{"title":"一个世纪以来传教士民族学家人类学著述的话语分析","authors":"T. Cooper","doi":"10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists\nand existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness,\nthe potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist\nunderpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these\ntexts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited\nvolumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries,\nincluding anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as\nintermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse\nThree). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive\nof them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five),\nor identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I\nsuggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological\ndiscipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily\nuncanny, repressed, productive other.","PeriodicalId":42823,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Discursive Analysis of a Century of Anthropological Writings on Missionary Ethnographers\",\"authors\":\"T. Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists\\nand existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness,\\nthe potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist\\nunderpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these\\ntexts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited\\nvolumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries,\\nincluding anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as\\nintermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse\\nThree). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive\\nof them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five),\\nor identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I\\nsuggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological\\ndiscipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily\\nuncanny, repressed, productive other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42823,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion and Society-Advances in Research\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion and Society-Advances in Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Society-Advances in Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/ARRS.2018.090106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Discursive Analysis of a Century of Anthropological Writings on Missionary Ethnographers
This article examines discussions of missionaries penned by anthropologists
and existing in disciplinary consciousness. Questions of alterity, distance and sameness,
the potentially exploitative effects of ethnography, and the uncomfortable colonialist
underpinnings of both missionary and anthropological pasts come to the fore in these
texts. Drawing on a wealth of journal articles, ethnographic monographs, and edited
volumes, I identify, describe, and analyze six predominant discourses on missionaries,
including anthropological depictions of missionaries as foils (Discourse One), as
intermediaries (Discourse Two), and as present in good or bad manifestations (Discourse
Three). Other threads constitute missionaries as data (Discourse Four), conceive
of them as methodological ancestors and ethnographic colleagues (Discourse Five),
or identify them reflexively as both anthropologists and Christians (Discourse Six). I
suggest that missionaries serve as an archetypical foil against which the anthropological
discipline emerges. Missionary ethnographers are for anthropologists a necessarily
uncanny, repressed, productive other.