用澳大利亚标准预测预应力混凝土梁的抗剪和抗扭强度的验证

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Australian Journal of Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884
H. Pham
{"title":"用澳大利亚标准预测预应力混凝土梁的抗剪和抗扭强度的验证","authors":"H. Pham","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of shear and torsional strength of prestressed concrete girders predicted using Australian Standards\",\"authors\":\"H. Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着AS5100-2017的发布,钢筋和预应力混凝土梁的抗剪和抗扭强度的设计方法最近发生了变化。目前要求根据修正压缩场理论计算抗剪强度。这是为了使澳大利亚的做法与国际惯例保持一致。然而,关于这种转换,特别是预应力混凝土梁,已经发现了许多问题。对于许多工程师来说,AS5100-2017中的新方法和配方是否能够更好地预测抗剪强度,这一点尚不清楚。在本文中,作者着手解决这个问题,首先解释了公式的基础和所作的简化。为了验证该模型,我们收集了一个精心挑选的已发表实验数据数据库,并使用测试数据来验证代码制定的准确性。本文的研究重点是预应力梁的抗剪强度,同时也对钢筋梁的抗剪和抗扭强度进行了探讨。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Verification of shear and torsional strength of prestressed concrete girders predicted using Australian Standards
ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
期刊最新文献
Performance evaluation of concrete comprising sugarcane bagasse ash and recycled polyethylene terephthalate Improving seismic performance of structural systems via reinforcing column bases Evaluation on structural performance of hybrid composite post-tension plate girder through finite element analysis Determination of response modification coefficient of SPSW in RC frame using plastic design method A plastic hinge method for static pushover analysis of 3D frame structures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1