老师)同时也是治疗的实施者时,就无法实现对治疗组的盲目性。内部有效的组间实验通过对治疗分配视而不见的考官以在治疗组中保持不变的方式测量广义交流和语言。当使用语言或交流样本来衡量一般技能或发展水平时,对治疗分配一无所知的工作人员必须执行数据简化方法(例如转录、验证和编码)。否则,与对照组相比,治疗组儿童的技能水平可能会被不经意地高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rationale for blindness to treatment assignment in between-group experiments testing generalized communication and language
Abstract Blindness to participants’ assigned treatment group is an essential protection against detection bias in between-group experimental designs testing treatment effects on generalized communication and language competence. Blindness to treatment group cannot be achieved when the other people in the communication sample (e.g. parents or peers) or the reporters of children’s communication or language behavior (e.g. parents or teachers) are also the implementers of the treatment. Internally valid between-group experiments measure generalized communication and language in ways that are constant across treatment groups by examiners who are blind to treatment assignment. When language or communication samples are used to measure generalized skills or developmental level, staff members who are blind to treatment assignment must conduct the data reduction methods (e.g. transcription, verification, and coding). Otherwise, the children’s skill level can be inadvertently over-estimated in the treatment group relative to those in the control group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
期刊最新文献
Illusions of literacy in nonspeaking autistic people: a response to Jaswal, Lampi & Stockwell, 2024 Childhood-Onset Fluency Disorder with marked ingressive speech: a prospective case study Initial results of single-case design study indicate parent training on naturalistic behavioral intervention conducted via telehealth improves parent fidelity and collateral child mands, tacts and intraverbals Preliminary evidence a behavior chain interruption strategy is a promising approach for teaching functional mands to individuals with deaf-blindness and an intellectual disability Can message-passing anecdotes tell us anything about the validity of RPM and S2C?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1