Kariann R Drwal, Delanie Hurst, Bonnie J Wakefield
{"title":"退伍军人家庭肺康复计划的有效性。","authors":"Kariann R Drwal, Delanie Hurst, Bonnie J Wakefield","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2022.0050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> <i>This study examined the effectiveness and safety of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program in Veterans.</i> <b><i>Methods:</i></b> <i>Patients were evaluated from five Veteran Affairs facilities that enrolled in the 12-week program. Pre- to postchanges were completed on clinical outcomes using paired</i> t<i>-tests and the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.</i> <b><i>Results:</i></b> <i>Two hundred eighty-five patients with a mean age of 69.6 ± 8.3 years enrolled in the HBPR program from October 2018 to March 2020. There was a 62% (</i>n<i> = 176) completion rate of both pre- and post assessments. Significant improvements were detected after completion of the HBPR program in dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council: 3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance: 263.1 m ± 96.6 m vs. 311.0 m ± 103.6 m;</i> p <i>< 0.0001; Duke Activity Status Index: 13.8 ± 9.6 vs. 20.0 ± 12.7;</i> p <i>< 0.0001; self-reported steps per day: 1514.5 ± 1360.4 vs. 3033.8 ± 2716.2;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); depression (patient health questionnaire-9: 8.3 ± 5.7 vs. 6.4 ± 5.1); nutrition habits (rate your plate, heart: 45.3 ± 9.0 vs. 48.9 ± 9.2;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); multicomponent assessment tools (BODE Index: 5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4;</i> p <i>< 0.0001), GOLD ABCD Assessment: p < 0.0009); and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test: 25.4 ± 7.7 vs. 18.7 ± 8.5;</i> p <i>< 0.0001). No adverse events were reported due to participation in HBPR.</i> <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> <i>The HBPR program is a safe and effective model and provides an additional option to address the gap in pulmonary rehabilitation access and utilization in the Veterans Affairs.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":50580,"journal":{"name":"Differential Equations","volume":"36 1","pages":"2456-2465"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Veterans.\",\"authors\":\"Kariann R Drwal, Delanie Hurst, Bonnie J Wakefield\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2022.0050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> <i>This study examined the effectiveness and safety of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program in Veterans.</i> <b><i>Methods:</i></b> <i>Patients were evaluated from five Veteran Affairs facilities that enrolled in the 12-week program. Pre- to postchanges were completed on clinical outcomes using paired</i> t<i>-tests and the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.</i> <b><i>Results:</i></b> <i>Two hundred eighty-five patients with a mean age of 69.6 ± 8.3 years enrolled in the HBPR program from October 2018 to March 2020. There was a 62% (</i>n<i> = 176) completion rate of both pre- and post assessments. Significant improvements were detected after completion of the HBPR program in dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council: 3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance: 263.1 m ± 96.6 m vs. 311.0 m ± 103.6 m;</i> p <i>< 0.0001; Duke Activity Status Index: 13.8 ± 9.6 vs. 20.0 ± 12.7;</i> p <i>< 0.0001; self-reported steps per day: 1514.5 ± 1360.4 vs. 3033.8 ± 2716.2;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); depression (patient health questionnaire-9: 8.3 ± 5.7 vs. 6.4 ± 5.1); nutrition habits (rate your plate, heart: 45.3 ± 9.0 vs. 48.9 ± 9.2;</i> p <i>< 0.0001); multicomponent assessment tools (BODE Index: 5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4;</i> p <i>< 0.0001), GOLD ABCD Assessment: p < 0.0009); and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test: 25.4 ± 7.7 vs. 18.7 ± 8.5;</i> p <i>< 0.0001). No adverse events were reported due to participation in HBPR.</i> <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> <i>The HBPR program is a safe and effective model and provides an additional option to address the gap in pulmonary rehabilitation access and utilization in the Veterans Affairs.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Differential Equations\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"2456-2465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Differential Equations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0050\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Differential Equations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究探讨了退伍军人家庭肺康复(HBPR)计划的有效性和安全性。方法:对五个退伍军人事务机构中参加为期 12 周项目的患者进行评估。使用配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩和检验完成临床结果的前后对比。对患者人口统计学、急诊就诊和住院情况进行了描述性统计。结果2018 年 10 月至 2020 年 3 月期间,有 285 名平均年龄为 69.6 ± 8.3 岁的患者参加了 HBPR 计划。前后评估的完成率均为 62%(n = 176)。完成 HBPR 计划后,呼吸困难的情况有了明显改善(修改后的医学研究委员会:3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1; p p < 0.0001; 杜克活动状态指数:13.8 ± 9.6 vs. 20.0 ± 12.7;p < 0.0001;自我报告的每天步数:1514.5 ± 1360.4 vs. 3033.8 ± 2716.2;p p < 0.0001);多成分评估工具(BODE 指数:5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4;p < 0.0001),GOLD ABCD 评估:p p < 0.0001)。没有因参加 HBPR 而出现不良反应的报告。结论:HBPR 计划是一种安全、有效的模式,为解决退伍军人事务部在肺康复治疗和利用方面的不足提供了另一种选择。
Effectiveness of a Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in Veterans.
Purpose:This study examined the effectiveness and safety of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HBPR) program in Veterans.Methods:Patients were evaluated from five Veteran Affairs facilities that enrolled in the 12-week program. Pre- to postchanges were completed on clinical outcomes using paired t-tests and the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics, emergency room visits, and hospitalizations.Results:Two hundred eighty-five patients with a mean age of 69.6 ± 8.3 years enrolled in the HBPR program from October 2018 to March 2020. There was a 62% (n = 176) completion rate of both pre- and post assessments. Significant improvements were detected after completion of the HBPR program in dyspnea (modified Medical Research Council: 3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 1.9 ± 1.1; p < 0.0001); exercise capacity (six-minute walk distance: 263.1 m ± 96.6 m vs. 311.0 m ± 103.6 m; p < 0.0001; Duke Activity Status Index: 13.8 ± 9.6 vs. 20.0 ± 12.7; p < 0.0001; self-reported steps per day: 1514.5 ± 1360.4 vs. 3033.8 ± 2716.2; p < 0.0001); depression (patient health questionnaire-9: 8.3 ± 5.7 vs. 6.4 ± 5.1); nutrition habits (rate your plate, heart: 45.3 ± 9.0 vs. 48.9 ± 9.2; p < 0.0001); multicomponent assessment tools (BODE Index: 5.1 ± 2.5 vs. 3.4 ± 2.4; p < 0.0001), GOLD ABCD Assessment: p < 0.0009); and quality of life (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test: 25.4 ± 7.7 vs. 18.7 ± 8.5; p < 0.0001). No adverse events were reported due to participation in HBPR.Conclusions:The HBPR program is a safe and effective model and provides an additional option to address the gap in pulmonary rehabilitation access and utilization in the Veterans Affairs.
期刊介绍:
Differential Equations is a journal devoted to differential equations and the associated integral equations. The journal publishes original articles by authors from all countries and accepts manuscripts in English and Russian. The topics of the journal cover ordinary differential equations, partial differential equations, spectral theory of differential operators, integral and integral–differential equations, difference equations and their applications in control theory, mathematical modeling, shell theory, informatics, and oscillation theory. The journal is published in collaboration with the Department of Mathematics and the Division of Nanotechnologies and Information Technologies of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the Institute of Mathematics of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus.