一个世纪以来传教士民族学家人类学著述的话语分析

T. Cooper
{"title":"一个世纪以来传教士民族学家人类学著述的话语分析","authors":"T. Cooper","doi":"10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists\nand existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness,\nthe potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist\nunderpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these\ntexts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited\nvolumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries,\nincluding anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as\nintermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse\nThree). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive\nof them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five),\nor identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I\nsuggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological\ndiscipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily\nuncanny, repressed, productive other.","PeriodicalId":42823,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Discursive Analysis of a Century of Anthropological Writings on Missionary Ethnographers\",\"authors\":\"T. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists\\nand existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness,\\nthe potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist\\nunderpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these\\ntexts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited\\nvolumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries,\\nincluding anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as\\nintermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse\\nThree). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive\\nof them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five),\\nor identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I\\nsuggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological\\ndiscipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily\\nuncanny, repressed, productive other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion and Society-Advances in Research\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion and Society-Advances in Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考察了人类学家撰写的、存在于学科意识中的关于传教士的论述。另类、距离和同一性的问题,民族志潜在的剥削效应,以及传教士和人类学过去令人不安的殖民主义基础,在这些文本中脱颖而出。利用大量的期刊文章、民族志专著和编辑卷,我确定、描述和分析了关于传教士的六种主要话语,包括人类学对传教士作为陪衬(话语一)、作为中介(话语二)以及作为善与恶表现(话语三)的描述。其他线索将传教士视为数据(话语四),将他们视为方法论的祖先和民族志的同事(话语五),或者将他们反射性地识别为人类学家和基督徒(话语六)。我认为传教士是一个典型的陪衬,而人类学的学科正是与之相对立的。对人类学家来说,传教的人种学家必然是一个神秘的、压抑的、多产的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Discursive Analysis of a Century of Anthropological Writings on Missionary Ethnographers
This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists and existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness, the potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist underpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these texts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited volumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries, including anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as intermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse Three). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive of them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five), or identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I suggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological discipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily uncanny, repressed, productive other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
What You Wear, What You Eat, and Whom You Love Who Counts as ‘None’? Religiously Nonreligious The ‘Ideal’ Atheist Resistance Through Nonperformance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1