新瓶装陈酒?新《证券法》中的私人证券诉讼

4区 计算机科学 Q1 Computer Science Advances in Computers Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.14296/AC.V2I2.5252
Ding Chen
{"title":"新瓶装陈酒?新《证券法》中的私人证券诉讼","authors":"Ding Chen","doi":"10.14296/AC.V2I2.5252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Private securities litigation has been very weak since the establishment of China’s stock market some 30 years ago. A new law on securities took effect in March 2020 and introduces some reformist changes to this area. This article will examine the likely effect of the new Securities Law on this form of litigation. In particular, it will examine China’s most celebrated ‘quasi-class action’ system, i.e. Special Representative Litigation. This procedure is borrowed from Taiwan’s non-profit organization model. The essay argues that, since the new Securities Law has made only limited efforts in addressing the primary reason for the weak private securities litigation, namely, lack of judicial independence, it is unlikely to make any significant changes to private securities litigation in China.","PeriodicalId":50867,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Computers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Old Wines in New Bottles? Private Securities Litigation in China’s New Securities Law\",\"authors\":\"Ding Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.14296/AC.V2I2.5252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Private securities litigation has been very weak since the establishment of China’s stock market some 30 years ago. A new law on securities took effect in March 2020 and introduces some reformist changes to this area. This article will examine the likely effect of the new Securities Law on this form of litigation. In particular, it will examine China’s most celebrated ‘quasi-class action’ system, i.e. Special Representative Litigation. This procedure is borrowed from Taiwan’s non-profit organization model. The essay argues that, since the new Securities Law has made only limited efforts in addressing the primary reason for the weak private securities litigation, namely, lack of judicial independence, it is unlikely to make any significant changes to private securities litigation in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Computers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14296/AC.V2I2.5252\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Computers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14296/AC.V2I2.5252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自30多年前中国股市建立以来,私人证券诉讼一直非常薄弱。新的证券法于2020年3月生效,并对该领域进行了一些改革。本文将探讨新《证券法》对这种诉讼形式可能产生的影响。特别地,它将研究中国最著名的“准集体诉讼”制度,即特别代表诉讼。这一程序借鉴了台湾的非营利组织模式。本文认为,由于新《证券法》在解决私人证券诉讼薄弱的主要原因即司法独立性不足方面所做的努力有限,因此不太可能对中国的私人证券诉讼产生重大变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Old Wines in New Bottles? Private Securities Litigation in China’s New Securities Law
Private securities litigation has been very weak since the establishment of China’s stock market some 30 years ago. A new law on securities took effect in March 2020 and introduces some reformist changes to this area. This article will examine the likely effect of the new Securities Law on this form of litigation. In particular, it will examine China’s most celebrated ‘quasi-class action’ system, i.e. Special Representative Litigation. This procedure is borrowed from Taiwan’s non-profit organization model. The essay argues that, since the new Securities Law has made only limited efforts in addressing the primary reason for the weak private securities litigation, namely, lack of judicial independence, it is unlikely to make any significant changes to private securities litigation in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Computers
Advances in Computers 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its first volume in 1960, Advances in Computers has presented detailed coverage of innovations in computer hardware, software, theory, design, and applications. It has also provided contributors with a medium in which they can explore their subjects in greater depth and breadth than journal articles usually allow. As a result, many articles have become standard references that continue to be of significant, lasting value in this rapidly expanding field.
期刊最新文献
Power-Efficient Network-on-Chips: Design and Evaluation Edge/Fog Computing Paradigm: The Concept Platforms and Applications Data Prefetching Techniques in Computer Systems El efecto escudo fiscal como determinante de la estructura de capital y la generación de valor: un análisis empírico para el mercado colombiano Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Minat Investasi Pemodal Kecil Di Pasar Modal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1