书评:《高级宣教学:如何以可信和有用的方式研究宣教》,作者肯尼斯·内赫巴斯

K. Franklin
{"title":"书评:《高级宣教学:如何以可信和有用的方式研究宣教》,作者肯尼斯·内赫巴斯","authors":"K. Franklin","doi":"10.1177/02653788221092929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Credible people give their endorsement to this work. For example, Scott Moreau of Wheaton College Graduate School states that it is ‘a perfect book for those who want an overarching view of contemporary missiology from an evangelical vantage.’ Enoch Wan from Western Seminary notes how the gap within ‘the scarcity of textbooks in missiological research methodology’ is filled by this book. Nehrbass’s use of ‘advanced’ in the book’s title draws from a cross-section of primarily evangelical theologians and missiologists and assumes the text will guide the discipline of mission studies into a steadier and relevant future. Nehrbass’s biography mentions his experience of teaching missiology in two US evangelical institutions, and this lends credibility to his work. From the outset, the author acknowledges the crowded and complex field of missiology because of its integration with many academic fields (p. 2). Therefore, the book’s purpose is to help the reader ‘integrate multiple academic fields to increase [one’s] understanding of how Christianity spreads across cultures’ (p. 1). The author’s definition of missiology is ‘the utilization of multiple academic disciplines to develop strategies for making disciples across cultures’, and therefore the missiologist is ‘someone whose primary work is to study the way Christianity spreads across cultural boundaries’ (p. 14). In other words, missiology is viewed as the study of cross-cultural disciple-making. This perspective is apparent in mapping a missional hermeneutic of the crosscultural nature of mission with the ‘heart goal’ of ‘commit[ting] to joining in God’s desire to make Himself known throughout the world’ (p. 36). This is further developed in chapter 8, where cross-cultural discipleship is defined as ‘the process of teaching people to obey all that Jesus commanded’ and needs to include both teaching and action (p. 199). Essential to the structure of the book is the distinction drawn between theories and models; the former being ‘descriptive explanations, grounded in data, of the way the world works’ (p. 6) and the latter are ‘prescriptive ways of doing things [or] “best practices” that emerge from empirical research’ (p. 8). Mission theories and models are passed down through generations of researchers and practitioners. Some stand the test of time, and others go into dormancy. These are signs of how missiology as an academic discipline has matured through the rigorous pursuits of past and current participants in the field. Nehbrass is clear about the interdisciplinary nature of missiology by stating how it draws from other academic disciplines in its pursuit of creating new theories and models. Examples within the scholar’s work of drawing from other fields include globalisation studies, anthropology, theology and biblical studies. The author’s missiological framework departs from the conventional three-legged stool metaphor for ‘theory, history, and anthropology (more broadly, the social sciences)’ (p. 16). Instead, missiology, while being interdisciplinary, is like ‘a river with countless tributaries (theoretical disciplines) that converge at the common goal of making disciples in cross-cultural contexts. As the river moves downstream, it serves multiple Book Review","PeriodicalId":41530,"journal":{"name":"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"122 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Advanced Missiology: How to Study Missions in Credible and Useful Ways by Kenneth Nehrbass\",\"authors\":\"K. Franklin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02653788221092929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Credible people give their endorsement to this work. For example, Scott Moreau of Wheaton College Graduate School states that it is ‘a perfect book for those who want an overarching view of contemporary missiology from an evangelical vantage.’ Enoch Wan from Western Seminary notes how the gap within ‘the scarcity of textbooks in missiological research methodology’ is filled by this book. Nehrbass’s use of ‘advanced’ in the book’s title draws from a cross-section of primarily evangelical theologians and missiologists and assumes the text will guide the discipline of mission studies into a steadier and relevant future. Nehrbass’s biography mentions his experience of teaching missiology in two US evangelical institutions, and this lends credibility to his work. From the outset, the author acknowledges the crowded and complex field of missiology because of its integration with many academic fields (p. 2). Therefore, the book’s purpose is to help the reader ‘integrate multiple academic fields to increase [one’s] understanding of how Christianity spreads across cultures’ (p. 1). The author’s definition of missiology is ‘the utilization of multiple academic disciplines to develop strategies for making disciples across cultures’, and therefore the missiologist is ‘someone whose primary work is to study the way Christianity spreads across cultural boundaries’ (p. 14). In other words, missiology is viewed as the study of cross-cultural disciple-making. This perspective is apparent in mapping a missional hermeneutic of the crosscultural nature of mission with the ‘heart goal’ of ‘commit[ting] to joining in God’s desire to make Himself known throughout the world’ (p. 36). This is further developed in chapter 8, where cross-cultural discipleship is defined as ‘the process of teaching people to obey all that Jesus commanded’ and needs to include both teaching and action (p. 199). Essential to the structure of the book is the distinction drawn between theories and models; the former being ‘descriptive explanations, grounded in data, of the way the world works’ (p. 6) and the latter are ‘prescriptive ways of doing things [or] “best practices” that emerge from empirical research’ (p. 8). Mission theories and models are passed down through generations of researchers and