针刺的感觉:对针灸的特殊效果起作用的一个因素?

Thomas Lundeberg , Iréne Lund , Jan Näslund
{"title":"针刺的感觉:对针灸的特殊效果起作用的一个因素?","authors":"Thomas Lundeberg ,&nbsp;Iréne Lund ,&nbsp;Jan Näslund","doi":"10.1016/j.arthe.2012.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span><span>Acupuncture is a complex intervention, and there are both specific and non-specific influences associated with its therapeutic benefit. Although large </span>randomized controlled trials (RCT) and </span>systematic reviews<span><span> have demonstrated the efficacy of acupuncture, the conclusions are controversial due to the lack of a significant difference in the results between real and sham acupuncture. This similarity may be due to the omission of important components of the acupuncture treatment itself, such as the needling sensation. The needling sensation is considered to represent an important component of acupuncture. Despite this importance, several RCTs have lacked data on whether the needling sensation has been achieved. From a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) perspective, the needling sensation, deQi, is a combination of unique sensations that are interpreted as the flow of </span>Qi<span>, or “vital energy.” Furthermore, acupuncture is believed to be successful only upon the arrival of “vital energy,” Qi. This state is suggested to be essential to the specific therapeutic effect of acupuncture. From a biomedical perspective, acupuncture excites sensory receptors and nerve fibers in the stimulated tissue, resulting in a needling sensation. Moreover, acupuncture induces both the deactivation of a limbic–paralimbic–neocortical network in the brain (the </span></span></span>default mode network<span> and the anti-correlated task-positive network) and the activation of somatosensory regions. A distinct needling sensation is associated with a marked deactivation of these brain networks, whereas the lack of a needling sensation (as during sham needling) is associated with significantly less deactivation. Conversely, when acupuncture induces sharp pain sensations, there is an activation of these networks instead. In a clinical context, this difference means that the therapist needs to identify a stimulation intensity that is scaled to the needling response of each patient, i.e., a sharp uncomfortable pain sensation during the needle stimulation should be avoided.</span></p><p>Both the empirical bases of TCM and biomedical acupuncture research suggest that the therapist should strive for a needling sensation during an acupuncture treatment. If such a sensation is not achieved, are the specific effects of acupuncture likely smaller? This conclusion suggests that deQi is part of a proper acupuncture treatment and that the experience of a needling sensation should universally be assessed and reported in all types of clinical and experimental trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100022,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 2-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.arthe.2012.12.001","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The needling sensation: A factor contributing to the specific effects of acupuncture?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Lundeberg ,&nbsp;Iréne Lund ,&nbsp;Jan Näslund\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthe.2012.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span><span>Acupuncture is a complex intervention, and there are both specific and non-specific influences associated with its therapeutic benefit. Although large </span>randomized controlled trials (RCT) and </span>systematic reviews<span><span> have demonstrated the efficacy of acupuncture, the conclusions are controversial due to the lack of a significant difference in the results between real and sham acupuncture. This similarity may be due to the omission of important components of the acupuncture treatment itself, such as the needling sensation. The needling sensation is considered to represent an important component of acupuncture. Despite this importance, several RCTs have lacked data on whether the needling sensation has been achieved. From a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) perspective, the needling sensation, deQi, is a combination of unique sensations that are interpreted as the flow of </span>Qi<span>, or “vital energy.” Furthermore, acupuncture is believed to be successful only upon the arrival of “vital energy,” Qi. This state is suggested to be essential to the specific therapeutic effect of acupuncture. From a biomedical perspective, acupuncture excites sensory receptors and nerve fibers in the stimulated tissue, resulting in a needling sensation. Moreover, acupuncture induces both the deactivation of a limbic–paralimbic–neocortical network in the brain (the </span></span></span>default mode network<span> and the anti-correlated task-positive network) and the activation of somatosensory regions. A distinct needling sensation is associated with a marked deactivation of these brain networks, whereas the lack of a needling sensation (as during sham needling) is associated with significantly less deactivation. Conversely, when acupuncture induces sharp pain sensations, there is an activation of these networks instead. In a clinical context, this difference means that the therapist needs to identify a stimulation intensity that is scaled to the needling response of each patient, i.e., a sharp uncomfortable pain sensation during the needle stimulation should be avoided.</span></p><p>Both the empirical bases of TCM and biomedical acupuncture research suggest that the therapist should strive for a needling sensation during an acupuncture treatment. If such a sensation is not achieved, are the specific effects of acupuncture likely smaller? This conclusion suggests that deQi is part of a proper acupuncture treatment and that the experience of a needling sensation should universally be assessed and reported in all types of clinical and experimental trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acupuncture and Related Therapies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 2-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.arthe.2012.12.001\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acupuncture and Related Therapies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211766012000023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211766012000023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

