解释不平等与增长的证据:非正式性与再分配

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS B E Journal of Macroeconomics Pub Date : 2007-01-24 DOI:10.2202/1935-1690.1498
S. DavisLewis
{"title":"解释不平等与增长的证据:非正式性与再分配","authors":"S. DavisLewis","doi":"10.2202/1935-1690.1498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper constructs a simple model that can account for both the negative relationship between growth and income inequality observed in the cross-country data and the positive relationship observed within countries over time. The model employs a dual-economy structure with formal and informal sectors. Growth is driven by formal sector human capital spillovers. Restrictive institutions impose barriers to formality that reduce the growth rate and increase inequality. Redistributive taxation lowers inequality but blunts the incentive to accumulate, lowering growth. Institutional structures vary more across than within countries. Consequently, variations in institutional barriers to formality may account for the negative relationship between growth and inequality found in the cross-country data. Variations in the intensity of redistribution may account for the positive relationship observed within countries over time.","PeriodicalId":45923,"journal":{"name":"B E Journal of Macroeconomics","volume":"97 1","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explaining the Evidence on Inequality and Growth: Informality and Redistribution\",\"authors\":\"S. DavisLewis\",\"doi\":\"10.2202/1935-1690.1498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper constructs a simple model that can account for both the negative relationship between growth and income inequality observed in the cross-country data and the positive relationship observed within countries over time. The model employs a dual-economy structure with formal and informal sectors. Growth is driven by formal sector human capital spillovers. Restrictive institutions impose barriers to formality that reduce the growth rate and increase inequality. Redistributive taxation lowers inequality but blunts the incentive to accumulate, lowering growth. Institutional structures vary more across than within countries. Consequently, variations in institutional barriers to formality may account for the negative relationship between growth and inequality found in the cross-country data. Variations in the intensity of redistribution may account for the positive relationship observed within countries over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"B E Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"volume\":\"97 1\",\"pages\":\"1-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"B E Journal of Macroeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1498\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B E Journal of Macroeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1690.1498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

摘要

本文构建了一个简单的模型,既可以解释在跨国数据中观察到的增长与收入不平等之间的负相关关系,也可以解释随着时间的推移在国家内部观察到的正相关关系。该模型采用正式部门和非正式部门的双重经济结构。增长受到正规部门人力资本溢出效应的推动。限制性制度对繁文缛节设置了障碍,从而降低了增长率,加剧了不平等。再分配税收降低了不平等,但削弱了积累的动力,从而降低了增长。国家间的制度结构差异大于国家内部。因此,制度障碍的变化可能解释了跨国数据中发现的增长与不平等之间的负相关关系。随着时间的推移,再分配强度的变化可能是各国内部观察到的积极关系的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Explaining the Evidence on Inequality and Growth: Informality and Redistribution
This paper constructs a simple model that can account for both the negative relationship between growth and income inequality observed in the cross-country data and the positive relationship observed within countries over time. The model employs a dual-economy structure with formal and informal sectors. Growth is driven by formal sector human capital spillovers. Restrictive institutions impose barriers to formality that reduce the growth rate and increase inequality. Redistributive taxation lowers inequality but blunts the incentive to accumulate, lowering growth. Institutional structures vary more across than within countries. Consequently, variations in institutional barriers to formality may account for the negative relationship between growth and inequality found in the cross-country data. Variations in the intensity of redistribution may account for the positive relationship observed within countries over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics publishes significant research and scholarship in both theoretical and applied macroeconomics. The journal\"s mandate is to assemble papers from the broad research spectrum covered by modern macroeconomics. The range of topics includes business cycle research, economic growth, and monetary economics, as well as topics drawn from the substantial areas of overlap between macroeconomics and international economics, labor economics, finance, development economics, political economy, public economics, and econometric theory.
期刊最新文献
A Tide that Lifts Some Boats: Assessing the Macroeconomic Effects of EU Enlargement Optimal Monetary Policy with Government-Provided Unemployment Benefits Current Account Balances’ Divergence in the Euro Area: An Appraisal of the Underlying Forces Intermediate Goods–Skill Complementarity Initial Beliefs Uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1