了解妇女参与地方政治:正式/非正式的二分法有多有用?

Sue Brownill, Susan Halford
{"title":"了解妇女参与地方政治:正式/非正式的二分法有多有用?","authors":"Sue Brownill,&nbsp;Susan Halford","doi":"10.1016/0260-9827(90)90036-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Feminist critiques of the public-private (male-female) dichotomy and feminist redefinitions of what is considered ‘political’ both have major implications for considering women's political activity. Arising from this a new dichotomy has emerged which distinguishes ‘formal’ politics from ‘informal’ politics. Taking examples which supposedly lie on either side of this division—local government women's committees and women's community action in London's docklands—our paper explores the usefulness of the formal-informal dichotomy. We outline the <em>similarities</em> which exist between women's political activity in both spheres, the empirical and theoretical <em>interconnections</em> between the spheres, and suggest that the division is invalid at all but a most superficial level. This paper argues that it is vital to move beyond looking at categories to look at the political processes which underlie them.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101034,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography Quarterly","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 396-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90036-A","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding women's involvement in local politics: How useful is a formal/informal dichotomy?\",\"authors\":\"Sue Brownill,&nbsp;Susan Halford\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0260-9827(90)90036-A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Feminist critiques of the public-private (male-female) dichotomy and feminist redefinitions of what is considered ‘political’ both have major implications for considering women's political activity. Arising from this a new dichotomy has emerged which distinguishes ‘formal’ politics from ‘informal’ politics. Taking examples which supposedly lie on either side of this division—local government women's committees and women's community action in London's docklands—our paper explores the usefulness of the formal-informal dichotomy. We outline the <em>similarities</em> which exist between women's political activity in both spheres, the empirical and theoretical <em>interconnections</em> between the spheres, and suggest that the division is invalid at all but a most superficial level. This paper argues that it is vital to move beyond looking at categories to look at the political processes which underlie them.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Geography Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 396-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0260-9827(90)90036-A\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Geography Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026098279090036A\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026098279090036A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

女权主义者对公私(男性-女性)二分法的批评和女权主义者对什么是“政治”的重新定义,都对考虑女性的政治活动产生了重大影响。由此产生了一种新的二分法,将“正式”政治与“非正式”政治区分开来。我们的论文以这一划分的任何一方为例——当地政府的妇女委员会和伦敦港区的妇女社区行动——探讨了正式-非正式二分法的有用性。我们概述了妇女在这两个领域的政治活动之间存在的相似之处,以及这两个领域之间的经验和理论联系,并建议这种划分在最肤浅的层面上是无效的。本文认为,重要的是要超越对类别的关注,关注它们背后的政治过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding women's involvement in local politics: How useful is a formal/informal dichotomy?

Feminist critiques of the public-private (male-female) dichotomy and feminist redefinitions of what is considered ‘political’ both have major implications for considering women's political activity. Arising from this a new dichotomy has emerged which distinguishes ‘formal’ politics from ‘informal’ politics. Taking examples which supposedly lie on either side of this division—local government women's committees and women's community action in London's docklands—our paper explores the usefulness of the formal-informal dichotomy. We outline the similarities which exist between women's political activity in both spheres, the empirical and theoretical interconnections between the spheres, and suggest that the division is invalid at all but a most superficial level. This paper argues that it is vital to move beyond looking at categories to look at the political processes which underlie them.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interstate conflict over exchanges of homeland territory, 1816–1980 The global environmental movement: Reclaiming paradise The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth The new geopolitics of minerals: Canada and international resource trade Caring for workers' dependents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1