针灸是一种复杂的干预措施,其治疗效果既有特异性影响,也有非特异性影响。虽然大型随机对照试验(RCT)和系统评价已经证明了针灸的疗效,但由于在真针灸和假针灸之间的结果缺乏显着差异,因此结论存在争议。这种相似性可能是由于针灸治疗本身的重要组成部分的遗漏,如针刺的感觉。针刺的感觉被认为是针灸的一个重要组成部分。尽管这一点很重要,但一些随机对照试验缺乏关于针刺感觉是否已经实现的数据。从中医的角度来看,针刺的感觉,德气,是一种独特的感觉组合,被解释为气的流动,或“生命能量”。此外,针灸被认为只有在“生命能量”气到来时才会成功。这种状态被认为对针灸的特殊治疗效果至关重要。从生物医学的角度来看,针灸刺激了受刺激组织中的感觉受体和神经纤维,从而产生针刺感。此外,针刺诱导大脑边缘-旁边缘-新皮层网络(默认模式网络和反相关任务-正网络)的失活和体感觉区域的激活。明显的针刺感与这些大脑网络的明显失活有关,而缺乏针刺感(如在假针刺期间)与明显较少的失活有关。相反,当针灸引起剧烈的痛觉时,这些神经网络反而被激活了。在临床环境中,这种差异意味着治疗师需要确定一个刺激强度,该强度与每个患者的针刺反应相匹配,即,在针刺刺激期间应避免剧烈的不舒服的疼痛感。中医和生物医学针灸研究的经验基础都表明,在针灸治疗过程中,治疗师应该努力获得针刺的感觉。如果没有达到这种感觉,针灸的具体效果是否可能更小?这一结论表明,德气是正确针灸治疗的一部分,针刺感觉的体验应该在所有类型的临床和实验试验中普遍评估和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The needling sensation: A factor contributing to the specific effects of acupuncture?

Acupuncture is a complex intervention, and there are both specific and non-specific influences associated with its therapeutic benefit. Although large randomized controlled trials (RCT) and systematic reviews have demonstrated the efficacy of acupuncture, the conclusions are controversial due to the lack of a significant difference in the results between real and sham acupuncture. This similarity may be due to the omission of important components of the acupuncture treatment itself, such as the needling sensation. The needling sensation is considered to represent an important component of acupuncture. Despite this importance, several RCTs have lacked data on whether the needling sensation has been achieved. From a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) perspective, the needling sensation, deQi, is a combination of unique sensations that are interpreted as the flow of Qi, or “vital energy.” Furthermore, acupuncture is believed to be successful only upon the arrival of “vital energy,” Qi. This state is suggested to be essential to the specific therapeutic effect of acupuncture. From a biomedical perspective, acupuncture excites sensory receptors and nerve fibers in the stimulated tissue, resulting in a needling sensation. Moreover, acupuncture induces both the deactivation of a limbic–paralimbic–neocortical network in the brain (the default mode network and the anti-correlated task-positive network) and the activation of somatosensory regions. A distinct needling sensation is associated with a marked deactivation of these brain networks, whereas the lack of a needling sensation (as during sham needling) is associated with significantly less deactivation. Conversely, when acupuncture induces sharp pain sensations, there is an activation of these networks instead. In a clinical context, this difference means that the therapist needs to identify a stimulation intensity that is scaled to the needling response of each patient, i.e., a sharp uncomfortable pain sensation during the needle stimulation should be avoided.

Both the empirical bases of TCM and biomedical acupuncture research suggest that the therapist should strive for a needling sensation during an acupuncture treatment. If such a sensation is not achieved, are the specific effects of acupuncture likely smaller? This conclusion suggests that deQi is part of a proper acupuncture treatment and that the experience of a needling sensation should universally be assessed and reported in all types of clinical and experimental trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents List Publisher's note Pneumothorax associated with acupuncture: A systematic review and analysis Mechanisms of acupuncture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1