术中滑动风险影响因素的模拟研究

John M. Nakayama , Gregory J. Gerling , Kyle E. Horst , Victoria W. Fitz , Leigh A. Cantrell , Susan C. Modesitt
{"title":"术中滑动风险影响因素的模拟研究","authors":"John M. Nakayama ,&nbsp;Gregory J. Gerling ,&nbsp;Kyle E. Horst ,&nbsp;Victoria W. Fitz ,&nbsp;Leigh A. Cantrell ,&nbsp;Susan C. Modesitt","doi":"10.1016/j.cogc.2014.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To identify the impact of weight, table surface, and table type on slipping in a simulation of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mannequin was placed into increasing Trendelenburg until a slip was observed; the table angle at the time of the event was measured (slip angle). The influence of mannequin position (supine vs. lithotomy), weight, table surface, and model was evaluated. A linear regression model was used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mannequin weight, bed surface, and bed type all significantly impacted the slip angles. In general, higher mannequin weights tolerated significantly more Trendelenburg before slipping in the supine position but less in lithotomy compared to lower weights. In lithotomy, the disposable sheet and gelpad performed worse than the bean bag, egg crate foam, and bedsheet. There was no difference in slipping because of bed surface in the supine model. The Skytron operating table performed significantly better than the Steris operating table when tested with the bedsheet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Operative position, patient weight, and bed surface together influence the slipping propensity. In lithotomy, heavier patients were more prone to slipping while the inverse was true in supine. The egg crate foam, bean bag, and bedsheet were the best antislip surfaces. Operating room table choice can mitigate slippage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 24-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2014.12.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping\",\"authors\":\"John M. Nakayama ,&nbsp;Gregory J. Gerling ,&nbsp;Kyle E. Horst ,&nbsp;Victoria W. Fitz ,&nbsp;Leigh A. Cantrell ,&nbsp;Susan C. Modesitt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cogc.2014.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>To identify the impact of weight, table surface, and table type on slipping in a simulation of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A mannequin was placed into increasing Trendelenburg until a slip was observed; the table angle at the time of the event was measured (slip angle). The influence of mannequin position (supine vs. lithotomy), weight, table surface, and model was evaluated. A linear regression model was used to analyze the data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Mannequin weight, bed surface, and bed type all significantly impacted the slip angles. In general, higher mannequin weights tolerated significantly more Trendelenburg before slipping in the supine position but less in lithotomy compared to lower weights. In lithotomy, the disposable sheet and gelpad performed worse than the bean bag, egg crate foam, and bedsheet. There was no difference in slipping because of bed surface in the supine model. The Skytron operating table performed significantly better than the Steris operating table when tested with the bedsheet.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Operative position, patient weight, and bed surface together influence the slipping propensity. In lithotomy, heavier patients were more prone to slipping while the inverse was true in supine. The egg crate foam, bean bag, and bedsheet were the best antislip surfaces. Operating room table choice can mitigate slippage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 24-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cogc.2014.12.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955314000647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Ovarian and Other Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212955314000647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

研究背景:在模拟微创妇科手术中,确定重量、台面和台面类型对滑动的影响。方法将人体模型置于增加的Trendelenburg中,直至观察到滑移;测量了事件发生时的工作台角度(滑移角)。评估假人体位(仰卧或取石)、体重、台面和模型的影响。采用线性回归模型对数据进行分析。结果人体模型的重量、床面、床型对滑移角均有显著影响。一般来说,与体重较轻的人体模型相比,体重较重的人体模型在仰卧位滑倒前耐受的Trendelenburg明显较多,但在取石时耐受的Trendelenburg较少。在取石术中,一次性床单和胶垫的效果不如豆袋、蛋箱泡沫和床单。在仰卧模型中,由于床面不同导致的滑动没有差异。在使用床单进行测试时,Skytron手术台的性能明显优于Steris手术台。结论手术体位、体重、床面等因素共同影响滑倒倾向。在取石术中,体重较大的患者更容易滑倒,而仰卧位患者则相反。蛋箱泡沫、豆袋和床单是最好的防滑表面。手术台的选择可以减轻滑动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping

Background

To identify the impact of weight, table surface, and table type on slipping in a simulation of minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Methods

A mannequin was placed into increasing Trendelenburg until a slip was observed; the table angle at the time of the event was measured (slip angle). The influence of mannequin position (supine vs. lithotomy), weight, table surface, and model was evaluated. A linear regression model was used to analyze the data.

Results

Mannequin weight, bed surface, and bed type all significantly impacted the slip angles. In general, higher mannequin weights tolerated significantly more Trendelenburg before slipping in the supine position but less in lithotomy compared to lower weights. In lithotomy, the disposable sheet and gelpad performed worse than the bean bag, egg crate foam, and bedsheet. There was no difference in slipping because of bed surface in the supine model. The Skytron operating table performed significantly better than the Steris operating table when tested with the bedsheet.

Conclusion

Operative position, patient weight, and bed surface together influence the slipping propensity. In lithotomy, heavier patients were more prone to slipping while the inverse was true in supine. The egg crate foam, bean bag, and bedsheet were the best antislip surfaces. Operating room table choice can mitigate slippage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WITHDRAWN: Epigenetic Pathways Offer Targets for Ovarian Cancer Treatment Table of Contents Editorial Board A Simulation Study of the Factors Influencing the Risk of Intraoperative Slipping Genetic Cancer Ovary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1