脑出血的治疗与管理进展

Brett E. Skolnick PhD , A. David Mendelow FRCS, PhD
{"title":"脑出血的治疗与管理进展","authors":"Brett E. Skolnick PhD ,&nbsp;A. David Mendelow FRCS, PhD","doi":"10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Currently there are no “gold standards of care” in place for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Clinical trial data have indicated that the largest expansion of the hemorrhage volume occurs within the early hours after the onset of symptoms. This expansion of hematoma volume has been shown to be a critical factor in predicting mortality 30 days postictus. Thus, it is reasonable that minimizing hematoma growth, and any associated perihematomal edema, could potentially provide clinical benefit, reduce the degree of neurological damage, improve functional outcomes, and reduce mortality. Traditionally, surgical interventions were the only option for improving patient outcome or preventing mortality. There has been a great deal of debate surrounding the clinical benefit of surgery. The results of the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage conclusively demonstrated that there was no clear advantage gained by the early surgical evacuation of hematomas, as compared with conservative treatment. The results of a recently concluded clinical trial of ICH patients demonstrated that the early administration of the </span>hemostatic agent, recombinant activated </span>coagulation factor VIIa, within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms, reduced hematoma expansion as compared with placebo. In addition, the treatment of ICH patients with recombinant activated coagulation factor VIIa also demonstrated significant improvements in several neurological, functional, and disability scales. This review will summarize the current understanding, provide an overview of new treatment trends, and suggest potential strategies for future investigations into ICH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101154,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in the Treatment and Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Brett E. Skolnick PhD ,&nbsp;A. David Mendelow FRCS, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>Currently there are no “gold standards of care” in place for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Clinical trial data have indicated that the largest expansion of the hemorrhage volume occurs within the early hours after the onset of symptoms. This expansion of hematoma volume has been shown to be a critical factor in predicting mortality 30 days postictus. Thus, it is reasonable that minimizing hematoma growth, and any associated perihematomal edema, could potentially provide clinical benefit, reduce the degree of neurological damage, improve functional outcomes, and reduce mortality. Traditionally, surgical interventions were the only option for improving patient outcome or preventing mortality. There has been a great deal of debate surrounding the clinical benefit of surgery. The results of the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage conclusively demonstrated that there was no clear advantage gained by the early surgical evacuation of hematomas, as compared with conservative treatment. The results of a recently concluded clinical trial of ICH patients demonstrated that the early administration of the </span>hemostatic agent, recombinant activated </span>coagulation factor VIIa, within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms, reduced hematoma expansion as compared with placebo. In addition, the treatment of ICH patients with recombinant activated coagulation factor VIIa also demonstrated significant improvements in several neurological, functional, and disability scales. This review will summarize the current understanding, provide an overview of new treatment trends, and suggest potential strategies for future investigations into ICH.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1053/j.scds.2006.01.010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1528993106000112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Cerebrovascular Diseases and Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1528993106000112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,对于脑出血(ICH)的治疗还没有“黄金护理标准”。临床试验数据表明,出血量最大的扩张发生在症状出现后的最初几个小时内。血肿体积的扩大已被证明是预测产后30天死亡率的一个关键因素。因此,最小化血肿生长和任何相关的血肿周围水肿可能提供潜在的临床益处,减少神经损伤程度,改善功能结局,降低死亡率是合理的。传统上,手术干预是改善患者预后或预防死亡率的唯一选择。关于手术的临床益处有很多争论。国际脑出血外科试验的结果确凿地表明,与保守治疗相比,早期手术清除血肿没有明显的优势。最近结束的一项脑出血患者临床试验结果表明,与安慰剂相比,在症状出现后4小时内早期给予止血剂重组活化凝血因子VIIa,可减少血肿扩张。此外,重组活化凝血因子VIIa治疗脑出血患者在若干神经、功能和残疾量表上也显示出显著改善。这篇综述将总结目前的认识,概述新的治疗趋势,并提出未来研究ICH的潜在策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Advances in the Treatment and Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Currently there are no “gold standards of care” in place for the treatment of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Clinical trial data have indicated that the largest expansion of the hemorrhage volume occurs within the early hours after the onset of symptoms. This expansion of hematoma volume has been shown to be a critical factor in predicting mortality 30 days postictus. Thus, it is reasonable that minimizing hematoma growth, and any associated perihematomal edema, could potentially provide clinical benefit, reduce the degree of neurological damage, improve functional outcomes, and reduce mortality. Traditionally, surgical interventions were the only option for improving patient outcome or preventing mortality. There has been a great deal of debate surrounding the clinical benefit of surgery. The results of the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Hemorrhage conclusively demonstrated that there was no clear advantage gained by the early surgical evacuation of hematomas, as compared with conservative treatment. The results of a recently concluded clinical trial of ICH patients demonstrated that the early administration of the hemostatic agent, recombinant activated coagulation factor VIIa, within 4 hours of the onset of symptoms, reduced hematoma expansion as compared with placebo. In addition, the treatment of ICH patients with recombinant activated coagulation factor VIIa also demonstrated significant improvements in several neurological, functional, and disability scales. This review will summarize the current understanding, provide an overview of new treatment trends, and suggest potential strategies for future investigations into ICH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Introduction Table of contents Advances in the Treatment and Management of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Intraventricular Hemorrhage: Presentation and Management Options
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1