难治性室性心动过速的星状传导阻滞:风暴后的平静。

B. Narasimhan, H. Tandri
{"title":"难治性室性心动过速的星状传导阻滞:风暴后的平静。","authors":"B. Narasimhan, H. Tandri","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing use of implantable defibrillators for sudden death prevention and the recent advances in heart failure therapies have significantly altered the natural history of heart disease. An unfortunate consequence of this is the increasing incidence of refractory tachyarrhythmias. The most serious of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is the electrical storm, defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia over a 24-hour period.1 The annual incidence varies from 2% to 10% and is associated with a 2to 8-fold increase in mortality. This is most likely a testament to the severely compromised underlying myocardial substrate than to the electrical storm itself. It is well established that the sympathetic nervous system plays an integral role in initiating and driving electrical storm.2 Pharmacological approaches to sympathetic blockade using β-blockers though effective have several shortcomings. The sympathetic nervous system involves multiple nonadrenergic pathways and neuromodulators which are unaffected by these medications. Additionally, the β2 receptor which is untouched by the conventionally cardio-selective β-blockers appears to play an integral proarrhythmic role as well. These shortcomings are overcome by surgical approaches where the cardiac sympathetic supply in its entirety is decentralized. The earliest attempt at surgical sympathectomy was over a century ago when Jonnesco3 performed a left cardiac sympathetic denervation in a successful attempt to relieve refractory angina in syphilitic aortitis.2 Since that time the field has burgeoned with a number of interventions targeting multiple sites along the sympathetic chain. These range from thoracic epidural/general anesthesia, stellate ganglion blockade, renal artery denervation to surgical stellate ganglion resection. Cardiac sympathetic denervation is undeniably beneficial in certain conditions—however, consensus about where it fits into regular practice remains to be established. Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (PC-SGB) is currently the least invasive method available, and its role in management of electrical storm is comprehensively explored in this issue of Heart Rhythm by Tian et al.4 In the largest prospective study of PC-SGB to date, 30 patients presenting with drug-refractory electric storm between 2013 and 2018 were included (58±14 years, 73.3% males, mean left ventricular election fraction, 34±15). Ultrasound guidance was used in the majority of patients with half the study population undergoing a left-sided stellate block, with bilateral blockade in the remainder. An incremental approach was used with an initial left-sided SGB, and progression to bilateral block if recurrence of arrhythmia was noted within 10 minutes. Rise in ipsilateral arm temperature was used as a surrogate for efficacy of block, though the authors themselves indicate that the temperatures were inadequately measured. EDITORIAL","PeriodicalId":10167,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stellate Block in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: The Calm After the Storm.\",\"authors\":\"B. Narasimhan, H. Tandri\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The increasing use of implantable defibrillators for sudden death prevention and the recent advances in heart failure therapies have significantly altered the natural history of heart disease. An unfortunate consequence of this is the increasing incidence of refractory tachyarrhythmias. The most serious of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is the electrical storm, defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia over a 24-hour period.1 The annual incidence varies from 2% to 10% and is associated with a 2to 8-fold increase in mortality. This is most likely a testament to the severely compromised underlying myocardial substrate than to the electrical storm itself. It is well established that the sympathetic nervous system plays an integral role in initiating and driving electrical storm.2 Pharmacological approaches to sympathetic blockade using β-blockers though effective have several shortcomings. The sympathetic nervous system involves multiple nonadrenergic pathways and neuromodulators which are unaffected by these medications. Additionally, the β2 receptor which is untouched by the conventionally cardio-selective β-blockers appears to play an integral proarrhythmic role as well. These shortcomings are overcome by surgical approaches where the cardiac sympathetic supply in its entirety is decentralized. The earliest attempt at surgical sympathectomy was over a century ago when Jonnesco3 performed a left cardiac sympathetic denervation in a successful attempt to relieve refractory angina in syphilitic aortitis.2 Since that time the field has burgeoned with a number of interventions targeting multiple sites along the sympathetic chain. These range from thoracic epidural/general anesthesia, stellate ganglion blockade, renal artery denervation to surgical stellate ganglion resection. Cardiac sympathetic denervation is undeniably beneficial in certain conditions—however, consensus about where it fits into regular practice remains to be established. Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (PC-SGB) is currently the least invasive method available, and its role in management of electrical storm is comprehensively explored in this issue of Heart Rhythm by Tian et al.4 In the largest prospective study of PC-SGB to date, 30 patients presenting with drug-refractory electric storm between 2013 and 2018 were included (58±14 years, 73.3% males, mean left ventricular election fraction, 34±15). Ultrasound guidance was used in the majority of patients with half the study population undergoing a left-sided stellate block, with bilateral blockade in the remainder. An incremental approach was used with an initial left-sided SGB, and progression to bilateral block if recurrence of arrhythmia was noted within 10 minutes. Rise in ipsilateral arm temperature was used as a surrogate for efficacy of block, though the authors themselves indicate that the temperatures were inadequately measured. EDITORIAL\",\"PeriodicalId\":10167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007707\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007707","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

植入式除颤器越来越多地用于预防猝死,以及心力衰竭治疗的最新进展,已显著改变了心脏病的自然史。不幸的是,这增加了难治性心动过速的发生率。最严重的室性心律失常(VA)是电风暴,定义为24小时内持续室性心动过速≥3次年发病率从2%到10%不等,与死亡率增加2至8倍有关。这很可能是心肌基底严重受损的证明,而不是电风暴本身。交感神经系统在电风暴的产生和驱动中起着不可或缺的作用利用β受体阻滞剂进行交感神经阻滞的药理学方法虽然有效,但也存在一些不足。交感神经系统包括多种非肾上腺素能通路和神经调节剂,它们不受这些药物的影响。此外,β2受体不受传统的心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂的影响,似乎也起着不可或缺的促心律失常作用。这些缺点可以通过分散心脏交感神经供应的手术方法来克服。最早尝试外科交感神经切除术是在一个多世纪以前,当时Jonnesco3成功地实施了左心交感神经去断术,以缓解梅毒性主动脉难治性心绞痛从那时起,这个领域迅速发展起来,针对交感神经链上的多个部位进行了一系列干预。这些方法包括胸椎硬膜外/全身麻醉、星状神经节阻滞、肾动脉去神经支配和手术切除星状神经节。不可否认,心脏交感神经去支配在某些情况下是有益的——然而,关于它在什么情况下适合常规实践的共识仍有待建立。经皮星状神经节阻断术(PC-SGB)是目前可用的侵入性最小的方法,Tian等人在这一期《心律》杂志上全面探讨了其在电风暴治疗中的作用。在迄今为止最大的PC-SGB前瞻性研究中,纳入了30例2013年至2018年间出现药物难治性电风暴的患者(58±14岁,男性73.3%,平均左室选择分数34±15)。超声引导用于大多数患者,其中一半的研究人群接受左侧星状阻滞,其余患者接受双侧阻滞。初始左侧SGB采用渐进式方法,如果在10分钟内发现心律失常复发,则进展为双侧阻滞。同侧手臂温度的升高被用作阻滞疗效的替代指标,尽管作者自己指出温度测量不充分。编辑
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Stellate Block in Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia: The Calm After the Storm.
The increasing use of implantable defibrillators for sudden death prevention and the recent advances in heart failure therapies have significantly altered the natural history of heart disease. An unfortunate consequence of this is the increasing incidence of refractory tachyarrhythmias. The most serious of ventricular arrhythmias (VA) is the electrical storm, defined as ≥3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia over a 24-hour period.1 The annual incidence varies from 2% to 10% and is associated with a 2to 8-fold increase in mortality. This is most likely a testament to the severely compromised underlying myocardial substrate than to the electrical storm itself. It is well established that the sympathetic nervous system plays an integral role in initiating and driving electrical storm.2 Pharmacological approaches to sympathetic blockade using β-blockers though effective have several shortcomings. The sympathetic nervous system involves multiple nonadrenergic pathways and neuromodulators which are unaffected by these medications. Additionally, the β2 receptor which is untouched by the conventionally cardio-selective β-blockers appears to play an integral proarrhythmic role as well. These shortcomings are overcome by surgical approaches where the cardiac sympathetic supply in its entirety is decentralized. The earliest attempt at surgical sympathectomy was over a century ago when Jonnesco3 performed a left cardiac sympathetic denervation in a successful attempt to relieve refractory angina in syphilitic aortitis.2 Since that time the field has burgeoned with a number of interventions targeting multiple sites along the sympathetic chain. These range from thoracic epidural/general anesthesia, stellate ganglion blockade, renal artery denervation to surgical stellate ganglion resection. Cardiac sympathetic denervation is undeniably beneficial in certain conditions—however, consensus about where it fits into regular practice remains to be established. Percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade (PC-SGB) is currently the least invasive method available, and its role in management of electrical storm is comprehensively explored in this issue of Heart Rhythm by Tian et al.4 In the largest prospective study of PC-SGB to date, 30 patients presenting with drug-refractory electric storm between 2013 and 2018 were included (58±14 years, 73.3% males, mean left ventricular election fraction, 34±15). Ultrasound guidance was used in the majority of patients with half the study population undergoing a left-sided stellate block, with bilateral blockade in the remainder. An incremental approach was used with an initial left-sided SGB, and progression to bilateral block if recurrence of arrhythmia was noted within 10 minutes. Rise in ipsilateral arm temperature was used as a surrogate for efficacy of block, though the authors themselves indicate that the temperatures were inadequately measured. EDITORIAL
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Coronary Sinus Metabolite 12,13-diHOME Is a Novel Biomarker for Left Atrial Remodeling in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Impact of Contact Force on Pulsed Field Ablation Outcomes Using Focal Point Catheter Characteristics of Right-Sided Accessory Pathways Associated With Right Cardiac Veins Prognostic Impact of Sinus Rhythm in Atrial Fibrillation Patients: Separating Rhythm Outcomes From Randomized Strategy Findings From the CABANA Trial Trends Favoring an Anatomical Approach to Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias Originating From the Left Ventricular Summit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1