前列腺癌局灶治疗中的分子生物标志物:来自局灶治疗学会德尔菲共识的建议。

G. Marra, M. P. Laguna, J. Walz, C. Pavlovich, F. Bianco, J. Gregg, A. Lebastchi, H. Lepor, P. Macek, S. Rais-Bahrami, C. Robertson, D. Rukstalis, G. Salomon, O. Ukimura, A. Abreu, Y. Barbe, X. Cathelineau, G. Gandaglia, A. George, J. Rivas, Rajan T Gupta, N. Lawrentschuk, V. Kasivisvanathan, D. Lomas, B. Malavaud, D. Margolis, Y. Matsuoka, S. Mehralivand, M. Moschini, M. Oderda, H. Orabi, A. Rastinehad, M. Remzi, A. Schulman, T. Shin, T. Shiraishi, A. Sidana, S. Shoji, A. Stabile, M. Valerio, V. Tammisetti, Wei Phin Tan*, W. van den Bos, A. Villers, Peter Willemse, J. J. de la Rosette, T. Polascik, R. Sanchez-Salas
{"title":"前列腺癌局灶治疗中的分子生物标志物:来自局灶治疗学会德尔菲共识的建议。","authors":"G. Marra, M. P. Laguna, J. Walz, C. Pavlovich, F. Bianco, J. Gregg, A. Lebastchi, H. Lepor, P. Macek, S. Rais-Bahrami, C. Robertson, D. Rukstalis, G. Salomon, O. Ukimura, A. Abreu, Y. Barbe, X. Cathelineau, G. Gandaglia, A. George, J. Rivas, Rajan T Gupta, N. Lawrentschuk, V. Kasivisvanathan, D. Lomas, B. Malavaud, D. Margolis, Y. Matsuoka, S. Mehralivand, M. Moschini, M. Oderda, H. Orabi, A. Rastinehad, M. Remzi, A. Schulman, T. Shin, T. Shiraishi, A. Sidana, S. Shoji, A. Stabile, M. Valerio, V. Tammisetti, Wei Phin Tan*, W. van den Bos, A. Villers, Peter Willemse, J. J. de la Rosette, T. Polascik, R. Sanchez-Salas","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04160-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nFocal Therapy (FT) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localised PCa.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nA 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, i) the current/present role; ii) the potential/future role; iii) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (n=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (n=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (n=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (n=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localised PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society.\",\"authors\":\"G. Marra, M. P. Laguna, J. Walz, C. Pavlovich, F. Bianco, J. Gregg, A. Lebastchi, H. Lepor, P. Macek, S. Rais-Bahrami, C. Robertson, D. Rukstalis, G. Salomon, O. Ukimura, A. Abreu, Y. Barbe, X. Cathelineau, G. Gandaglia, A. George, J. Rivas, Rajan T Gupta, N. Lawrentschuk, V. Kasivisvanathan, D. Lomas, B. Malavaud, D. Margolis, Y. Matsuoka, S. Mehralivand, M. Moschini, M. Oderda, H. Orabi, A. Rastinehad, M. Remzi, A. Schulman, T. Shin, T. Shiraishi, A. Sidana, S. Shoji, A. Stabile, M. Valerio, V. Tammisetti, Wei Phin Tan*, W. van den Bos, A. Villers, Peter Willemse, J. J. de la Rosette, T. Polascik, R. Sanchez-Salas\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04160-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nFocal Therapy (FT) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localised PCa.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\nA 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, i) the current/present role; ii) the potential/future role; iii) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (n=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (n=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (n=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (n=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localised PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04160-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04160-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

前列腺癌(PCa)的局灶治疗(FT)是有前景的。然而,长期的肿瘤学结果有待观察,对后续策略也没有共识。分子生物标志物(MB)可能有助于选择、治疗和随访接受FT的男性,尽管在这一领域指导实践的证据有限。我们的目标是召开一个共识会议,由焦点治疗学会(Focal Therapy Society)批准,在一大群专家中,了解MB在FT中治疗局部PCa的潜在效用。材料与方法查阅文献,编制38项问卷。然后,作者使用DelphiManager进行了三轮德尔福共识,使用GRADE网格评分系统,随后进行了面对面的专家会议。确定并涵盖了与金融时报MB相关的三个兴趣领域:i)当前/现在的角色;Ii)潜在/未来的角色;Iii)未来研究的建议特征。共识是用70%的同意阈值来定义的。结果95名受邀专家中,有42人(44.2%)完成了3轮德尔菲。达成一致意见的项目有24个,并由(n=15)名专家参加会议批准。就不确定性达成协商一致意见或未达成协商一致意见的项目有14个。他们被重新讨论,得出共识(n=3),对部分协议的共识(n=1),以及对不确定性的共识(n=10)。从批准和讨论的项目中导出了最终的语句列表,并添加了三个生成的语句,以便为本地化PCa提供有关金融时报背景下MB的指导。这一领域的研究工作应被视为优先事项。结论:本研究详细说明了在FT中使用MB治疗PCa的初步共识。直到有关该主题的证据出现为止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Molecular biomarkers in the context of focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations of a Delphi Consensus from the Focal Therapy Society.
BACKGROUND Focal Therapy (FT) for Prostate Cancer (PCa) is promising. However, long-term oncological results are awaited and there is no consensus on follow-up strategies. Molecular biomarkers (MB) may be useful in selecting, treating and following up men undergoing FT, though there is limited evidence in this field to guide practice. We aimed to conduct a consensus meeting, endorsed by the Focal Therapy Society, amongst a large group of experts, to understand the potential utility of MB in FT for localised PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS A 38-item questionnaire was built following a literature search. The authors then performed three rounds of a Delphi Consensus using DelphiManager, using the GRADE grid scoring system, followed by a face-to-face expert meeting. Three areas of interest were identified and covered concerning MB for FT, i) the current/present role; ii) the potential/future role; iii) the recommended features for future studies. Consensus was defined using a 70% agreement threshold. RESULTS Of 95 invited experts, 42 (44.2%) completed the three Delphi rounds. Twenty-four items reached a consensus and they were then approved at the meeting involving (n=15) experts. Fourteen items reached a consensus on uncertainty, or they did not reach a consensus. They were re-discussed, resulting in a consensus (n=3), a consensus on a partial agreement (n=1), and a consensus on uncertainty (n=10). A final list of statements were derived from the approved and discussed items, with the addition of three generated statements, to provide guidance regarding MB in the context of FT for localised PCa. Research efforts in this field should be considered a priority. CONCLUSIONS The present study detailed an initial consensus on the use of MB in FT for PCa. This is until evidence becomes available on the subject.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Real-life data on long-term follow-up of patients successfully treated with percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). Identifying tumor-related risk factors for simultaneous adrenalectomy in patients with cT1 - cT2 kidney cancer during robotic assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. A systematic review of nerve-sparing surgery for high-risk prostate cancer. Comparison of outcomes between laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors (RENAL score ≥ 7 or maximum tumor size > 4cm): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Totally intracorporeal robotic ileal ureter replacement: focus on surgical technique and outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1