practitioners. Some stand the test of time, and others go into dormancy. These are signs of how missiology as an academic discipline has matured through the rigorous pursuits of past and current participants in the field. Nehbrass is clear about the interdisciplinary nature of missiology by stating how it draws from other academic disciplines in its pursuit of creating new theories and models. Examples within the scholar’s work of drawing from other fields include globalisation studies, anthropology, theology and biblical studies. The author’s missiological framework departs from the conventional three-legged stool metaphor for ‘theory, history, and anthropology (more broadly, the social sciences)’ (p. 16). Instead, missiology, while being interdisciplinary, is like ‘a river with countless tributaries (theoretical disciplines) that converge at the common goal of making disciples in cross-cultural contexts. As the river moves downstream, it serves multiple Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":41530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"122 - 125\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788221092929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transformation-An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02653788221092929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可靠的人对这项工作给予认可。例如,惠顿学院研究生院(Wheaton College Graduate School)的斯科特·莫罗(Scott Moreau)说,对于那些想从福音派的角度全面了解当代宣教学的人来说,这是一本完美的书。西方神学院的以诺·万(Enoch Wan)指出,这本书填补了“宣教学研究方法论教科书匮乏”的空白。Nehrbass在书名中使用“先进”一词,主要来自福音派神学家和宣教学家的交叉部分,并假设文本将指导宣教研究的学科进入一个更稳定和相关的未来。尼赫巴斯的传记提到了他在两家美国福音派机构教授宣教学的经历,这为他的工作增加了可信度。从一开始,作者就承认宣教学是一个拥挤而复杂的领域,因为它与许多学术领域相结合(第2页)。因此,本书的目的是帮助读者“整合多个学术领域,以增加对基督教如何跨文化传播的理解”(第1页)。作者对宣教学的定义是“利用多个学科来制定跨文化门徒的策略”。因此,宣教学家是“一个主要工作是研究基督教跨越文化界限传播方式的人”(第14页)。换句话说,宣教学被视为跨文化门徒培养的研究。这一观点在描绘宣教跨文化性质的宣教解释学中是很明显的,宣教的“核心目标”是“致力于加入上帝的愿望,使他自己在全世界被认识”(第36页)。这在第8章得到了进一步的发展,跨文化门徒被定义为“教导人们服从耶稣一切命令的过程”,需要包括教导和行动(第199页)。本书的基本结构是区分理论和模型;前者是“以数据为基础的对世界运行方式的描述性解释”(第6页),后者是“从实证研究中得出的做事的规定性方法(或)“最佳实践””(第8页)。使命理论和模型是通过几代研究人员和实践者传承下来的。有些经受住了时间的考验,有些则进入了休眠状态。这些都是宣教学作为一门学科如何通过过去和现在的参与者在该领域的严格追求而成熟的迹象。内布拉斯很清楚宣教学的跨学科本质,他阐述了宣教学如何在追求创造新的理论和模式的过程中汲取其他学科的经验。在学者的工作中,从其他领域汲取的例子包括全球化研究、人类学、神学和圣经研究。作者的宣教框架与传统的“理论、历史和人类学(更广泛地说,是社会科学)”的三脚凳比喻不同(第16页)。相反,宣教学虽然是跨学科的,但它就像一条有无数支流(理论学科)的河流,汇聚在跨文化背景下培养门徒的共同目标上。当河流向下游移动时,它提供了多种书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Advanced Missiology: How to Study Missions in Credible and Useful Ways by Kenneth Nehrbass
Credible people give their endorsement to this work. For example, Scott Moreau of Wheaton College Graduate School states that it is ‘a perfect book for those who want an overarching view of contemporary missiology from an evangelical vantage.’ Enoch Wan from Western Seminary notes how the gap within ‘the scarcity of textbooks in missiological research methodology’ is filled by this book. Nehrbass’s use of ‘advanced’ in the book’s title draws from a cross-section of primarily evangelical theologians and missiologists and assumes the text will guide the discipline of mission studies into a steadier and relevant future. Nehrbass’s biography mentions his experience of teaching missiology in two US evangelical institutions, and this lends credibility to his work. From the outset, the author acknowledges the crowded and complex field of missiology because of its integration with many academic fields (p. 2). Therefore, the book’s purpose is to help the reader ‘integrate multiple academic fields to increase [one’s] understanding of how Christianity spreads across cultures’ (p. 1). The author’s definition of missiology is ‘the utilization of multiple academic disciplines to develop strategies for making disciples across cultures’, and therefore the missiologist is ‘someone whose primary work is to study the way Christianity spreads across cultural boundaries’ (p. 14). In other words, missiology is viewed as the study of cross-cultural disciple-making. This perspective is apparent in mapping a missional hermeneutic of the crosscultural nature of mission with the ‘heart goal’ of ‘commit[ting] to joining in God’s desire to make Himself known throughout the world’ (p. 36). This is further developed in chapter 8, where cross-cultural discipleship is defined as ‘the process of teaching people to obey all that Jesus commanded’ and needs to include both teaching and action (p. 199). Essential to the structure of the book is the distinction drawn between theories and models; the former being ‘descriptive explanations, grounded in data, of the way the world works’ (p. 6) and the latter are ‘prescriptive ways of doing things [or] “best practices” that emerge from empirical research’ (p. 8). Mission theories and models are passed down through generations of researchers and practitioners. Some stand the test of time, and others go into dormancy. These are signs of how missiology as an academic discipline has matured through the rigorous pursuits of past and current participants in the field. Nehbrass is clear about the interdisciplinary nature of missiology by stating how it draws from other academic disciplines in its pursuit of creating new theories and models. Examples within the scholar’s work of drawing from other fields include globalisation studies, anthropology, theology and biblical studies. The author’s missiological framework departs from the conventional three-legged stool metaphor for ‘theory, history, and anthropology (more broadly, the social sciences)’ (p. 16). Instead, missiology, while being interdisciplinary, is like ‘a river with countless tributaries (theoretical disciplines) that converge at the common goal of making disciples in cross-cultural contexts. As the river moves downstream, it serves multiple Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Tambaram, 1938: Christianity's shift to the Global South Religious pluralism, public religion, and principled pluralism in Indonesia TRN regnum book notice Book Review: Christ-Followers in Other Religions: The Global Witness of Insider Movements by Darren Todd Duerksen Charism and Liturgy: Elements of the Orthodox Theological Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1