{"title":"用澳大利亚标准预测预应力混凝土梁的抗剪和抗扭强度的验证","authors":"H. Pham","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of shear and torsional strength of prestressed concrete girders predicted using Australian Standards\",\"authors\":\"H. Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.2019884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Verification of shear and torsional strength of prestressed concrete girders predicted using Australian Standards
ABSTRACT The design methodology for shear and torsional strength of reinforced and prestressed concrete beams have been changed recently following the release of AS5100-2017. The shear strength is now required to be computed based on the Modified Compression Field Theory. This is to align Australian practice with international practice. However, there have been many issues identified regarding this switch, especially for prestressed concrete girders. It is not clear to many engineers if the new methodology and formulations in AS5100-2017 do provide a better prediction of the shear strength. In this paper, the author set out to address this question by first explaining the basis of the formulation and the simplifications that have been made. To verify the model, a carefully selected database of published experimental data was collected and the test data was used to validate the accuracy of the code formulation. While the focus of this study is for shear strength of prestressed girders, shear and torsional strength for reinforced girders was also explored.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.