获取学分的信息素养课程的关键方法。安吉拉·帕希亚和杰西卡·克里顿主编。芝加哥,伊利诺斯州:大学和研究图书馆协会,2019。328便士。纸本,62.00美元(ISBN 978-0-8389-8947-0)。

IF 1.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE College & Research Libraries Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.5860/crl.81.5.886
Scott Curtis
{"title":"获取学分的信息素养课程的关键方法。安吉拉·帕希亚和杰西卡·克里顿主编。芝加哥,伊利诺斯州:大学和研究图书馆协会,2019。328便士。纸本,62.00美元(ISBN 978-0-8389-8947-0)。","authors":"Scott Curtis","doi":"10.5860/crl.81.5.886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the more fraught adjectives in academic discourse is the word “critical.” The term “critical” as a precedent to any number of terms (“theory,” “pedagogy,” “literacy,” and “librarianship” are only a few) brings to the reader’s mind an array of scholarship, a large body of literature and criticism, as well as a spectrum of possible interpretations of meaning and consequence. At their core, each of these critical approaches represents a close examination and questioning of that which represents the consensus, the status quo, the establishment understanding of the subject. Our shared consensus understanding has developed through systemic choices, leading to an academic and larger socioeconomic environment that has centered the viewpoints of, and worked to the advantage of, predominantly white middle- and upper-class heterosexual men. A critical approach to information literacy pedagogy therefore seeks to decenter this predominant, consensus viewpoint from how we teach information literacy.","PeriodicalId":10686,"journal":{"name":"College & Research Libraries","volume":"22 1","pages":"886"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Approaches to Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Courses. Angela Pashia and Jessica Critten, eds. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2019. 328p. Paper, $62.00 (ISBN 978-0-8389-8947-0).\",\"authors\":\"Scott Curtis\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/crl.81.5.886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the more fraught adjectives in academic discourse is the word “critical.” The term “critical” as a precedent to any number of terms (“theory,” “pedagogy,” “literacy,” and “librarianship” are only a few) brings to the reader’s mind an array of scholarship, a large body of literature and criticism, as well as a spectrum of possible interpretations of meaning and consequence. At their core, each of these critical approaches represents a close examination and questioning of that which represents the consensus, the status quo, the establishment understanding of the subject. Our shared consensus understanding has developed through systemic choices, leading to an academic and larger socioeconomic environment that has centered the viewpoints of, and worked to the advantage of, predominantly white middle- and upper-class heterosexual men. A critical approach to information literacy pedagogy therefore seeks to decenter this predominant, consensus viewpoint from how we teach information literacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"College & Research Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.886\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"College & Research Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.886","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学术话语中,一个比较令人担忧的形容词是“批判”这个词。“批判性”一词作为许多术语(“理论”、“教育学”、“识字”和“图书馆事业”只是其中的几个)的先例,给读者带来了一系列的学术成果、大量的文学和批评,以及对意义和结果的一系列可能的解释。这些批判性方法的核心是,每一种方法都代表了对代表共识、现状和对主题的既定理解的密切审查和质疑。我们共同的共识理解是通过系统性的选择而发展起来的,导致了一个学术和更大的社会经济环境,这个环境以白人中上层异性恋男性的观点为中心,并为他们的优势服务。因此,信息素养教育学的一种关键方法寻求将这种占主导地位的共识观点从我们如何教授信息素养中分离出来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical Approaches to Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Courses. Angela Pashia and Jessica Critten, eds. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, 2019. 328p. Paper, $62.00 (ISBN 978-0-8389-8947-0).
One of the more fraught adjectives in academic discourse is the word “critical.” The term “critical” as a precedent to any number of terms (“theory,” “pedagogy,” “literacy,” and “librarianship” are only a few) brings to the reader’s mind an array of scholarship, a large body of literature and criticism, as well as a spectrum of possible interpretations of meaning and consequence. At their core, each of these critical approaches represents a close examination and questioning of that which represents the consensus, the status quo, the establishment understanding of the subject. Our shared consensus understanding has developed through systemic choices, leading to an academic and larger socioeconomic environment that has centered the viewpoints of, and worked to the advantage of, predominantly white middle- and upper-class heterosexual men. A critical approach to information literacy pedagogy therefore seeks to decenter this predominant, consensus viewpoint from how we teach information literacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
College & Research Libraries
College & Research Libraries INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
22.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊介绍: College & Research Libraries (C&RL) is the official scholarly research journal of the Association of College & Research Libraries, a division of the American Library Association, 50 East Huron St., Chicago, IL 60611. C&RL is a bimonthly, online-only publication highlighting a new C&RL study with a free, live, expert panel comprised of the study''s authors and additional subject experts.
期刊最新文献
Designing and Implementing a Community-Engaged Research e-Library: A Case Study for Adapting Academic Library Information Infrastructure to Respond to Stakeholder Needs. Welcome from the Editors “Neighborhood Library Modernization”: Public Library Development and Racial Inequality in Milwaukee during the 1960s LHRT’s Two Communities The Library: A Fragile History
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1