管理研究与方法论

Karl-Erik Wärneryd
{"title":"管理研究与方法论","authors":"Karl-Erik Wärneryd","doi":"10.1016/0281-7527(85)90011-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The view is taken that management researchers will need a somewhat detached attitude to the immediate problems of practitioners. Close cooperation with business practitioners is often a prerequisite for good management research, but this does not mean that the practitioner's criteria for evaluating research should supersede more independent scientific criteria. Some trends in the present methodology and research practice enhance the problem that management research may have little to contribute in terms of integrated theory. In the long run, immediate external validity of research results is an inadequate criterion of progress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101144,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(85)90011-8","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management research and methodology\",\"authors\":\"Karl-Erik Wärneryd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0281-7527(85)90011-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The view is taken that management researchers will need a somewhat detached attitude to the immediate problems of practitioners. Close cooperation with business practitioners is often a prerequisite for good management research, but this does not mean that the practitioner's criteria for evaluating research should supersede more independent scientific criteria. Some trends in the present methodology and research practice enhance the problem that management research may have little to contribute in terms of integrated theory. In the long run, immediate external validity of research results is an inadequate criterion of progress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(85)90011-8\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752785900118\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752785900118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

有人认为,管理研究人员需要对实践者的直接问题采取某种超然的态度。与商业实践者的密切合作往往是良好管理研究的先决条件,但这并不意味着实践者评价研究的标准应该取代更独立的科学标准。当前方法论和研究实践中的一些趋势加剧了管理研究在整合理论方面可能贡献甚微的问题。从长远来看,研究成果的直接外部有效性是一个不充分的进步标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management research and methodology

The view is taken that management researchers will need a somewhat detached attitude to the immediate problems of practitioners. Close cooperation with business practitioners is often a prerequisite for good management research, but this does not mean that the practitioner's criteria for evaluating research should supersede more independent scientific criteria. Some trends in the present methodology and research practice enhance the problem that management research may have little to contribute in terms of integrated theory. In the long run, immediate external validity of research results is an inadequate criterion of progress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Emerging strategies in a network context: The Volvo case Public choice, ambiguity and regulation Organizational responses to a revolutionary environment: The case of Iran Erwin Groachla 1921–1986
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1